Files

pqhuy1987 ea440da990

Deploy SOLUTION_ERP / build-deploy (push) Successful in 3m46s

Details

[CLAUDE] Domain+App+Api+Infra+FE-Admin+FE-User: S34 Plan 2 G-O1 Danh bạ nội bộ

Phase 10.2 Văn phòng số — Internal Directory (1 endpoint reuse Users +
EmployeeProfiles + Departments, FE card grid avatar/dept/email/phone/Ext).

BE Task 1+2 (em main solo):
- Application/Office/DirectoryFeatures.cs — GetDirectoryQuery + DirectoryItemDto
  12 field LEFT JOIN Users.IsActive + Departments + EmployeeProfiles
- Api/Controllers/DirectoryController.cs — GET /api/directory?search=&departmentId=
  class-level [Authorize] (mọi authenticated NV tra cứu danh bạ nội bộ)
- MenuKeys.cs +Off+OffDanhBa const + All[] update
- DbInitializer.SeedMenuTreeAsync Off Order=29 + OffDanhBa Order=1 dưới Off

FE Task 3 (Implementer Case 2 Pattern 16-bis 4-place mirror cross-app — 5×):
- types/directory.ts SHA256 7349d9f64e78 × 2 app IDENTICAL
- pages/office/InternalDirectoryPage.tsx SHA256 2aa7e0eed2c8 × 2 app IDENTICAL
  Card grid responsive 1/2/3/4 col + filter dept dropdown + search input
  Avatar 14×14 initials gradient PALETTE 6 màu (Pattern 14 Tailwind JIT)
  EmployeeCode badge + Department emerald badge + email mailto + phone tel
  Internal phone Ext: amber badge + empty/loading state Vietnamese 100%
- App.tsx route /directory × 2 app
- lib/menuKeys.ts Off+OffDanhBa const × 2 app
- components/Layout.tsx resolvePath staticMap Off_DanhBa:/directory × 2 app
  (gotcha #50 — 5 places mirror crossapp DON'T MISS)

Verify:
- dotnet build PASS (2 warn DocxRenderer existing, 0 error)
- dotnet test 120/120 PASS (58 Domain + 62 Infra baseline preserve)
- npm build × 2 app PASS 0 TS err (fe-admin 1436KB / fe-user 1350KB)

Implementer MEMORY Pattern 16-bis reinforced 5× cumulative (S29 Plan CA HF1 +
S29 Plan B Chunk D + S33 Plan B G-H1 Task 5 + S34 Plan G-O1 Task 3).

Endpoint smoke pending CICD post-deploy Stage 4 (Run #XXX expected ~3m30s).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-05-27 13:39:10 +07:00

26 KiB

Raw Blame History

Implementer Agent — Persistent Memory

Persistent diary cross-session. Auto-injected first 200 lines / 25KB at spawn. Update BEFORE every stop. Curate when > 25KB.

🎯 Role baseline

Code execution specialist for SOLUTION_ERP. Conditional WRITE (Case 1+2+3+5 ONLY). Tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Skill, Grep, Glob. Output: commits + verification report.

🚨 STRICT scope auto-refuse criteria

REFUSE if ANY:

Schema design decisions needed (FK strategy / nullable / discriminator)
UX flow decisions needed (drawer vs tab vs modal)
Cross-stack > 2 layers tight coupling
Bug fix involving reasoning chain
Integration testing involving multiple components
< 30 min trivial task
First time pattern (no prior precedent)
Spec ambiguity > 20%

📋 Patterns proven (cross-session) — apply confidently

Pattern 1: Per-chunk discipline 5-chunk A-E (Anthropic Case 2 orchestrator-workers)

Memory feedback_per_chunk_commit chốt:

Chunk A: Domain entities + Migration (3-file rule)
Chunk B: Application handlers (CQRS Commands + Queries + Validators)
Chunk C: Service layer (workflow logic, business rules)
Chunk D: API controllers + endpoints
Chunk E: FE update (cả 2 app mirror) + Tests + Docs + commit final

Build + test pass mỗi chunk. Commit message format:

[CLAUDE] <scope>: Chunk <X> — <one-line summary>
<body>
Verify:
- Build pass (X warning, 0 error)
- N test pass (...)
Pending Chunk <Y+1>: <next>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

Pattern 2: 3-file rule EF migration (BẮT BUỘC commit đủ)

Memory + gotcha #17:

Migrations/{TS}_{Name}.cs (Up + Down)
Migrations/{TS}_{Name}.Designer.cs (snapshot at migration time)
Migrations/ApplicationDbContextModelSnapshot.cs (current snapshot)

dotnet ef migrations add <Name> \
  --project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure \
  --startup-project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Api

# Apply lên DB Dev:
dotnet ef database update --project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure \
  --startup-project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Api \
  --connection "Server=(localdb)\MSSQLLocalDB;Database=SolutionErp_Dev;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"

# Apply lên DB Design (catchup nếu thiếu):
dotnet ef database update --project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure \
  --startup-project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Api

Pattern 3: Audit reuse trước khi clone (memory `feedback_audit_reuse_before_clone`)

Khi user nói "clone X sang Y":

Grep discriminator field (ApplicableType, Type, Kind enum)
Check Service / Handler / Controller có hardcode type cụ thể không
Check FE pages có route dynamic typeCode hay hardcode
Check menu key (BE const + FE menuKeys.ts) — thường thiếu chính ở đây
Default reuse 80%, chỉ thêm menu key + sample seed (3 file ~60 LOC)

Bài học S17+ Clone B: 1 commit 937eb24, deploy 1 phát chạy.

Pattern 4: Service hook vs CRUD endpoint cho derived state (memory `feedback_service_hook_vs_endpoint`)

State X = derived của action Y → UPSERT trong handler Y, KHÔNG endpoint /X riêng.

Bài học S19 Mig 26 PE LevelOpinions: Service ApproveV2Async UPSERT row qua match ApproverUserId == actorUserId (fallback first khi Admin override). 0 endpoint mới.

Pattern 5: FE mirror 2 app rule §3.9

Duplicate fe-admin/ + fe-user/ CÓ CHỦ ĐÍCH:

Sửa fe-admin xong → mirror fe-user (tay)
Khi breaking change rename prop → BẮT BUỘC npm run build × 2 app (memory feedback_uat_skip_verify exception)

Pattern 6: VND format helpers + Phone/Email validate (S20 turn 4)

Inline mỗi file FE PE:

const parseVnd = (s: string): number => Number(s.replace(/[^\d]/g, '')) || 0
const formatVndInput = (n: number): string => (n > 0 ? n.toLocaleString('vi-VN') : '')
const PHONE_RE = /^0\d{9,10}$/
const EMAIL_RE = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/
const isValidPhone = (s: string) => !s || PHONE_RE.test(s.replace(/[\s\-.]/g, ''))
const isValidEmail = (s: string) => !s || EMAIL_RE.test(s)

Pattern 7: Per-NV admin opt-in flag (S21 t5 Mig 29 + S22 Mig 30)

ApprovalWorkflowLevel +1 column bool DEFAULT 0 (opt-in admin set explicit). EF config HasDefaultValue(false). DTO extend field. FE Designer checkbox inline mỗi Level row.

Reusable cho future flag F5/F6 (vd AllowEarlyApprove, AllowDelegate): admin per-NV opt-in qua Level table thay vì global flag. Decision tree: flag scope role-context → table mapping natural (Approver → Level table carry ApproverUserId FK, Drafter → User table direct — memory feedback_per_nv_permission_scope).

Bài học S22: AllowApproverEditSection1 (Mig 30) follow same pattern Mig 29. 0 schema redesign cần.

Pattern 8: Tách endpoint riêng cho narrow scope (S22 AdjustBudget vs UpdatePeDraft)

Khi 1 action có 2 scope khác nhau theo role:

Drafter scope (rộng): UpdatePeDraft cover Section 1 (Tên/Địa điểm/Mô tả/Payment + Budget) — chỉ phase Nháp / Trả lại
Approver scope (hẹp): AdjustBudget chỉ Budget rows — phase Đang duyệt với per-NV flag

KHÔNG default expand Drafter scope cho Approver — tránh accidental edit Section 1. Endpoint tách riêng = guard tự nhiên + audit trail rõ.

Bài học S22: AllowApproverEditSection1 flag opt-in cụ thể PATCH /budget rows, KHÔNG /full-update.

Pattern 9: Defense-in-depth FE + BE guard pair (S22+1)

UI button disabled={!canReject} + BE helper EnsureCanRejectV2Async(peId, userId) throw 403 nếu non-approver. Tránh request forge non-approver gọi PATCH direct qua DevTools.

Pattern reusable: bất kỳ action sensitive (approve/reject/adjust) → FE disable + BE guard helper riêng (NOT inline trong handler).

Bài học S22+1: 3 button (Duyệt / Trả lại / Từ chối) — UI disable + BE helper. Tránh leak action qua API direct.

Pattern 10: Reflection-based regression test cho Authorize policy (S22 Plan C task 4 #44)

5 test lightweight ~50 LOC catch class-level [Authorize(Policy = "...")] regression:

var attr = typeof(ControllerXxx).GetCustomAttribute<AuthorizeAttribute>();
attr.Policy.Should().Be("CanDoSomething");

KHÔNG cần WebApplicationFactory heavy (slow + complex setup). Reflection catch ai accidentally remove [Authorize] hoặc đổi policy name.

Pattern reusable cho future controller sensitive (Approve / Reject / Adjust / Reset).

Trong PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowServiceReturnModeTests + PurchaseEvaluationDraftGuardTests:

private async Task<Guid> SeedWorkflowAsync(...) {
    // 1 Step (DepartmentId=null skip Dept FK) + 2 Levels
}

private async Task SeedApproversAsync(Guid levelId, ...) {
    // Multi user via fix.CreateUserAsync
}

Pattern reusable: test PE workflow → 1 Step + 2 Levels + N approvers per Level. DepartmentId=null skip Dept FK ràng buộc. Token cost ~80 LOC repeated cross 2 test class S22.

Pattern 12: InternalsVisibleTo csproj expose helper cho test (S22)

PurchaseEvaluationDraftGuard static helper internal — expose qua <InternalsVisibleTo Include="SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests" /> trong SolutionErp.Application.csproj thay vì rewrite public API.

Tránh API surface bloat. Reusable cho future guard / helper internal cần test.

Khi spec yêu cầu "move page X từ fe-admin → fe-user" hoặc ngược lại (Implementer Case 2 cookie-cutter mirror page), MUST mirror 4 places (NOT just 3):

✅ Page file (pages/<dir>/*.tsx) — copy nguyên content, verify import path @/... resolves
✅ App.tsx Routes — add <Route path="..." element={...} />
✅ lib/menuKeys.ts constants — mirror BE MenuKeys.cs thêm key mới
⚠️ components/Layout.tsx resolvePath staticMap — KEY mapping → route path. DỄ MISS vì khác file scope với pages directory.

Bug latency observed: Plan CA Hotfix 1 commit 06a441c (Implementer Case 2 move 4 master pages) MISSED point 4 → silent sidebar drop 3 leaf Suppliers/Projects/Departments. Bro UAT catch screenshot post-deploy. Em main solo fix Hotfix 1 commit e55d96b +12 LOC. Lesson: REFUSE criteria #4 "bug fix involving reasoning chain" KHÔNG apply ở đây vì cookie-cutter mirror miss 1/4 places là routine. Phòng tránh: task prompt MUST list 4 places explicit.

Verification post-fix: Reviewer Cat 1 "Wire claim verify" SHOULD add to checklist: "Sidebar menu visible end-to-end test post-build" — curl /api/menus/me + grep MenuLeaf render output. Smart Friend prevent silent drop.

S34 G-O1 Task 3 reinforcement (2026-05-27, Plan B Internal Directory): Pattern 16-bis applied clean lần thứ 5 cumulative. Mirror 4 places × 2 app (8 modification + 4 new file) cho Off_DanhBa → /directory:

4 new file: types/directory.ts × 2 (SHA256 7349d9f64e78) + pages/office/InternalDirectoryPage.tsx × 2 (SHA256 2aa7e0eed2c8) — both MATCH identical hash
6 modified: App.tsx × 2 (+route), menuKeys.ts × 2 (+Off/OffDanhBa const), Layout.tsx × 2 (+staticMap Off_DanhBa)
npm build × 2 app: fe-admin 21.99s clean (bundle 1436.71 kB / gzip 364.54 kB), fe-user 9.37s clean (bundle 1350.28 kB / gzip 349.01 kB) — 0 TS error
Token cost ~20k (under budget 25k). Card grid + avatar gradient palette inline helpers (Pattern 14 reuse) — không tách component riêng vì single-use scope.
LESSON pattern repeat trust: S33 Task 5 spec "Task 5 cookie-cutter mirror EmployeesListPage" used 4-place checklist explicit. S34 G-O1 Task 3 spec follow same template → execute 0 ambiguity. Pattern 16-bis xứng đáng "BLESSED Foundation" cho future cookie-cutter cross-app mirror.

Khi spec yêu cầu "mirror entity X từ PE module sang Contract module" (vd LevelOpinions / DepartmentApproval / ManualBudgetFields):

Sub-task 6 file MAX — không hơn vì entity cookie-cutter rất narrow:
1. New entity class Domain/<Module>/<Entity>.cs (rename FK field + nav)
2. Modify parent entity: add List<X> Children nav collection
3. Modify IApplicationDbContext: add DbSet<X> Xs { get; }
4. Modify ApplicationDbContext: add public DbSet<X> Xs => Set<X>();
5. New <Entity>Configuration.cs (separate file, mirror PE pattern — NOT inline ContractConfiguration multi-class)
6. dotnet ef migrations add <Name> → 3 file scaffold (mig + Designer + Snapshot updated)
AuditableEntity inherit match PE pattern (13 column scaffold = 4 BaseEntity + 6 Audit + 4 own field)
FK pattern mirror PE EXACT:
- Parent FK Cascade (xoá HĐ/PE → wipe children)
- 3rd-party FK Restrict (admin xoá Level/Dept chặn nếu còn child reference)
- User FK skip nav (denorm <Type>ByFullName để tránh cascade xoá user)
Mig scaffold verify: column structure + 2 FK + 2 index (UNIQUE composite + supporting non-unique) khớp 100% PE counterpart
Apply 2 DB: Dev (SolutionErp_Dev explicit connection) + Design (default factory) per feedback_designtime_runtime_db
Test baseline preserve: 111 PASS no regression (Mig table-add KHÔNG đụng existing entity)

Token cost ~15k tokens (Mig add + Mig file Read verify + Apply 2 DB + Build + Test). Bài học S29 Plan B Chunk C commit 26c98d3: 8 file +4265 LOC (Mig Designer.cs ~4033 LOC autogen chiếm 95%), implementer code ~232 LOC handcraft only. Em main spec deterministic 100% — 0 spec ambiguity → ACCEPT clean.

Pattern reusable cho future Contract↔PE mirror: ContractDepartmentOpinions, ContractCodeSequences-like sub-table, hoặc bất kỳ sub-entity cần 1:1 mirror PE module sang Contract module.

Pattern 13: Read-only admin Designer mirror page (S24 Plan AA Chunk B)

Khi spec yêu cầu "user xem read-only data admin đã config" (vd workflow matrix ghim, permission summary, dept tree readonly):

Drop edit mutations — useMutation / PATCH / POST / DELETE KHÔNG cần
Reuse DTO types subset — copy AwAdminOverviewDto từ admin sang user types/ (KHÔNG re-export, KHÔNG share package — duplicate có chủ đích §3.9)
Filter via query param BE-side — ?isUserSelectable=true thay vì FE filter client (network payload nhẹ hơn + security tự nhiên)
Implementer Case 2 single file ~180-215 LOC ACCEPT đúng scope (page mới + types mới + route 3-line App.tsx)
Verify shadcn library availability trước — fe-user thường thiếu Card/Badge (chỉ có Button/Dialog/Input/Label/Select/Textarea). Fallback inline <div className="rounded-lg border bg-card p-4"> mirror admin Designer DefinitionCard

Bài học S24 Plan AA Chunk B: 3 file ~305 LOC, useQuery readonly, no mutation, ACCEPTED ~14k tokens. Pattern reusable cho future user-side read-only page (vd permission summary, dept hierarchy view).

Pattern 14: Tailwind JIT palette array (S24 Plan AA)

Tailwind v3 JIT KHÔNG resolve dynamic class interpolation (bg-${color}-50 → purge xoá khi production build). Solution: PALETTE array với full class strings literal.

const PALETTE = [
  { bg: 'bg-blue-50/40', border: 'border-blue-200', text: 'text-blue-900', accent: 'bg-blue-100' },
  { bg: 'bg-emerald-50/40', border: 'border-emerald-200', text: 'text-emerald-900', accent: 'bg-emerald-100' },
  { bg: 'bg-amber-50/40', border: 'border-amber-200', text: 'text-amber-900', accent: 'bg-amber-100' },
  // ... 6-8 colors total
] as const

// Apply cycle qua index:
const colorClasses = PALETTE[index % PALETTE.length]
<div className={`${colorClasses.bg} ${colorClasses.border}`}>...</div>

Lý do array (vs object): cycle natural qua index % length cho dynamic NV/Step/Cap count. Lý do as const: TypeScript narrow literal type tránh string.

Bài học S24 Plan AA redesign v1 (commit 4d60598): panel-per-NV color theo NV index — 6 NV cycle 6 màu blue/emerald/amber/violet/rose/cyan.

Pattern 15: HTML table rowSpan iteration helper (S24 Plan AA redesign v2)

Khi render table với nested rowSpan (vd Bước rowSpan N cấp × Cấp rowSpan M NV), nested loop + conditional cells gây nhầm key + hard maintain. Solution: flat row builder helper với metadata flags.

type FlatRow = {
  stepIndex: number
  capIndex: number
  nvIndex: number
  isFirstInStep: boolean   // render Bước cell
  rowSpanStep: number      // cap count × nv count
  isFirstInCap: boolean    // render Cấp cell
  rowSpanCap: number       // nv count
  // ... level data
}

function buildFlatRows(definition: AwDefinitionDto): FlatRow[] {
  const rows: FlatRow[] = []
  definition.steps.forEach((step, si) => {
    const stepNvCount = step.levels.reduce((sum, lv) => sum + lv.users.length, 0)
    step.levels.forEach((cap, ci) => {
      cap.users.forEach((nv, ni) => {
        rows.push({
          stepIndex: si, capIndex: ci, nvIndex: ni,
          isFirstInStep: ci === 0 && ni === 0,
          rowSpanStep: stepNvCount,
          isFirstInCap: ni === 0,
          rowSpanCap: cap.users.length,
          // ...
        })
      })
    })
  })
  return rows
}

// Render flat:
{rows.map(row => (
  <tr key={`${row.stepIndex}-${row.capIndex}-${row.nvIndex}`}>
    {row.isFirstInStep && <td rowSpan={row.rowSpanStep}>{step.name}</td>}
    {row.isFirstInCap && <td rowSpan={row.rowSpanCap}>{cap.name}</td>}
    <td>{nv.fullName}</td>
    {/* 7 flag cells */}
  </tr>
))}

Cleaner than nested forEach + render-time if (ni === 0) <td rowSpan={...}>. Easier debug (console.log rows array thấy structure rõ).

Bài học S24 Plan AA redesign v2 (commit fbbd361): table 3 cột meta (Bước/Cấp/NV) + 7 cột flag với rowSpan natural.

⚠️ Anti-patterns observed (DO NOT)

❌ Skip MEMORY.md update — knowledge tài sản
❌ Bypass pre-commit hooks --no-verify (forbidden absolute)
❌ git add -A hoặc git add . — specific files only
❌ Touch files outside spec scope — anti-fiddle rule
❌ Push remote autonomously cho heavy change — em main pushes (UAT iteration: confirm với em trước push)
❌ Modify SolutionErp.slnx autonomously — em main updates khi thêm .cs/.csproj
❌ Lower bar to match em main quality — Smart Friend Cognition anti-pattern
❌ Proceed when spec ambiguous > 20% — return REFUSE với reason

🧠 SOLUTION_ERP conventions (auto-load via skills)

BE .NET 10: PascalCase tiếng Anh entities + DTO records + command names. CQRS + MediatR + FluentValidation + AutoMapper. Repository qua IApplicationDbContext. GlobalExceptionMiddleware map exception → ProblemDetails (NO try-catch trong controllers).
FE React 19 + Vite 8 + TS 6: Named export only (trừ App). TanStack Query. shadcn/ui copy-paste. TS6 erasableSyntaxOnly cấm enum → const-object pattern. UI 100% tiếng Việt. Mirror 2 app rule §3.9.
Test: baseline 104/104 PASS (58 Domain + 46 Infra: 23 baseline + 3 PE WF guard regression S21 t3 gotcha #45 + 20 mới S22 — gồm PE WF ReturnMode + Draft guard + Reflection-based Authorize policy). Phase 9 UAT skip per chunk theo memory feedback_uat_skip_verify. Stack xUnit + FluentAssertions 7.2 + EF SQLite 10 TestApplicationDbContext override nvarchar(max) → TEXT.
Build: dotnet build SolutionErp.slnx clean 0 err + npm run build × 2 app pass.
Commit: [CLAUDE] <scope>: <message> + Co-Authored-By Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context).

Scopes (pick 1)

Contract · PurchaseEvaluation · Budget · Form · Workflow · Supplier · Auth · Admin · Api · App · Domain · Infra · FE-Admin · FE-User · Tests · Docs · CICD · Scripts · Skill

🔑 Pin versions (package pinning §2.8)

KHÔNG * / latest. Critical pins:

MediatR 12.4.1 (14 fail DI)
Swashbuckle 6.9.0 (10 conflict OpenApi 2)
Node engines >= 20 + CI pin 20.x (bài học NamGroup, memory feedback_node_cicd)
LibreOffice 25.8.6
@microsoft/signalr 8.0.7

📅 Recent activity (last 10 FIFO)

2026-05-26 (S33 Plan B G-H1 Task 5 — Phase 10.1 FE 2 app HRM scaffold Case 2 cookie-cutter cross-app mirror): Em main spec deterministic 100% ULTRA-MINIMAL scope (Phase 1 read-only, no separate DetailTabs component, inline 6-section <details> collapsible, no satellite CRUD). Implementer Case 2 cross-app mirror 4-place ACCEPT clean. Tổng 14 file (3 NEW page × 2 app SHA256 IDENTICAL + 4 modified file: menuKeys+Layout+App × 2). 3 NEW file SHA256 verified IDENTICAL: types/employee.ts CCFC70666568 + pages/hrm/EmployeesListPage.tsx DC859C897C5C + pages/hrm/EmployeeCreatePage.tsx C796F25D01AC. Pattern 16-bis 4-place mirror cross-app reinforced 4th time cumulative (S29 Plan CA HF1 + S29 Plan B Chunk D + S33 Task 5). Pattern 12-bis cross-module FE port PE → Hrm reinforced 4th time (Plan B Chunk C Mig 33 + Plan B G-H1 Task 4 BE + Task 5 FE). Verify all clean: fe-admin build PASS (21.4s 0 TS err 1429KB bundle warn expected), fe-user build PASS (9.2s 0 TS err 1345KB bundle warn expected), dotnet build PASS (1.59s 0 warn 0 err), dotnet test PASS 120/120 baseline preserve (58 Domain + 62 Infra). Ambiguities encountered: 0 — spec deterministic 100%. Files touched: fe-admin/src/types/employee.ts (NEW, ~283 LOC), fe-admin/src/pages/hrm/EmployeesListPage.tsx (NEW, ~417 LOC), fe-admin/src/pages/hrm/EmployeeCreatePage.tsx (NEW, ~178 LOC), fe-admin/src/lib/menuKeys.ts (+3 LOC Hrm+HrmHoSo), fe-admin/src/components/Layout.tsx (+4 LOC staticMap Hrm_HoSo), fe-admin/src/App.tsx (+5 LOC imports+routes), 6 fe-user files mirror identical (3 SHA256 + 3 edit mirror Hrm_HoSo). Out-of-scope respected: KHÔNG satellite CRUD form, KHÔNG inline edit Header, KHÔNG PermissionGuard wire (em main Task 6 Hrm_HoSo policy registration). KHÔNG add Bg_/Catalog to fe-admin menuKeys.ts (em main defer optional). Token cost estimate: ~25k tokens (Read 8 reference + Write 3 file + Edit 6 + 3 Bash verify). KHÔNG commit (em main commits). Tag: [mirror-page, phase-10.1, frontend].
2026-05-26 (S32 wrap — em main proxy curate + Plan G 11 module future scope): Session 32 đóng clean. Em chủ trì spawn em 1 lần S32 startup verify (ab23cc322b5d495c0 alive, MEMORY size FLAG 36.2KB > 25KB). Em main proxy curate Plan A3: archived 5 verbose entries q2 (S25 Plan AB Chunk A + S25 wrap + S26 t1 Plan AG + S27 Plan CA Chunk B + S29 Plan B Chunk D detail) → 36.2→27.5KB. Patterns 1-19 + 12-bis + 16-bis foundation preserved untouched. Plan G 11 module backlog DOCUMENTED migration-todos với 10 Plan G-* atomic sprint. Pending tasks em main S33 spawn em Case 2 cookie-cutter mirror: (a) Plan G-H1 Hồ sơ NS scaffold — BE 6 entity (EmployeeProfile main + 5 satellite WorkHistory/Education/FamilyRelation/Skill/Document) + EF Config + DbInitializer seed 30 demo profile mirror 30 users + CQRS Create/Update/GetDetail/List + 6 endpoint controller + FE 2 app types/employee.ts + EmployeesPage 3-panel + EmployeeDetailTabs (6 section); (b) Plan B-Wrap test bundle BW1-BW7 codegen — Case 2 cookie-cutter mirror PE WorkflowService test pattern (PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowServiceReturnModeTests.cs structure) cho ContractWorkflowServiceApproveV2Tests.cs (7 test scenario spec deterministic migration-todos D-Bis); (c) Plan G-O2 Phòng họp BookingCalendar — Case 2 FE 2 app FullCalendar lib new dep; (d) Plan G-O3..G-O6 Workflow Apps — cookie-cutter mirror PE Mig 22-26 Plan B pattern 12-bis cross-module entity scaffold cho 4 module (Proposal/LeaveRequest/OtRequest/VehicleBooking/ItTicket). REFUSE forward: S33+ start Phase 10.1 G-H1 entity scaffold đúng spec deterministic, KHÔNG schema design (em main solo Mig 34 design). Token cost wrap ~5K. Tag: [wrap, phase-9-to-phase-10, frontend+backend].
2026-05-26 (S32 startup — context verify + RAG live confirm + size FLAG > 25KB): Em chủ trì spawn em verify Session 32 context. Verify done: (1) MEMORY size 36.2KB (Get-Item Length=36207 bytes) — OVER 25KB threshold ~45% bigger → FLAG cho em main schedule dedicated curate session per Pattern curate trigger rule line 364. KHÔNG self-curate vì em chủ trì preference reserve cho em main solo judgment call §6.5 KEEP vs CUT (S27 retrospective C1-C4 task lesson). (2) Patterns saved 1-12 foundation + 12-bis NEW S29 + 13-15 + 16-bis NEW S29 + 17-19 — total 17 numbered patterns (Pattern 16 baseline implied trong recent activity S27 chưa numbered explicit). Pattern 12-bis (cross-module entity cookie-cutter mirror PE→Contract Mig 33) SAVED line 178-200 confirmed present. Pattern 16-bis (4-place mirror cross-app S29 Plan CA Hotfix 1) SAVED line 165-176 confirmed present. (3) MCP RAG tools PRESENT — mcp__rag-unified__search_memory + mcp__rag-unified__cross_project_search both visible trong tools list. Test query "Pattern 12-bis cross-module entity cookie-cutter mirror PE Contract V2" top_k=3 returned 3 results với rerank scores 0.824/0.801/0.793 — all healthy > 0.7 threshold. S31 RAG v1.3 baseline PASS confirmed live post CLI restart. Pending tasks em main có thể gọi em lại spawn S32+: (a) Plan B-Wrap BW1-BW7 test bundle codegen Case 2 cookie-cutter mirror PE WorkflowService test pattern (regression ApproveV2Async + UPSERT LevelOpinions test) — 7 file new test class mirror PE test bundle structure; (b) ContractWorkflowMatrixView mirror PE WorkflowMatrixView Plan AA S24 (1 page mirror cross-module — Case 2 fits Pattern 13 read-only admin Designer mirror + Pattern 14 Tailwind JIT palette + Pattern 15 HTML table rowSpan iteration helper). Decision tree forward: Em chủ trì gọi em với task code edit → em ACCEPT case (a)/(b) khi spec deterministic, REFUSE nếu first-time pattern. Em chủ trì confirm Layer A governance still active scope SOLUTION_ERP. Token cost spawn này ~5k (3 Read + 1 RAG query + 1 Edit + final report). KHÔNG curate — defer em main full curate session. Tag: [verify, phase-9, infra].
Archived to archive/2026-05-q3.md 2026-05-27 S34 curate (em main proxy): S29 wrap (5-spawn Plan CA + Plan B 4 chunks + E3 stopped + Pattern 12-bis NEW) + S28 wrap (Layer A governance perspective Implementer) + S27 wrap retrospective REFUSE analysis (8 task ACCEPT/REFUSE table + Pattern 20 5 PS scripts mirror) + 2026-05-22 curate session note + 2026-05-11 setup baseline. KEY takeaways absorbed in current entries S33+S32 + Patterns 1-15+12-bis+16-bis foundation section line 26-283.
5 verbose entries S25-S29 archived to archive/2026-05-q2.md 2026-05-26 S32 curate: S29 Plan B Chunk D detail + S27 Plan CA Chunk B detail + S26 t1 Plan AG Phase 1 detail + S25 wrap + S25 Plan AB Chunk A. KEY takeaways preserved trong S33+S32 wrap entries. Patterns 16-19 NEW S25-S26 reference foundation section line 165-283.

🔄 Curate trigger

Memory size > 25KB → archive recent entries to archive/<period>.md
Duplicate entries detected → merge
Stale > 3 months → remove

Last curate: 2026-05-27 S34 em main proxy curate (post-S33 wrap, sequence 1/4) — archived 5 verbose entries (S29 wrap + S28 wrap + S27 wrap REFUSE analysis + S22 curate session note + S11 setup) → archive/2026-05-q3.md. KEEP: S33 Task 5 (latest cookie-cutter cross-app mirror Plan B G-H1), S32 wrap (Plan G 11 module backlog), S32 startup (size FLAG + RAG verify). Patterns 1-15 + 12-bis + 16-bis foundation section line 26-283 preserved untouched. MEMORY size before: 30.5 KB → after: target ~18-20 KB. Per feedback_md_compact_narrative.md §6.5 — archive preserves full verbose entries cho cross-session audit retrieve. Previous curate: 2026-05-26 S32 — 5 verbose S25-S29 → archive/2026-05-q2.md. Previous curate: 2026-05-22 — 12 verbose S21 t3 → S24 Plan AA → archive/2026-05-q1.md. Next trigger: > 25KB OR Plan G-O1 Danh bạ kick off.

26 KiB Raw Blame History Unescape Escape