Files
solution-erp/.claude/agent-memory/implementer-backend/archive/2026-05-q3.md
pqhuy1987 fd0554a585 [CLAUDE] Agents: S39 upgrade multi-agent 4→7 + budget +50% + 5 RAG MCP (BVAAU pattern adapted)
Anh main yêu cầu tăng tốc + chất lượng SOLUTION_ERP: tham khảo BVAAU 7-agent config
+ budget token +50% + thêm 3 sub-agent. Adapted (NOT copied) — SOLUTION_ERP 2-FE-app
fit + giữ 6 skill proven battle-test 38 session.

Split 4→7 agent (anh main chốt via AskUserQuestion):
- investigator → SPLIT: investigator-codebase (cyan, internal SQL/EF/grep) +
  investigator-api (blue, external docs/CVE/lib/cross-project)
- implementer → SPLIT: implementer-backend (yellow, .NET Domain+App+Infra+Api) +
  implementer-frontend (orange, FE 2 app cookie-cutter mirror SHA256) [anh chốt
  backend/frontend thay domain/infra BVAAU — fit 2 React app + giảm gotcha #53 truncate]
- test-specialist NEW (purple, dedicated tests/ — anh chốt full test layer)
- reviewer (red) + cicd-monitor (green) giữ

Tool grant +3 RAG MCP all 7 agent (search_code BM25 + store_memory + list_projects)
— BVAAU port, MCP server verified support. Prior chỉ 2 (search_memory + cross_project).

Skill re-distribute 6 skill across 7 agent (xem README matrix).

Memory: rename investigator→investigator-codebase + implementer→implementer-backend
(giữ history) + seed 3 new MEMORY (investigator-api/implementer-frontend/test-specialist)
extract relevant patterns. Delete old investigator.md + implementer.md.

README rewrite: 7-agent architecture + decision tree split-routing + phân việc matrix
boundary + token budget +50% cost reality (~1.05M opt / ~2M heavy ceiling) +
anti-truncation rules (gotcha #53 5× mitigation: brief ≤8K + curate pre-spawn +
entry ≤1.5K + 529 fallback solo).

⚠️ Anh main RESTART Claude Code CLI để registry hot-reload 7 agent (per S27 lesson
model:inherit + new files). Verify post-restart: smoke spawn 3 new agent confirm load.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-29 10:42:05 +07:00

48 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Implementer — Archive Q3 2026-05 (S34 curate)
> Verbose Recent activity entries archived from MEMORY.md S34 init (em main proxy curate 2026-05-27).
> Patterns 1-15 + 12-bis + 16-bis foundation section preserved untouched in MEMORY.md.
---
## 2026-05-22 — S29 wrap Plan CA Chunk B + Plan B 4 chunks Case 2 cookie-cutter + 1 stopped E3 + Pattern 12-bis NEW
Implementer = busiest agent S29 với 5 spawn total. **Plan CA Chunk B (~10K):** 4 master pages mirror fe-admin→fe-user byte-identical SHA256, touch 6 file (4 page + App.tsx +5 route + menuKeys.ts +5 key Catalogs*), 948 LOC mirror PASS 0 TS err. Saved `pattern_master_page_mirror.md`. **Plan B 4 spawn cumulative:** (A2 Mig 32 ~25K) schema +column FK Restrict IX + Configuration + DbInitializer SeedSampleContractWorkflowV2 — **stash em main WIP ContractWorkflowService.cs** để build verify clean (em main + Implementer parallel touch BE → race condition trick); (C Mig 33 ContractLevelOpinions ~25K) entity + Mig + Config + DbSet + Contract.cs +LevelOpinions nav — **Pattern 12-bis NEW cross-module entity cookie-cutter mirror PE→Contract** scaffold 4-file pattern documented Patterns section; (D FE Workspace V2 ~12K) ContractCreatePage × 2 app +useQuery V2 + Select dropdown wire ApprovalWorkflowId, 88 LOC mirror byte-similar; (E3 stopped mid-task) FE Section 5 V2 STOPPED at "check ContractDetail type" judgment call → em main solo finish. **Lessons:** (1) **Race condition em main + Implementer parallel BE** → stash trick works but adds overhead. Forward SEQUENTIAL chunks A→B→C khi cùng touch BE, NOT parallel. (2) **Complex FE feature mirror với type extend + new component** → em main solo more reliable than Implementer khi spec ambiguity > 20% in Read-required component inspection. (3) Pattern 16-bis 4-place mirror cross-app reinforced 2× (Plan CA Chunk B + Plan B Chunk D) — verify Layout staticMap khi page move/route enhance.
---
## 2026-05-22 — S28 wrap Layer A governance distributed active
Implementer policy local apply: S28 em main solo cả buổi (KHÔNG Implementer work code thực sự). Timeline: t1 RAG ROI verdict marginal-short/transform-long → t2 bro feedback "ghi mọi tương tác" → t3 em đề xuất 2-week monitoring 5 metric → t4 bro caught self-authorize cross-project rule mistake → t5 governance broadcast Layer A active 3-Layer distributed scope-down về SOLUTION_ERP self-discipline. **Implementer perspective về Layer A governance:** (1) Pattern proven ≥ 2× qualifies Layer B nominate. **Pattern 7 per-NV admin opt-in flag (Mig 29 AllowDrafterEdit + Mig 30 AllowApproverEditSection1 + Mig 31 AllowEarlyApprove + AllowDelegate) đã proven 4× — strong candidate Layer B promote khi unfreeze.** (2) Tag schema mandatory áp dụng forward: store Pattern chunk với format `[pattern, phase-<N>, <bc>]`. (3) source_path convention: `solution_erp/pattern/<topic>-<date>`. (4) **KHÔNG self-authorize cross-project rule (lesson S28 t4)**. (5) Quên rule cũ "mọi tương tác mandatory store" — **ABANDONED**.
---
## 2026-05-22 — S27 wrap-up retrospective REFUSE analysis
Em main S27 SOLO cả buổi vì registry KHÔNG load (per pitfall VIPIX #1+#2). Retrospective analysis 6 task S27 vs ACCEPT/REFUSE criteria:
| Task S27 | Implementer fit? | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| C1 Curate cicd-monitor 72KB | ❌ REFUSE #1 (judgment §6.5 KEEP vs CUT) | Em main solo CORRECT |
| C2-C4 Curate 3 agent MEMORY | ❌ REFUSE #1 same | Em main solo CORRECT |
| C5 Audit drift §6.4 + §9.4 | ❌ REFUSE #1 same | Em main solo CORRECT |
| A3.1 Write 5 PS scripts | ✅ ACCEPT Case 2 (5 file cookie-cutter mirror pattern) | **Implementer would ACCEPT** - em main miss delegate opportunity |
| A3.2 Dashboard HTML + generator | ❌ REFUSE #7 (first time pattern, no precedent) + #2 UX design needed | Em main solo CORRECT |
| A4 rag-onboarding-guide.md 421 lines | ❌ REFUSE #2 (docs writing judgment) | Em main solo CORRECT |
| F1 Qdrant Web UI fix | ❌ REFUSE #4 (bug reasoning chain) | Em main solo CORRECT |
| F2 4 agent files fix model:inherit | ✅ ACCEPT Case 1 (4 file mechanical same edit) | **Implementer would ACCEPT** - em main miss delegate opportunity |
**Verdict: 2/8 task lẽ ra delegate được Implementer (Case 1+2) nhưng registry empty → em main forced solo.** Net loss ~30 phút time + miss cookie-cutter mirror discipline. Pattern 20 NEW saved foundation: "**5 PS scripts mirror pattern** — start/stop/status/dashboard/boot family cùng ASCII discipline + same Write-Host structure + same try-catch pattern" reusable cho future infra automation.
---
## 2026-05-22 — Curate session (S29 era)
Archived 12 verbose Recent activity entries S21 t3 → S24 Plan AA → `archive/2026-05-q1.md`. KEEP: S26 Plan AG (Pattern 19 NEW), S25 wrap (Patterns 16-18 NEW), S25 Plan AB, setup baseline. Patterns 1-19 foundation section preserved. Memory size before: 38.8 KB → after: target ~22-24 KB.
---
## 2026-05-11 — Setup baseline
Implementer agent initialized. Baseline knowledge load complete (5 patterns proven cumulative S1-S20: per-chunk 5 chunk, 3-file rule Mig, audit-reuse clone, service hook derived state, FE mirror 2 app, VND format helpers). No implementations performed yet. Awaiting first SendMessage from em main. Strict scope auto-refuse criteria active.