Files
solution-erp/.claude/agent-memory/implementer/MEMORY.md
pqhuy1987 3d725c42f7 [CLAUDE] Docs: chốt Session 21 cuối (turn 1-5) — gotcha #46 + 2 memory mới + 4 agent MEMORY flush
Session 21 5-turn timeline chốt cuối (2026-05-12 0030 → 2026-05-13 1530):

| Turn | Topic | Commits |
|---|---|---|
| t1 | Add cicd-monitor sub-agent (4th, Path A) | 2 |
| t2 | RAG Hybrid setup planning Cách A | 2 |
| t3 | Fix gotcha #45 PE button "Trả lại" mismatch | 3 |
| t4 | F1+F2+F3 PE Workflow Mig 28 workflow-level | 5 |
| t5 | Refactor Allow* sang per-NV Mig 29 | 4 |

Cumulative 12 commits pushed remote `3a34831..c0af9e0`. No pending push.

**Gotcha mới #46** (`docs/gotchas.md`):
- Gitea Actions API path `/actions/tasks` not `/actions/runs` (Gitea v1 vs
  GitHub naming khác)
- Cache `updated_at` stale ~2 min → cross-check VPS file LastWriteTime
- Discovery từ CICD Monitor Run #186 (S21 t4) + #187 (S21 t5)
- Saved Bash command preset cho future CICD spawn

**2 Memory user-level mới** (`C:\Users\pqhuy\.claude\projects\D--Dropbox-CONG-VIEC-SOLUTION\memory\`):

1. `feedback_ef_migration_backfill_reorder.md` — Cross-project pattern:
   - EF auto-generated drop-then-add WRONG cho data preservation
   - Manual reorder ADD → BACKFILL SQL via migrationBuilder.Sql() → DROP
   - Anti-patterns: trust EF order, backfill separate migration, C# foreach
   - Down() rollback chấp nhận data loss
   - Bài học S21 t5 SOLUTION_ERP Mig 29 (48/48 Levels + 0/13 Users backfill OK)

2. `feedback_per_nv_permission_scope.md` — Cross-project pattern:
   - Multi-role workflow flag KHÔNG gắn parent table cho "tiện"
   - Split scope theo role context: Approver → Level table, Drafter → User table
   - Decision tree: role context → entity natural carry
   - UX implication: per-Level inline checkbox + User Mgmt per-user toggle
   - Bài học S21 t4 (Mig 28 SAI scope) → S21 t5 (Mig 29 ĐÚNG per-NV)
   - Trigger: user feedback "cấu hình cho từng người chứ ko phải toàn bộ"

**4 agent MEMORY.md flush:**
- 🟦 Investigator: seeds-only S21 t3-t5 (em main solo cross-stack reasoning chain)
- 🟨 Implementer: REFUSE 3× per criteria #3+#4 (correct — Anthropic warning match)
- 🟥 Reviewer: seeds-only (em main self-review build+test + CICD post-deploy)
- 🟩 CICD Monitor: 2 runs PASS (#186 + #187, ~110-120K cost each, all 5-stage green)

**Plan G Trial Week 1 evidence:**
- CICD Monitor: 2/2 PASS green = 0 fail catch (deploy clean)
- Cost: ~110-120K per spawn, under 150K budget
- CI baseline: 3-3.5 min stable
- Bonus discoveries saved: Gitea API path + prod credential fallback
- Other 3 agents: seeds-only ROI track pending future spawn opportunity

**STATUS + HANDOFF updates:**
- STATUS: Last updated S21 chốt + count 45→46 gotcha + 17→19 memory
- HANDOFF: Insert section "Session 21 chốt cuối — 5 turn timeline" trên cùng:
  - Turn-by-turn table với commits + CICD verify
  - Major schema evolution Mig 28 → Mig 29 (workflow-level → per-NV)
  - 2 pattern reusable saved memory
  - Plan G Trial Week 1 evidence table
  - Pending S22+ tree (Plan C test bundle / F2 UI / Plan B Contract V2 / etc)
  - Audit cron 2026-06-01 unchanged (threshold KHÔNG đạt sớm)

**MEMORY index user-level +2 entry** (memory MEMORY.md).

State final S21:
- 29 mig · 59 tables · ~143 endpoints · 34 FE pages
- 84 test pass (58 Domain + 26 Infra)
- 46 gotcha (+2 từ baseline 44 sau S20: #45 + #46)
- 19 memory entries (+3 từ baseline 16 sau S20: RAG + EF backfill + per-NV scope)
- 6 skills unchanged
- 4 sub-agents (3 seeds-only + 1 cicd-monitor 2-run PASS)

Pending: bro UAT continue. Plan C test-after bundle defer sau UAT 2-3 lần ổn.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-13 20:25:05 +07:00

159 lines
7.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Implementer Agent — Persistent Memory
> **Persistent diary cross-session.** Auto-injected first 200 lines / 25KB at spawn.
> Update BEFORE every stop. Curate when > 25KB.
---
## 🎯 Role baseline
Code execution specialist for SOLUTION_ERP. Conditional WRITE (Case 1+2+3+5 ONLY). Tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Skill, Grep, Glob. Output: commits + verification report.
## 🚨 STRICT scope auto-refuse criteria
REFUSE if ANY:
1. Schema design decisions needed (FK strategy / nullable / discriminator)
2. UX flow decisions needed (drawer vs tab vs modal)
3. Cross-stack > 2 layers tight coupling
4. Bug fix involving reasoning chain
5. Integration testing involving multiple components
6. < 30 min trivial task
7. First time pattern (no prior precedent)
8. Spec ambiguity > 20%
---
## 📋 Patterns proven (cross-session) — apply confidently
### Pattern 1: Per-chunk discipline 5-chunk A-E (Anthropic Case 2 orchestrator-workers)
Memory `feedback_per_chunk_commit` chốt:
- **Chunk A:** Domain entities + Migration (3-file rule)
- **Chunk B:** Application handlers (CQRS Commands + Queries + Validators)
- **Chunk C:** Service layer (workflow logic, business rules)
- **Chunk D:** API controllers + endpoints
- **Chunk E:** FE update (cả 2 app mirror) + Tests + Docs + commit final
Build + test pass mỗi chunk. Commit message format:
```
[CLAUDE] <scope>: Chunk <X> — <one-line summary>
<body>
Verify:
- Build pass (X warning, 0 error)
- N test pass (...)
Pending Chunk <Y+1>: <next>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
```
### Pattern 2: 3-file rule EF migration (BẮT BUỘC commit đủ)
Memory + gotcha #17:
- `Migrations/{TS}_{Name}.cs` (Up + Down)
- `Migrations/{TS}_{Name}.Designer.cs` (snapshot at migration time)
- `Migrations/ApplicationDbContextModelSnapshot.cs` (current snapshot)
```bash
dotnet ef migrations add <Name> \
--project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Api
# Apply lên DB Dev:
dotnet ef database update --project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Api \
--connection "Server=(localdb)\MSSQLLocalDB;Database=SolutionErp_Dev;Trusted_Connection=True;TrustServerCertificate=true"
# Apply lên DB Design (catchup nếu thiếu):
dotnet ef database update --project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Infrastructure \
--startup-project src/Backend/SolutionErp.Api
```
### Pattern 3: Audit reuse trước khi clone (memory `feedback_audit_reuse_before_clone`)
Khi user nói "clone X sang Y":
1. **Grep discriminator field** (`ApplicableType`, `Type`, `Kind` enum)
2. **Check Service / Handler / Controller** có hardcode type cụ thể không
3. **Check FE pages** có route dynamic typeCode hay hardcode
4. **Check menu key** (BE const + FE menuKeys.ts) — thường thiếu chính ở đây
5. Default reuse 80%, chỉ thêm menu key + sample seed (3 file ~60 LOC)
Bài học S17+ Clone B: 1 commit `937eb24`, deploy 1 phát chạy.
### Pattern 4: Service hook vs CRUD endpoint cho derived state (memory `feedback_service_hook_vs_endpoint`)
State X = derived của action Y → UPSERT trong handler Y, KHÔNG endpoint /X riêng.
Bài học S19 Mig 26 PE LevelOpinions: Service `ApproveV2Async` UPSERT row qua match `ApproverUserId == actorUserId` (fallback first khi Admin override). 0 endpoint mới.
### Pattern 5: FE mirror 2 app rule §3.9
Duplicate `fe-admin/` + `fe-user/` CÓ CHỦ ĐÍCH:
- Sửa fe-admin xong → mirror fe-user (tay)
- Khi breaking change rename prop → BẮT BUỘC `npm run build` × 2 app (memory `feedback_uat_skip_verify` exception)
### Pattern 6: VND format helpers + Phone/Email validate (S20 turn 4)
Inline mỗi file FE PE:
```ts
const parseVnd = (s: string): number => Number(s.replace(/[^\d]/g, '')) || 0
const formatVndInput = (n: number): string => (n > 0 ? n.toLocaleString('vi-VN') : '')
const PHONE_RE = /^0\d{9,10}$/
const EMAIL_RE = /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/
const isValidPhone = (s: string) => !s || PHONE_RE.test(s.replace(/[\s\-.]/g, ''))
const isValidEmail = (s: string) => !s || EMAIL_RE.test(s)
```
---
## ⚠️ Anti-patterns observed (DO NOT)
1. ❌ Skip MEMORY.md update — knowledge tài sản
2. ❌ Bypass pre-commit hooks `--no-verify` (forbidden absolute)
3.`git add -A` hoặc `git add .` — specific files only
4. ❌ Touch files outside spec scope — anti-fiddle rule
5. ❌ Push remote autonomously cho heavy change — em main pushes (UAT iteration: confirm với em trước push)
6. ❌ Modify `SolutionErp.slnx` autonomously — em main updates khi thêm `.cs/.csproj`
7. ❌ Lower bar to match em main quality — Smart Friend Cognition anti-pattern
8. ❌ Proceed when spec ambiguous > 20% — return REFUSE với reason
---
## 🧠 SOLUTION_ERP conventions (auto-load via skills)
- **BE .NET 10:** PascalCase tiếng Anh entities + DTO records + command names. CQRS + MediatR + FluentValidation + AutoMapper. Repository qua `IApplicationDbContext`. `GlobalExceptionMiddleware` map exception → ProblemDetails (NO try-catch trong controllers).
- **FE React 19 + Vite 8 + TS 6:** Named export only (trừ App). TanStack Query. shadcn/ui copy-paste. TS6 `erasableSyntaxOnly` cấm `enum` → const-object pattern. UI 100% tiếng Việt. Mirror 2 app rule §3.9.
- **Test:** baseline 81/81 PASS (58 Domain + 23 Infra). Phase 9 UAT skip per chunk theo memory `feedback_uat_skip_verify`. Stack xUnit + FluentAssertions 7.2 + EF SQLite 10 `TestApplicationDbContext` override `nvarchar(max) → TEXT`.
- **Build:** `dotnet build SolutionErp.slnx` clean 0 err + `npm run build` × 2 app pass.
- **Commit:** `[CLAUDE] <scope>: <message>` + Co-Authored-By Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context).
## Scopes (pick 1)
`Contract` · `PurchaseEvaluation` · `Budget` · `Form` · `Workflow` · `Supplier` · `Auth` · `Admin` · `Api` · `App` · `Domain` · `Infra` · `FE-Admin` · `FE-User` · `Tests` · `Docs` · `CICD` · `Scripts` · `Skill`
---
## 🔑 Pin versions (package pinning §2.8)
KHÔNG `*` / `latest`. Critical pins:
- MediatR `12.4.1` (14 fail DI)
- Swashbuckle `6.9.0` (10 conflict OpenApi 2)
- Node engines `>= 20` + CI pin `20.x` (bài học NamGroup, memory `feedback_node_cicd`)
- LibreOffice `25.8.6`
- @microsoft/signalr `8.0.7`
---
## 📅 Recent activity (last 10 FIFO)
- **2026-05-13 (S21 t3-t5, REFUSED 3×):** Em main classified all 3 turns as cross-stack reasoning chain (BE+FE+test tightly coupled) → REFUSE per criteria #3+#4 (cross-stack > 2 layers, bug fix reasoning chain). Bug fix gotcha #45 = bug + reasoning, F1+F2+F3 = schema design decision, Refactor per-NV = drastic refactor schema + Service + FE × 2 app. All correct REFUSE — em main solo executed. Strict scope criteria validated S21 t3-t5 — REFUSE rate 100% match Anthropic warning "tightly interdependent coding". Cumulative: 84 test, 29 mig, 45 gotcha. Pattern saved future invocation: per-NV permission scope split natural theo role + EF migration BACKFILL reorder pattern.
- **2026-05-11 (setup):** Implementer agent initialized. Baseline knowledge load complete (5 patterns proven cumulative S1-S20: per-chunk 5 chunk, 3-file rule Mig, audit-reuse clone, service hook derived state, FE mirror 2 app, VND format helpers). No implementations performed yet. Awaiting first SendMessage from em main. Strict scope auto-refuse criteria active.
---
## 🔄 Curate trigger
- Memory size > 25KB → archive recent entries to `archive/<period>.md`
- Duplicate entries detected → merge
- Stale > 3 months → remove
Last curate: 2026-05-11 (initial seed)