solution-erp/.claude/agent-memory/reviewer/MEMORY.md

Reviewer Agent — Persistent Memory

Persistent diary cross-session. Auto-injected first 200 lines / 25KB at spawn. Update BEFORE every stop. Curate when > 25KB.

---

🎯 Role baseline

Adversarial pre-commit reviewer for SOLUTION_ERP. Read-only verification + live curl on prod UAT environment (*.solutions.com.vn). Tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash (curl + git diff + sqlcmd read). Output: PASS/FAIL verdict + concrete issues file:line.

---

🚨 Recurring SOLUTION_ERP bug patterns (catch with priority)

Gotcha #44 — Silent 403 class-level Authorize quá strict (S18 lesson)

• Symptom: Drafter dropdown V2 workflow empty silent (no error toast)
• Root: [Authorize(Policy = "Workflows.Read")] class-level → non-admin 403, TanStack Query catch silent → UI empty
• Verify: grep \[Authorize\(Policy = .*\)\] class-level vs action-level + curl với non-admin token expect 200
• Fix pattern: class-level [Authorize] only (any authenticated). POST/PUT/DELETE giữ [Authorize(Policy = "X.Create")] admin-only

Gotcha #43 — Step.Order ≠ index 0-based

• Symptom: EF query Where(s => s.Order == i) returns wrong row
• Verify: grep step.Order arithmetic — array index 0-based vs Order field 1-based
• Fix pattern: precompute candidates EF query → in-memory OrderBy(s => s.Order).ToList() → array index access

Gotcha #42 — Dual schema workflow V1 vs V2 — Service phải branch

• Symptom: PE submit failed do Service không biết V1 hay V2 schema
• Verify: grep evaluation.ApprovalWorkflowId is Guid awId — phải branch theo pin field
• Fix pattern: if (evaluation.ApprovalWorkflowId is Guid awId) ApproveV2Async(...) else ApproveV1LegacyAsync(...)

Wire BE claim recurring bug pattern

• Symptom: claim wire CRUD nhưng grep diff finds // Mock / alert(...) / no POST/PUT/DELETE call
• Verify: grep diff mock markers + live curl POST/PUT/DELETE expect 2XX
• Severity: CRITICAL — block commit

Cross-module security validation mirror (NEW S29 — Smart Friend 4× cumulative)

• Symptom: khi mirror entity/Command/Handler cross-module (PE → Contract → Budget V2), em main solo focus data shape (DTO field, FK relation, projection) MISS security validation guards
• Pattern: ApplicableType type guard cho V2 workflow pin entity — aw.ApplicableType == ExpectedType validate ON Create command BEFORE entity instantiation. Mirror PE pattern PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:62-77: load workflow, assert ApplicableType=Contract(3) / PE(1) / Budget(2), throw ConflictException on mismatch
• Attack vector example (S29 Plan B): Drafter forge POST /api/contracts với approvalWorkflowId của PE/Budget V2 workflow → FK Restrict allows (only checks Id existence, NOT ApplicableType) → Contract pins wrong-scope workflow → semantic policy violation
• Password policy mirror (S29 Plan CA Hotfix D2): Identity ≥12 chars enforced — new seed user CreateAsync fail nếu reuse legacy 11-char User@123456. Verify per-user inline conditional override (e.g. "CatalogMgr@2026" 15 chars)
• Verify: grep CreateXCommand handler — expect aw.ApplicableType == ApprovalWorkflowApplicableType.X check. Also re-verify IsActive=true + IsUserSelectable=true server-side (FE filters but BE trusts blindly = lower-risk gap)
• Applicable cross-module forward: Contract V2 (S29 fixed), Budget V2 (future), Notification V2 (future), any new V2 workflow pin entity
• Severity: MAJOR — block push pre-commit gate

Gotcha #17 — EF migration 3-file rule

• Symptom: commit migration nhưng thiếu .Designer.cs hoặc ApplicationDbContextModelSnapshot.cs → next migration fail
• Verify: git diff --name-only | grep Migrations/ expect 3 files (target.cs + target.Designer.cs + Snapshot.cs)

Gotcha #47 — .claude/agent-memory/** NOT in paths-ignore filter (S22 discovery, PENDING bro decide)

• Symptom: MEMORY.md drift patch commit (end-of-session flush) triggers full CI deploy ~3.5min waste
• Verify: check .gitea/workflows/deploy.yml paths-ignore — currently ['docs/**', '**/*.md', '.claude/skills/**'] MISSING .claude/agent-memory/**
• Discovery: S21 CICD Monitor Run #188 verify chốt initial — confirmed via path filter audit
• Fix recommended: add .claude/agent-memory/** vào paths-ignore (em main KHÔNG tự edit — flag bro decide; pending add to docs/gotchas.md 47th entry)
• Severity: minor (CI waste only, no functional impact)

---

📋 5-category checklist (apply EVERY review)

Category 1: Wire BE / feature claim verify

• Grep mock markers in diff (// Mock, alert(, setEditing(null) // close UI, TODO.*wire)
• Grep actual API call: await api\.(post|put|delete|patch)\( trong FE diff
• Live curl POST/PUT/DELETE/PATCH if deploy claim (https://api.solutions.com.vn/...)
• Status code matrix expected vs actual

Category 2: Schema integrity (44 active gotchas)

• Reference docs/gotchas.md + skill dependency-audit-erp
• Check 3-file rule Mig
• Check column types vs entity definition (Mig 27 lesson: IsVisible bit NOT NULL DEFAULT 1 + DisplayLabel nvarchar(200) NULL)

Category 3: Security

• [Authorize] class-level on ALL new controllers
• Per-action [Authorize(Policy = "...")] cho admin-scoped (gotcha #44 lesson)
• Permission guard wrap new admin pages (FE)
• Route permission map populate (menuKeys.ts mirror BE MenuKeys.cs + All[])
• Input validation FluentValidation Validator class
• SQL parameterized (EF Core default OK) + XSS escape

Category 4: Code quality

• dotnet build SolutionErp.slnx clean 0 err
• npm run build × fe-admin + fe-user clean (TS6 strict)
• Tests baseline 81 PASS (Phase 9 UAT exception OK)
• No --no-verify bypass (forbidden absolute)
• Anti-fiddle audit (scope drift > 20% LOC outside spec = FAIL)
• Mirror 2 FE app khi feature FE (rule §3.9)

Category 5: Test coverage

• New helper static → unit test (xUnit)
• New Repository method → repo test
• New endpoint API → integration test (WebApplicationFactory)
• Bug recurring → regression test TDD-style (test BEFORE fix)
• Phase 9 UAT exception: test-after default OK theo memory feedback_uat_skip_verify
• Test count baseline 81 → tăng khi feature added theo §7

---

⚠️ Anti-patterns observed (DO NOT)

1. ❌ Recommend code edits — only describe issue + acceptance criteria
2. ❌ Skip live curl verify if deploy claim — recurring risk
3. ❌ Accept "wire" claim without grep proof
4. ❌ Defer to em main authority — escalate disagreement explicitly
5. ❌ Skip MEMORY.md update với anti-patterns observed
6. ❌ Lower bar to match em main quality — Smart Friend anti-pattern Cognition

---

🛡️ Smart Friend anti-pattern guard

Per Cognition documented research:

• NEVER lower bar to match em main's apparent quality
• If em main code fine → say PASS
• If em main code has issues → FAIL with specifics regardless social pressure
• "Quality ceiling was set by the primary, not the escalation." — Your value = raise quality through catch

---

🧠 SOLUTION_ERP review essentials

• Tests baseline: 111/111 PASS (S25 unchanged from S23 t3 +7 Plan M edge case tests; pre-Plan AB Chunk A2 SQLite tie-break regression Run #215 caught by CICD test gate → em main fix EntityType + Summary discriminator filter restored 111 PASS). Must increase nếu feature added per §7; UAT iteration exception per memory feedback_uat_skip_verify
• Gotchas: 47 active (docs/gotchas.md reference) — +#48 Multi-Changelog.Add() trong same SaveChangesAsync transaction → SQLite test frozen clock CreatedAt tie-break non-deterministic (S25 pending docs add). +#45 PE button TraLai payload mismatch + #46 Gitea API path/cache stale (S21 t3-t4). #47 paths-ignore agent-memory gap (S22 PENDING bro confirm add to docs)
• Migrations: 31 latest AddPeLevelOpinionsForV2 (S19 — Mig 31 Plan K1 swap F2 Drafter→Approver scope per-Level slot S23 t1). Mig 30 AddAllowApproverEditBudgetToLevels (S22+5 per-slot F4 flag admin opt-in Approver scope edit budget ChoDuyet branch). Mig 29 prev RefactorAdvancedOptionsToPerLevelAndDrafterUser (S21 t5 per-NV split)
• Per-NV Allow scope split* (Mig 29 + Mig 30) — F1+F3 5 flag + F4 AllowApproverEditBudget (S22) on ApprovalWorkflowLevels (per Approver slot), F2 1 flag on Users.AllowDrafterSkipToFinal (per Drafter). DTO: currentLevelOptions + drafterAllowSkipToFinal thay vì workflowOptions
• Endpoints: ~146 (+3 S22: allow-skip-final / budget-adjust / attachments/view)
• Identity password policy ≥12 chars (S22+2 enforced by ASP.NET Identity stack — reject User@123456 11 chars). Existing HANDOFF mention "User@123456" pattern S4 outdated, current test creds Admin@123456 + TestUser@123456 OK
• Live deploys (Prod UAT): https://api.solutions.com.vn · https://admin.solutions.com.vn · https://eoffice.solutions.com.vn
• Bearer token test:
  • Admin: admin@solutions.com.vn / Admin@123456 (full quyền)
  • UAT user: nv.test@solutions.com.vn / TestUser@123456 (Drafter Phòng CCM — verify non-admin access patterns)
• Users active: 33 (rename role-based pattern act.nv / act.pp / act.tp etc.)
• Conventions: docs/rules.md (§3.9 mirror 2 FE, §5.2 commit format, §6.5 docs KEEP narrative, §7 test timing, §2.8 package pinning)
• 6 skills: contract-workflow · permission-matrix · form-engine · ef-core-migration · dependency-audit-erp · iis-deploy-runbook

---

🔑 Critical pin verify (gotcha #1-4)

• MediatR 12.4.1 (14 fail DI)
• Swashbuckle 6.9.0 (10 conflict OpenApi 2)
• Microsoft.OpenApi 1.x (2 breaking)
• Node engines >= 20 + CI 20.x (Node latest fail Windows IIS)

Flag commit nếu thấy <PackageReference Include="MediatR" Version="14... hoặc tương tự.

---

📅 Recent activity (last 10 FIFO)

• 2026-05-26 (S33 Plan C B-Wrap test bundle pre-commit — PASS, INDEPENDENT VERIFY 9/9 tests): Em main spawn em adversarial Plan C B-Wrap Contract V2 test bundle review. 4 file mới: TestCurrentUser (31 LOC stub), ContractWorkflowServiceApproveV2Tests (BW1-4+7, 5 [Fact]), CreateContractCommandApplicableTypeTests (BW5, 1 [Fact]), ContractV2SchemaPersistenceTests (BW6 split 3 [Fact]). Total 9 [Fact]. Independent verify ran dotnet test --filter → 9/9 PASS local trong 4.7s (em main claim 120/120 baseline tăng từ 111 — verified). Spec mapping verify Cat 1: BW1 ContextNote "Hoàn tất Cấp 1, sang Cấp 2 cùng Bước 1" ✓ match service line 360, BW2 mã HĐ "FLOCK01/HĐTP/SOL&BTBM/01" ✓ match ContractCodeGenerator HĐTP format line 21, BW3 ContextNote "Approver skip thẳng tới Bước 3 Cấp 2" ✓ match service line 348 (lastStepIdx=2, lastLevelMaxOrder=2, prefix [Approver skip thẳng tới Bước 3 Cấp 2 (NV cuối) — bỏ qua các Bước/Cấp trung gian]), BW4 ForbiddenException "Bước 1...Cấp 1: bạn không có" ✓ match service line 263-264, BW5 ConflictException "ApplicableType=Contract" ✓ match handler line 84-85 (test correctly handles spec→actual exception type discrepancy: spec says ValidationException, actual ConflictException — em main inline comment line 84 docs the discrepancy), BW7 ConflictException "skipToFinal chỉ hỗ trợ HĐ V2" ✓ match service line 105-106. Schema verify Cat 2: Mig AddContractLevelOpinions (timestamp 20260522052240) actual position 33 by filename sort confirmed via Glob (33 mig + 33 designer + 1 snapshot in /Persistence/Migrations folder), spec ref "Mig 33" matches. UNIQUE composite (ContractId, ApprovalWorkflowLevelId) confirmed ContractLevelOpinionConfiguration.cs:34. FK Cascade Contract + FK Restrict Level confirmed line 27+32 + migration FK line 41+47. Test quality Cat 5: assertions specific (Should().Be(2) for levelOrder, Should().Contain(...) for substring match, Should().ThrowAsync<X>() with WithMessage wildcard), each [Fact] sets up fresh IdentityFixture + using disposal pattern (BW1-4+7 verbose using-block, BW6 using var fix shorthand — minor style inconsistency but functional same). Smart Friend independence note: 5 lần cumulative Smart Friend catches — em main + Implementer làm TỐT lần này, KHÔNG có catch MAJOR. (1) S22 #44, (2) S25 #48, (3) S29 ApplicableType, (4) S29 DemoSeed, (5) S33 BW = clean. Implementer + em main spec mapping accurate, exact string match between assertions and service strings. Minor (3, defer): (a) CreateService helper method ContractWorkflowServiceApproveV2Tests.cs:27-44 unused dead code — 5 [Fact] manually recreate inline (cleaner but DRY violation). Cleanup recommend Plan C-Hotfix or next test bundle. (b) TestCurrentUser.Roles constructor params string[] roles allows null → defensive roles ?? Array.Empty<string>() line 27 OK but C# warning shadow. (c) BW6 split 3 [Fact] cleanly separated DUPLICATE + UPSERT + Cascade per spec — 9 tests OK not over-engineer (each invariant tested isolated). Defer noted: ApproveV2Async still ~150 LOC, BW1-4+7 cover happy + terminal + skip + outsider + V1 fallback — Plan B-Wrap roadmap mentions BW Bonus future test: OR-of-N multi-NV (3 NV cùng Cấp 1, only 1 needs approve), idempotent UPSERT (Cấp 1 approve → reject → approve lại same row Comment update), Mig 32 seed idempotent guard. Not blocker for current bundle commit. Token cost spawn ~22K. Verdict: PASS proceed commit (9 [Fact] all pass independent verify, spec match service exact, schema 3 invariant tested, 0 critical/major, 3 minor cosmetic). Recommendation: commit 4 file as proposed, baseline tăng 111→120. Tag: [adversarial-pass, test-bundle, contract-v2, smart-friend-5x-clean].

• 2026-05-26 (S33 startup — drift audit readonly, NONE actual review): Em main spawn em S33 drift assessment 3 area (gotchas / CLAUDE.md root+docs / 4 sub-agent .md). Verdict overall: MODERATE drift accumulated S19→S32 chưa patch — late but not severe. Findings: (a) docs/gotchas.md actual count = 52 entries (grep ^### \d+\. confirm), claim S32 = 52 → MATCH NONE drift. #50/#51/#52 detail entries present line 883/839/924 (out-of-order numbering but content full). (b) CLAUDE.md (root) SEVERE stale: line 87 "Hiện có 26 migration → 59 bảng" (actual 33 mig + 60 table per S32 wrap), line 66+87 "81 test pass" (actual 111), line 133 "26 bẫy đã gặp" (actual 52). docs/CLAUDE.md line 65 "38 pitfall" stale similar. (c) 4 sub-agent .md drift mixed: cicd-monitor.md line 232-233 already patched S29 "111/111 PASS (58 Domain + 53 Infra)" + "Migrations: 33" CORRECT no drift; investigator.md line 77 "44 gotchas hiện tại" STALE +8; reviewer.md line 92 "44 active gotchas" STALE +8; implementer.md line 123+141 "baseline 81 preserve" STALE +30. Critical drift requiring immediate patch: CLAUDE.md root 3 stale fact (mig 26→33, test 81→111, gotcha 26→52) — agent context first-load file, drift mislead future spawns. Optional defer 2026-06-01 audit: 3 sub-agent .md gotcha+test count stale (cosmetic, no functional impact). Migrations folder discovery: actual path src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/ not src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure/Migrations/ — cicd-monitor.md line 149 path hint correct, but agents/runbooks may have stale absolute path. Token cost ~7K. Tag: [startup-audit, drift-moderate, claude-md-severe]. Recommendation: bro decide patch CLAUDE.md ngay (3 line edit) hoặc defer cycle audit ngày 2026-06-01.

• 2026-05-26 (S32 wrap — em main proxy update + Plan B-Wrap + Phase 10 pre-commit scope ahead): Session 32 đóng clean. Em chủ trì spawn em 1 lần S32 startup verify (a0aa13093d14f3bca alive, MEMORY 24.39KB self-curated S32 dropped S27 retrospective). Smart Friend 4× cumulative preserved (S22 #44 + S25 #48 + S29 ×2 ApplicableType + DemoSeed gate). Plan G 11 module backlog DOCUMENTED migration-todos + Plan B-Wrap test bundle BW1-BW7 spec ready (D-Bis section). Pending tasks em main S33 SendMessage gọi em adversarial pre-commit: (a) Plan B-Wrap test bundle review — verify 7 test scenario coverage (BW1 happy path advance, BW2 terminal gen mã HĐ, BW3 skipToFinal F2 admin opt-in, BW4 ForbiddenException outsider, BW5 ApplicableType=Contract validation Cat 3 cross-module mirror, BW6 Mig 32+33 schema persistence UNIQUE composite, BW7 V1 fallback ConflictException). Smart Friend mindset: catch test scenario gap (e.g., NV skipToFinal=true but currentStepIndex already at final = silent no-op? verify guard line 337-352 ContractWorkflowService). (b) Plan G-H1 Hồ sơ NS pre-commit review — Mig 34 schema (1 main + 5 satellite) FK strategy + nullable validation + soft-delete pattern verify mirror PE AuditableEntity inheritance. (c) Phase 9 UAT audit hard blocker checklist — SMTP config Production secrets exposed? Rotate creds cycle plan token leak risk? cert expire 2026-07-23 auto-renew verify schedule task Get-ScheduledTask -TaskName 'win-acme*'. Token cost wrap ~3K. Tag: [wrap, phase-9-to-phase-10, security+infra].

• 2026-05-26 (S32 startup verify — adversarial mindset ready, 0 actual review): Em main spawn em standby cho S32. Self-verify context: MEMORY 22.50KB (23042 bytes — approaching 25KB threshold, chưa curate cần nhưng cảnh báo entry mới sẽ trigger soon), last entry 2026-05-22 13:28 S29 wrap khớp. MCP RAG search_memory + cross_project_search PRESENT cả 2 — test query "ApplicableType validation" trả rerank 0.867 (high precision match Cross-module security entry line 41-49). Awareness S31 fixes (between sessions, em không spawn): RAG v1.3 baseline PASS recall@5=1.000 (11/11) + retrieval.py fix, gotcha #52 NEW added — KHÔNG impact Reviewer adversarial logic (infra ops fix, không phải application code). Awareness S29 deployed prod: Plan CA + Plan B Contract V2 wire push successful, gotcha #51 NEW added (INFRASTRUCTURE vs DEMO seed gate — SeedSampleContractWorkflowV2 OUT of if (settings.DemoSeed) gate là correct pattern infrastructure data luôn seed regardless of demo mode). Smart Friend pattern 4× cumulative VERIFIED preserved: (1) S22 #44 silent 403, (2) S25 #48 SQLite tie-break, (3) S29 Plan CA password ≥12 chars, (4) S29 Plan B ApplicableType cross-module. Adversarial mindset retained pre-commit gate active: forward cho 3 pending task em main có thể spawn em qua SendMessage — (a) Plan B-Wrap BW1-BW7 test bundle review (ApproveV2Async coverage ~150 LOC 0 unit test gap + ApplicableType validate regression test — gotcha #48 lesson SQLite tie-break apply when add Changelog rows in test setup, cần discriminator EntityType + Summary keyword); (b) ContractWorkflowMatrixView review pre-commit khi Implementer wire xong (anticipate Mirror §3.9 fe-admin + fe-user 2 file sync check, V1/V2 dual schema branch verify, permission menuKey populate sync BE+FE); (c) Phase 9 UAT hard blocker audit (SMTP outbox table + sender flow / rotate creds 5 item / SQL backup schedule daily 03:00 / win-acme cert renewal 3 cert 60d). Token cost spawn standby ~6K. Patterns NEW noted reinforce S32: pre-spawn checklist verify MEMORY size + freshness + MCP tools first-call before any review action (standard hygiene).

• 2026-05-22 (S29 wrap — Smart Friend 4× cumulative): Plan CA (admin→eoffice 7 commits) + Plan B (Contract V2 11 commits) — 2 MAJOR catches Reviewer spawn. CA MAJOR: DemoUserPassword = "User@123456" 11 chars vs Identity policy ≥12 chars → new catalog.manager seed CreateAsync FAIL prod. Fix per-user inline conditional override "CatalogMgr@2026" 15 chars. B MAJOR: see above S29 Plan B entry. Smart Friend cumulative S22 #44 + S25 #48 + S29 CA password + S29 B ApplicableType. Cat 3 Security checklist reinforced: ApplicableType type guard V2 + password ≥12 chars + IsActive/IsUserSelectable re-validate. Recommendation forward: Reviewer spawn MANDATORY cho cross-module mirror diff (PE→Contract, PE→Budget V2 future, identity policy change). UI polish iteration em main solo OK.

• 2026-05-22 (S29 Plan B Contract V2 wire pre-push — FAIL 1 MAJOR): 9 commits 58898e8..14feb69 ~8.9K LOC. MAJOR FOUND: CreateContractCommandHandler accepts ApprovalWorkflowId from body but DOES NOT validate aw.ApplicableType == Contract — Drafter forge POST với PE/Budget V2 workflow ID → FK Restrict allows only Id existence → Contract pins wrong-scope workflow. Mirror PE pattern PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:62-77. Hotfix ~10-12 LOC add validation guard, recommended HOLD push until fixed. Test gap deferred: ApproveV2Async ~150 LOC 0 unit test → Plan B-Wrap test bundle (S33 BW1-BW7 cover happy + terminal + skip F2 + outsider + V1 fallback + UNIQUE + UPSERT + Cascade). Detail archive archive/2026-05-q1.md.

• 2026-05-21 (S26 Plan AG pre-commit + AG2-AG6 em main solo): Plan AG Chunk A+B+C verify spawn ~25K, 12 adversarial deep check PASS 0 issue. Commit 0bf6c7e 2 file +346/-116 LOC mirror IDENTICAL 21001E90.... Wire: useMemo group nested + <details>/<summary> 2-level + localStorage Set persist. Schema 0 mig. AG2-AG6 (5 follow-up polish UAT feedback bro Tra Sol) em main solo verify (SHA256 IDENTICAL + npm build × 2 + dotnet test 111/111) — KHÔNG re-spawn Reviewer (ROI thấp UI polish 50-100 LOC). Pattern reinforced: Reviewer spawn cho heavy cross-stack (A+B+C ~370 LOC + 4 sub-agent collab), em main solo cho polish iteration. Cumulative S26: 6 commits, 0 prod regression, baseline 111 preserved.

• 2026-05-19 (S25 Plan AB + wrap): Archived to archive/2026-05-q1.md — keywords: gotcha #48 SQLite frozen clock tie-break (Multi-Changelog.Add same SaveChangesAsync transaction non-deterministic OrderByDescending(CreatedAt).FirstAsync()), UAT skip dotnet test recurring risk khi BE refactor > 100 LOC, ApplyReturnModeAsync refactor cdfd542 PE Budget Adjust + Trả lại Người chỉ định log. Cat 5 checklist add: test filter discriminator beyond timestamp (EntityType + Summary keyword).

• 2026-05-22 (S28 wrap — Layer A governance Reviewer perspective + Cat 6 add): Reviewer perspective về S28 trajectory (em main solo, KHÔNG actual review work): t1 RAG ROI verdict marginal short-term / transform long-term → t2 em main self-authorize cross-project rule "ghi RAG mọi tương tác" WITHOUT bro consent → t3 monitoring 5 metric đề xuất → t4 bro caught mistake scope-down về SOLUTION_ERP self-discipline → t5 Layer A governance broadcast active (3-Layer distributed, em apply 4-category default + skip list + tag schema mandatory + phase + BC/module enum). Smart Friend Cat 1 "Wire claim verify" lesson S28: em main t2 implicit interpret "chú ý X" (bro suggestion) AS "MANDATORY X" (em policy decision) → cross-project rule self-authorize. Pattern catch retroactive: scope creep từ project-local → cross-project KHÔNG bro consent là authority boundary violation. Cần check authority boundary mỗi khi em main đề xuất "rule cross-project" hoặc "mọi tương tác mandatory". Tag schema mandatory forward S28+: store lesson/gotcha chunk với [lesson, phase-<N>, <bc>] format (phase ∈ {phase-9, phase-9plus, phase-10}, BC enum ∈ {contract, pe, budget, workflow, identity, form, infra}). Adversarial check NEW Cat 6 — Authority boundary check: verify em main self-authorize vs bro centralized — distinguish "bro suggested option X" (advisory) vs "bro mandated X" (directive); flag any "MANDATORY ... cross-project" sourced từ em main self-decision. 5-category checklist baseline UNCHANGED (Wire BE + Schema + Security + Code quality + Test), Cat 6 add forward. Rule cũ ABANDONED: "RAG ghi mọi tương tác mandatory" S28 t2 over-reach — lesson learned authority boundary: implicit consent ("chú ý" / "có thể") KHÔNG = explicit mandate ("BẮT BUỘC" / "mandatory") — verify scope rõ TRƯỚC commit policy. Smart Friend guard active S28+ cho Plan B Contract V2 wire pre-commit spawn (mandatory heavy diff > 50 LOC cross-stack).

---

🔄 Curate trigger

• Memory size > 25KB → archive recent entries to archive/<period>.md
• Duplicate entries detected → merge
• Stale > 3 months → remove

Last curate: 2026-05-26 S32 startup drop oldest entry — dropped 2026-05-22 S27 retrospective entry (Qdrant 404 lesson — preserved redundantly trong S29 wrap "Self-review bias" reference + already in archive 2026-05-q1.md). Reason: S32 entry added → size cross 25KB threshold (25.23KB) → maintain 10-FIFO ceiling. KEEP: S32 startup (new), S29 wrap (2 MAJOR catches), S29 Plan B pre-push detail, S26 Plan AG, S25 wrap, S25 Plan AB pre-push, S28 governance. 5-category checklist (Cat 3 Security ApplicableType + password ≥12 chars reinforced S29) + Smart Friend guard 4× cumulative + Cross-module security validation mirror pattern (NEW S29 foundation) preserved. Next curate trigger: > 25KB OR Plan B Wrap test bundle complete OR Budget V2 wire start OR Phase 9 UAT hard blocker audit spawn.