[CLAUDE] Docs+Memory: Session 29 FINAL wrap — Plan CA + Plan B Contract V2 cumulative
All checks were successful
Deploy SOLUTION_ERP / build-deploy (push) Successful in 3m31s
All checks were successful
Deploy SOLUTION_ERP / build-deploy (push) Successful in 3m31s
20 commits S29 push 4 CI Runs PASS (#229+#230 Plan CA, #231+#232 Plan B).
2 big plans END-TO-END deployed prod.
Changes (docs + memory + scripts — CI skip per paths-ignore):
docs/:
- STATUS.md: S29 FINAL wrap header với cumulative summary 20 commits +
multi-agent ROI ~565K + 8 patterns NEW + state stats (33 mig, 60 tables,
51 gotcha, 14 AppRoles, 34 active users, 4× bundle rotate)
- HANDOFF.md: S29 FINAL wrap header với end-to-end V2 capability + pending S30+
follow-up (anh restart CLI MCP RAG hot-reload, UAT verify V2, test bundle
Plan B, curate dedicated session)
- gotchas.md: +gotcha #51 INFRASTRUCTURE vs DEMO seed phân biệt (Plan B
Hotfix CICD lesson) với decision tree + seed classification table
- changelog/sessions/2026-05-22-s29-plan-ca-plan-b-contract-v2-wire.md:
Session log đầy đủ 20 commits + 4× Smart Friend pattern proven + 8
patterns NEW + file-touched list + NEW capability end-to-end test plan
.claude/agent-memory/:
- 4 MEMORY.md flush S29 wrap entry FIFO each agent perspective:
- Investigator (25.2 KB just over threshold) — Plan CA + Plan B pre-flight
2 spawn + 3 patterns NEW (terrain map, V1+V2 coexist, reference templates)
- Implementer (35.4 KB over hard threshold, defer curate S30) — 5 spawn
cookie-cutter + E3 stopped + Pattern 12-bis NEW (cross-module entity mirror)
- Reviewer (23.0 KB compacted) — 4 spawn 2 MAJOR catches + Cat 3 security
cross-module validation foundation reinforced
- CICD Monitor (24.9 KB) — 4 Runs verify + CRITICAL DemoSeed gate catch +
Stage 4.6 sqlcmd seed verify foundation + Discovery #6 gotcha #51 cross-ref
- implementer/pattern_master_page_mirror.md (NEW Plan CA Chunk B Pattern 16-bis)
scripts/:
- plan-ca-{verify-menu,verify-perms,run-perms}.{sql,ps1} (5 verify scripts)
- plan-b-{verify-prod,run-verify}.{sql,ps1} (2 verify scripts)
Smart Friend pattern proven 4× cumulative S22 #44 + S25 #48 + S29 Reviewer
#ApplicableType + S29 CICD #DemoSeed.
Pending S30+:
- Anh restart CLI hot-reload MCP RAG cho 4 sub-agents (commit b51fc94)
- Anh UAT verify V2 contract end-to-end (Drafter → CCM approve → DaPhatHanh)
- Test bundle Plan B (regression ApproveV2Async + ApplicableType validation)
- Curate dedicated session 4 MEMORY (Implementer 35.4 KB priority)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
pqhuy1987
@ -129,16 +129,26 @@ State machine 5 trạng thái phiếu PE: Nháp / Đã gửi duyệt / **Trả l
|
||||
|
||||
## 📅 Recent activity (last 10 FIFO)
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S24 t1 spawn Pre-A — Plan AA User Workflow Matrix view + sidebar widen):** 5Q audit. Q1 endpoint: `ApprovalWorkflowsV2Controller.cs:16-19` đã class-level `[Authorize]` bare từ S18 2026-05-08 (gotcha #44 fixed permanent), per-method admin Workflows.Create. Handler `GetAwAdminOverviewQuery` KHÔNG có IsUserSelectable filter — cần ADD param + Where conditional. Q2 menu seed: `DbInitializer.cs:1429-1437` peOrder global increment (Group=1, leaves 2/3/4 cycle per type). Permission seed `line 1541-1547` cho 7 role (Drafter/DeptManager/Procurement/CostControl/ProjectManager/Director/AuthorizedSigner). Accounting NOT trong list — admin manual grant nếu cần. Q3 Admin Designer: `ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page.tsx` 975 lines, AwLevelDto 13 fields (7 Allow*), VI labels line 892-948 ("Trả về 1 Cấp trước"/"Trả về 1 Bước trước"/"Trả về Người chỉ định"/"Trả về Drafter (mặc định)"/"Cho phép chỉnh sửa Section 2 (Hạng mục/NCC/Báo giá) lúc đang duyệt"/"Cho phép chỉnh sửa Section ngân sách lúc đang duyệt"/"Cho phép duyệt thẳng Cấp cuối khi đang duyệt"). KHÔNG có usePermission/PermissionGuard wrap (class-level [Authorize] route guard sufficient). Q4 sidebar widen: fe-user `Layout.tsx:325` + fe-admin `Layout.tsx:218` `w-60 xl:w-72` (240/288px). PE Workspace 2-panel `[260px_1fr] xl:[320px_1fr]` (NOT 3-panel như memory `feedback_responsive_laptop_breakpoint` stale claim). After widen `w-72 xl:w-80` (288/320px) SAFE (sidebar 288 + main 992 → workspace 260+732 fit @ 1280px). `w-80 xl:w-96` THRESHOLD RISKY (sát 700px remaining). Q5 ApplicableType enum `ApprovalWorkflow.cs:45-50` {DuyetNcc=1, DuyetNccPhuongAn=2, Contract=3}. Surprises: (1) memory responsive breakpoint stale "3-panel" → cần update sau Plan AA. (2) Order strategy "Luồng duyệt" Order=2 first → shift existing leaves +1 → cần DbInitializer UPDATE Order existing (KHÔNG chỉ INSERT-if-not-exists). (3) Contract=3 chưa wire FE (chỉ DuyetNcc + DuyetNccPhuongAn). Recommendation: Proceed Plan AA — chỉ ADD param filter + 1 menu key + page mới + sidebar widen. Token cost ~32k.
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S24 t1-t4 post-spawn, em main solo 4 polish chunks — Plan AA wrap):** 7 commits total `a1a910f..ee0902a`: BE+Layout (`ee776d5`) + FE Page (`c667802`) + Docs (`ac2c859`) + 4 polish iter UAT (`da218f1` px-2 + `4d60598` v1 panel-per-NV + `fbbd361` v2 table rowSpan + `ee0902a` sidebar label wrap). **Pattern reusable**: `inline-block icon + inline text + absolute ChevronDown` cho hanging-indent reverse wrap (label dài về đầu hàng). Mirror admin Designer style cho user view read-only. **Sidebar widen tradeoff**: `w-72 xl:w-80` + remove `truncate` FAIL fit 44+ chars label custom Mig 27 — cần combine với `text-[12px] + leading-snug` + restructure flex → block + inline. Sole `truncate` removal không đủ — phải full layout restructure NavLink. **Memory drift confirmed**: `feedback_responsive_laptop_breakpoint.md` claim "PE Workspace 3-panel" → S24 verify ACTUAL **2-panel** (260+1fr only, KHÔNG có panel thứ 3). Cross-ref update needed memory user-level (admin trigger curate sau). **Plan AA color palette success**: STEP_PALETTE 5 màu (blue/purple/emerald/amber/pink) + LEVEL_PALETTE 5 màu (violet/sky/teal/orange/rose) — **Tailwind JIT yêu cầu full class strings array, KHÔNG dynamic interpolation** (`bg-${color}-100` FAIL — class purged). Reusable cross-project cho menu hierarchy color coding (step parent + level child distinct palette). Final layout v2 table rowSpan: Step column merge per-Phòng + Level column rowSpan per-Cấp + NV column 1-row-per-approver, đẹp hơn v1 panel-per-NV stacked. Token cost iteration negligible (em main solo, no spawn).
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S23 t8 spawn Plan R pre-flight cleanup audit):** Bro chốt cleanup destructive prod. 4 sqlcmd queries audit: 35 PE total (28 active + 7 soft) + 17 V2 (15 IsUserSelectable=false + 2 ghim) + 4 V1 (2 active + 2 inactive). FK gotcha catch: PE.ApprovalWorkflowId Restrict + ApprovalWorkflow extends `BaseEntity` NO soft-delete → hard-DELETE required; LevelOpinion → ApprovalWorkflowLevel Restrict cascade block. SQL Express limit: NO COMPRESSION + RESTORE VERIFYONLY require sysadmin. Filtered indexes (Mig 29+) require `SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON`. Cascade child estimate: 446 PE children + ~140 V2 + ~37 V1 = ~620 rows. 3 Option compare → bro chốt A (Hard-DELETE PE + V2 unghim + V1 inactive, GIỮ V2 ghim + V1 active). Plan F precedent: KHÔNG drop V1 active (PE pin → BE crash).
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S23 t6 spawn Plan P FE wire audit — confirm BE-only scope):** Em main hypothesize Plan P scope BE Controller body record drop. Investigator audit FE × 2 confirm: `PeWorkflowPanel.tsx:113-124` `api.post(/transitions, body)` SEND ĐÚNG 7 fields (TargetPhase + Decision + Comment + ReturnMode + ReturnTargetUserId + SkipToFinal). No service file (untyped object literal). BE `PurchaseEvaluationsController.cs:267` `TransitionPeBody` record CHỈ 3 fields → ASP.NET silent DROP 3 missing fields. Verdict: Plan P BE Controller ONLY ~6 LOC + no test (Mig 28/31 Domain test cover handler). Saved em main blind fix cross-stack.
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S23 t3 spawn — UAT bug Allow* flags không hiện cho actor non-row1):** Bro UAT login `nv.test@solutions.com.vn` vào menu eoffice "Duyệt NCC → Duyệt" phiếu PE/2026/A/026 (Phase=ChoDuyet, WF=QT-DN-V2-001 v12, ở Bước 2 Cấp 1 4 NV: Trần Xuân Lưu/NV Test UAT V2/Hồ Thị Nữ Nguyên/Lê Văn Bính). Admin ĐÃ tick 7 Allow*=TRUE riêng cho slot NV Test UAT V2. Nhưng FE dialog Duyệt KHÔNG hiện checkbox SkipToFinal + Trả lại 4 mode + Edit. **Verdict: HYPOTHESIS B — BE handler picks wrong slot row.** Evidence: (1) `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:765` `var curLevel = curStep?.Levels.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Order == curLevelOrder);` — match FIRST row có `Level.Order == curLevelOrder`, NOT actor's row. Post-Mig 29 refactor, Level.Order trùng nhau cho mọi NV cùng Cấp (4 row có `Order=1` ở Step 2). EF returns Trần Xuân Lưu trước (PK order) → `FirstOrDefault` lấy row đó (all-false except Drafter=true). (2) API curl admin token + nv.test token return CÙNG `currentLevelOptions={ allowReturnOneLevel=false, OneStep=false, Assignee=false, Drafter=true, EditDetails=false, EditBudget=false, SkipToFinal=false }` — handler currentUser-agnostic confirm. (3) Workflow detail GET `/approval-workflows-v2?applicableType=1` `.types[0].active.steps[1].levels` enumerate 4 slot Bước 2 Cấp 1: NV Test (UAT V2) = ALL 7 TRUE; 3 NV còn lại = ALL FALSE (trừ Drafter=true mặc định). Admin Designer wire ĐÚNG (`fe-admin/src/pages/system/ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page.tsx:889-946` 7 checkbox per-slot). FE consumer wire ĐÚNG (`fe-user/src/components/pe/PeWorkflowPanel.tsx:51 levelOptions = evaluation.currentLevelOptions` + line 343/357/371/397 conditional render mode picker + line 425 SkipToFinal checkbox). **Root cause:** BE line 765 lookup semantic broken sau Mig 29 (S21 t5). Trước Mig 29, 1 Level row per Cấp + `ApproverUsers` join table → `FirstOrDefault(Order==X)` đúng. Sau Mig 29 split 1 Level row PER ApproverUser → `Order` field collide → cần match thêm `ApproverUserId == currentUser.UserId`. **Fix BE 1 dòng:** `var curLevel = curStep?.Levels.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Order == curLevelOrder && l.ApproverUserId == currentUser.UserId);` (admin bypass: fallback `?? curStep?.Levels.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Order == curLevelOrder)` để admin xem detail không lỗi). Edge case: Phase=DaDuyet/TraLai/TuChoi pointer null → existing guard line 760-762 skip block OK. **LOC ~2-3 LOC 1 file.** Surprise: bug PRESENT từ deploy Mig 29 (S21 t5 2026-05-13) — không phải regression S23. Lý do trước đây không bắt: UAT test users (default 13 cũ) đa số là row đầu của slot Cấp (Admin tick toàn FALSE → behavior giống nhau, không lộ); chỉ bộc lộ khi admin tick CHỌN LỌC per-NV (UAT V2 S22+2 thêm 20 user role-based + bro tick chỉ NV Test UAT V2). Cross-reference memory `feedback_per_nv_permission_scope.md` cumulative S21 t5 → S22+5 → S23 t1 — KHÔNG có entry nào nhắc bug lookup BE post-refactor.
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S23 t2 spawn M0 — Plan M F1+F2+F3+F4 ChoDuyet semantic audit):** Bro UAT post-Plan L deploy 2026-05-15 ~02:00: "Hiện logic cũ là khi trả lại 1 cấp hoặc chỉ định hoặc edit là trạng thái draft -> cái này thay đổi lại nhé, các tính năng duyệt thẳng, trả lại 1 cấp hoặc người chỉ định hoặc cho edit thì cho xử lý đc ở trạng thái đang gửi duyệt luôn." Audit 4 BE file + 4 FE file × 2 app cho F1+F2+F3+F4 phase semantic ChoDuyet preservation. **Verdict: CODE ĐÃ ĐÚNG semantic mới — đây là DISCONNECT bro mental model vs code reality post-Mig 28/29/30/31.** Evidence per feature: **F1.OneLevel** `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:285-312` SWITCH branch lùi 1 Cấp cùng Step (`curLevel-1`) ELSE lùi Step trước Cấp cuối; **Phase KHÔNG đổi** (giữ ChoDuyet, line 364 reset SLA only); fallback Drafter `:303-310` CHỈ KHI đang Bước 1 Cấp 1 no further back (clear pointer + Phase=TraLai). **F1.Assignee** `:335-360` foreach Steps find ApproverUserId match → set pointer; Phase giữ ChoDuyet; ConflictException nếu không tìm thấy NV trong workflow. **F1.OneStep** `:314-333` lùi prev Step Cấp max; Phase giữ ChoDuyet; fallback Drafter nếu đang Bước 1. **F1.Drafter** `:268-275` SET `Phase=TraLai=98` + clear cả 2 pointer + SLA null — đây là CASE DUY NHẤT về "draft". **F2 skipToFinal** `:483-524` Plan K L1 ĐÃ FIX advance pointer tới Bước cuối Cấp cuối (max), **Phase giữ ChoDuyet** (NV cuối duyệt thật để DaDuyet); guard line 485 ConflictException non-admin + flag off; opinion UPSERT trước line 441-468 ensure actor's signature lưu trước. **F3 EnsureEditableForDetailsAsync** `PurchaseEvaluationDetailFeatures.cs:42-99` 2 trường hợp accepted: Drafter scope (DangSoanThao/TraLai return pe sớm line 49-51) **OR Approver scope ChoDuyet line 54-94** (V2 schema + actor match level.ApproverUserId + level.AllowApproverEditDetails flag). **F4 AdjustPurchaseEvaluationBudgetCommandHandler** `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:272-329` Drafter scope `:283-290` (DangSoanThao/TraLai + isDrafter) ELSE Approver scope ChoDuyet `:291-323` (V2 + pointer init + actor match + level.AllowApproverEditBudget flag) — Phase ChoDuyet đã handle full. **Validation Allow* flag location** `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:252-265` ApplyReturnModeAsync gate per slot per mode: throw ConflictException nếu disabled (Admin bypass line 252). **FE PeWorkflowPanel.tsx**: TraLai dialog `:331-422` 4 radio button (OneLevel/OneStep/Assignee/Drafter) gated bằng `levelOptions?.allowReturnXxx` flag per current Approver Cấp (line 343-396); useEffect `:60-68` S23 t2 fix default first available mode KHÔNG Drafter khi admin tick F1 modes. Skip Final checkbox `:425-442` chỉ visible khi `levelOptions?.allowApproverSkipToFinal` + Approve forward direction (line 425). **FE PeDetailTabs.tsx F3+F4 wire**: `itemsReadOnly = readOnly && !approverEditMode` line 118 bypass readOnly khi F3 enabled (Mig 28 pattern); `canAdjust = isAdmin || (!readOnly && isDrafter && isDrafterPhase) || isApproverChoDuyet` line 977 bypass readOnly khi F4 enabled (L2 fix). Mirror fe-admin/fe-user line 109-115 + 967-979 ĐỒNG BỘ rule §3.9. **Surprise**: "Trả lại" trong UI memory docs đôi khi gọi "draft" colloquial — bro confuse 2 khái niệm `Phase=TraLai=98` (Drafter sửa rồi gửi LẠI từ Step 0) vs `Phase=DangSoanThao=1` (chưa từng gửi duyệt). KHÔNG code path nào trong F1 OneLevel/OneStep/Assignee/F2/F3/F4 set targetPhase=DangSoanThao mà không nên. **Recommendation: LOW effort** (0-20 LOC): chỉ cần communication clarification em main confirm với bro 4 mode F1 + F2 + F3 + F4 đã giữ Phase=ChoDuyet trừ F1.Drafter; mở DB SELECT phiếu UAT confirm `Phase` column number sau click test; OPTIONAL touch up FE label nếu user thấy "Đã gửi duyệt" nhầm "Bản nháp". KHÔNG cần Service refactor hay handler change. Nếu bro thấy phiếu cụ thể về Phase=1 SAU click F1.OneLevel hoặc F2 → spawn lại Investigator audit DB state + log Changelog cho phiếu đó cụ thể (data debug, not code bug).
|
||||
- **2026-05-15 (S23 t2 spawn L2 — F3+F4 edit menu Duyệt audit):** Bug UAT prod 409a967: admin tick F3+F4 cho slot Approver, login actor user, vào menu "Duyệt" (`?pendingMe=1` cùng `PurchaseEvaluationsListPage` 3-panel), click PE Phase=ChoDuyet → Section 2 Hạng mục/NCC/Báo giá + Section 5 Điều chỉnh ngân sách vẫn read-only. **Root cause F3 = OK / F4 = BROKEN at readOnly short-circuit:** F3 wire ĐÚNG (`PeDetailTabs.tsx:118 itemsReadOnly = readOnly && !approverEditMode` override readOnly per Mig 28 S21 t4 → ItemsTab read prop OK). F4 wire SAI (`PeDetailTabs.tsx:245` passes `readOnly={readOnly}` (=true từ menu Duyệt) xuống BudgetAdjustSection, line 973 compute `canAdjust = !readOnly && (isAdmin || (isDrafter && isDrafterPhase) || isApproverChoDuyet)` — `!readOnly` short-circuits to false BEFORE F4 isApproverChoDuyet evaluate. Edit pencil button hidden line 1030 `{canAdjust && <Button>Điều chỉnh</Button>}`. Asymmetric vs F3 pattern Section 2 (PeDetailTabs.tsx:113-118). **Evidence:** FE F3 OK `fe-user/src/components/pe/PeDetailTabs.tsx:113-118` + `:224 ItemsTab ev={evaluation} readOnly={itemsReadOnly}`; FE F4 BUG `:957-973 BudgetAdjustSection !readOnly gate` + `:245 readOnly={readOnly}`; menu Duyệt route `fe-user/src/pages/pe/PurchaseEvaluationsListPage.tsx:256-261 PeDetailTabs readOnly={true}` (cùng route Danh sách); BE GetPe `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:735-770 currentLevelOptions populate 7 fields` OK; BE budget-adjust handler `:281-329` Phase ChoDuyet F4 branch + actor match + flag check ĐẦY ĐỦ + return ConflictException nếu Allow=false; BE PurchaseEvaluationDraftGuard.EnsureEditableForDetailsAsync ở `PurchaseEvaluationDetailFeatures.cs:42` (8 callsites Detail+Supplier handlers). **Recommendation:** Fix `BudgetAdjustSection` line 973 mirror approverEditMode pattern Section 2: thay `canAdjust = !readOnly && (isAdmin || ...)` thành `canAdjust = isAdmin || (!readOnly && isDrafter && isDrafterPhase) || isApproverChoDuyet` — Approver bypass readOnly khi F4 conditions met. **LOC ~3-5 LOC 1 file.** Surprise: Inbox `/inbox` route (InboxPage.tsx) navigate sang `/purchase-evaluations/:id` (mobile DetailPage route, default readOnly=false) — chỉ Danh sách `?pendingMe=1` desktop 3-panel mới hard readOnly=true.
|
||||
- **2026-05-14 (S23 t1 spawn K0 — Plan K F2 refactor pre-flight):** Audit F2 state cho Plan K Mig 31 (move `Users.AllowDrafterSkipToFinal` → `ApprovalWorkflowLevels.AllowApproverSkipToFinal` + change semantic Drafter Nháp → Approver ChoDuyet skip thẳng Cấp cuối). **Confirmed state Mig 30:** Migrations path = `Persistence/Migrations/` (not direct `Migrations`); 30 mig latest = `20260513160703_AddAllowApproverEditBudgetToLevels`; `User.cs:38` AllowDrafterSkipToFinal prop; `ApprovalWorkflow.cs:86-105` 6 Allow* props (4 ReturnMode + EditDetails + EditBudget) per Level slot; F2 Drafter branch ở `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:119-161` trong SUBMIT branch (line 125 `if (skipToFinal && evaluation.ApprovalWorkflowId is Guid skipAwId)` check user.AllowDrafterSkipToFinal); APPROVE STEP branch ở `~line 393-525` (advance pointer). TransitionAsync signature: `skipToFinal` là param thứ 8 (position 47:47), default=false. `TransitionPurchaseEvaluationCommand` ở `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:393-402` với param `SkipToFinal=false` default. `ApprovalWorkflowOptionsDto` ở `PurchaseEvaluationDtos.cs:86-92` (6 field). `PurchaseEvaluationDetailBundleDto.DrafterAllowSkipToFinal` ở line 217 + `CurrentLevelOptions` ở line 214. UsersController `PATCH /users/{id}/allow-skip-final` ở line 91-98 + `SetAllowDrafterSkipToFinalBody` ở line 105. `SetUserAllowDrafterSkipToFinalCommand` ở `UserFeatures.cs:332`. **FE state:** fe-admin Designer `system/ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page.tsx` slot label "NV #{ei + 1}" ở line 873 (KHÔNG phải "#NV {order}" theo prompt) — inline checkbox panel 5+1=6 checkbox ở line 853-933 (4 ReturnMode + EditDetails + EditBudget). fe-admin `system/UsersPage.tsx` "Skip cuối" column line 306-318 + FastForward button toggle line 365-372 + allowSkipMut hook line 181-186. fe-admin/fe-user PeDetailTabs Drafter Workspace checkbox "Gửi thẳng Cấp cuối (skip trung gian)" ở line 287-297 (admin) / 294-304 (user). **GAP fe-user**: KHÔNG có UsersPage + ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page (admin-only mgmt) → Plan K UI changes localized fe-admin chỉ; fe-user side chỉ touch PeDetailTabs (remove old Drafter checkbox + thêm Approver toggle near Duyệt button). **Drift Dev DB**: Total=2 user (admin + test.drafter), Flagged=0 — NOT match 33-user prod seed. **Prod actual**: Total=33 / Flagged=4 (NOT 2 per S22+2 spec). 4 user flagged sẽ lose value when DROP column — acceptable per new semantic (Drafter pre-submit moot).
|
||||
- **2026-05-13 (S22, no spawn — em main solo throughout):** S22 18:00→~21:00 em main solo. Cumulative state: 30 mig (+1 Mig 30 `AddAllowApproverEditBudgetToLevels` F4 per-Level slot), 104 test PASS (+20: 5 reg #44 Authorize policy + 7 ReturnMode + 7 Guard + 1 V2 actor scope reject), ~146 endpoints (+3: PATCH /users/{id}/allow-skip-final + PATCH /pe/{id}/budget-adjust + GET /pe/{id}/attachments/{attId}/view), 46 gotcha unchanged, 19 memory unchanged (recommend +1 entry — see below). Prod active users 13→33 (+20 role-based: act.nv/pp/tp, bod.1/2, equ/fin/hra/pm/qs.nv/pp/tp). **Discoveries S22:** (1) **Per-NV admin opt-in flag pattern reinforced 2×** — Mig 30 F4 cùng pattern Mig 29 F1+F3 (S21 t5). Bro corrected em main lần đầu: "phải tick checkbox như Section 2", default = admin opt-in per slot, KHÔNG = mở rộng default. Cross-ref memory `feedback_per_nv_permission_scope.md` proven 2×. (2) **Plan F drop V1 ABORTED** — pre-flight sqlcmd reveal Contract entity HOÀN TOÀN V1 chưa wire V2 (chưa có ApprovalWorkflowId column) + 4 PE V1-only + 19 PE V1+V2 mix. Lesson: drop migration cần verify entity scope toàn bộ (Contract liên đới — không chỉ PE). (3) **Identity password policy ≥12 chars** — seed 20 user FAIL 400 với "User@123456" (11 chars), `TestUser@2026` (13 chars) pass. (4) **Identity rename atomic 4 fields** confirm gotcha #38: Email + NormalizedEmail + UserName + NormalizedUserName + FullName; sqlcmd cần `SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON` cho filtered unique index. (5) **API login response field name `accessToken` + `refreshToken` + `user`** — KHÔNG có field `token` (correct prior Bash example trong spec dùng `.token` sẽ fail). (6) **PS 5.1 ASCII-only script discipline** reinforced gotcha #30: `seed-test-users-prod.ps1` viết Vietnamese names without diacritics tránh parser error. Recommend bro add 1 memory entry "Admin opt-in flag pattern proven 2×" cumulative Mig 29 + Mig 30.
|
||||
- **2026-05-13 (S21 t3-t5, no spawn):** Em main solo 3 turns (bug fix gotcha #45 + F1+F2+F3 workflow-level Mig 28 + refactor per-NV Mig 29). Implementer REFUSE per cross-stack reasoning chain rule. Investigator KHÔNG spawn — em main đã có context cumulative S20 t12 setup + active dev throughout. No findings to flush. Cumulative state update: 84 test, 29 mig, 45 gotcha, 19 memory entries (+2 S21 t5 pending), 6 skills unchanged. Pattern reusable saved cho future spawn: per-NV permission scope split + EF migration ADD→BACKFILL→DROP reorder.
|
||||
- **2026-05-22 (S29 wrap — Plan CA + Plan B pre-flight 2 spawns + 3 patterns NEW):** S29 close 2 big plans cumulative. **Plan CA (Move Cấu hình danh mục admin → eoffice)** 7 commits `06a441c..6eec8d7` push deployed Run #229+#230 PASS. **Plan B (Contract V2 wire mirror PE V2 pattern Mig 22-26)** 11 commits `58898e8..38f1c4d` push deployed Run #231+#232 PASS. **Investigator role 2 spawn:** (1) **Plan CA pre-flight audit** (agentId a7ab5576c77ee3730, ~15K token): map 9 menu danh mục terrain + GOTCHA tree-inherit Catalogs↔Master + recommend chunk structure A/B/C/D. fe-user component parity verified (DataTable + PageHeader + PermissionGuard + 6 shadcn ui). DbInitializer SeedAdminPermissionsAsync admin role grant CRUD 27 menu key. Permission Matrix dynamic load /api/menus → tự reflect post-move. (2) **Plan B pre-flight audit Contract V1 state** (agentId abf91b30391fb0cdb, ~25K token): map `Contract.cs` 25 fields (V1 only) + `ContractPhase` enum 12 values (TraLai=98 + TuChoi=99 ready) + `ContractWorkflowService.cs` 220 LOC V1 only + sqlcmd prod 7 V1 contract (Phase 2-8 active workflow) + PE Mig 22-26 reference templates + impact assessment (COEXIST V1+V2, KHÔNG drop V1) + re-chunk 6 chunks (split A → A1 entity + A2 mig). 3 surprise: ApprovalWorkflows Prod ZERO ApplicableType=3 (Chunk A2 must seed sample) + `RejectedAtStepIndex` drift deprecated + ContractType 7 variants generic ApplicableType=3. **Patterns proven NEW Investigator perspective S29:** (a) **9-menu permission terrain map pattern** (Plan CA) — Investigator inventory file paths + line ranges + component parity check + recommend chunk before delegate Implementer. ROI cao. (b) **V1+V2 coexist boundary** (Plan B) — KHÔNG drop V1 vì 7 prod contract pinned. Mirror PE Mig 22-24 spec. (c) **Reference template paths cross-module mirror** (PE → Contract V2): Investigator cite EXACT line ranges (PE Mig 23:14-31, Mig 24:14-17, Mig 26 UNIQUE composite, Service ApproveV2Async 446-634, 519-546 UPSERT, 774-783 ResolveActor) → em main + Implementer chỉ cần mirror rename entity. ROI rất cao saving 30%+ time. **Anti-patterns observed:** (a) Investigator KHÔNG verify endpoint exists end-to-end qua live curl — defer to CICD Monitor stage 4. (b) Investigator output sometimes verbose >700 words → em main hỏi cô đọng <500 next time.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-22 (Plan B Contract V2 wire pre-flight audit — Q1-Q5 + Bonus re-chunk):** Em main spawn Investigator pre-flight Plan B priority HIGH. 5Q audit + Bonus chunk refinement. Tag schema: `[audit, phase-9, contract]`. **Findings:** (Q1) `Contract.cs:8-58` 25 fields, V1 ready (WorkflowDefinitionId line 22 + CurrentWorkflowStepIndex line 39 + Phase line 12 + RejectedAtStepIndex line 40) MISSING `ApprovalWorkflowId Guid?` + `CurrentApprovalLevelOrder int?` → need Mig 32 add. (Q2) `ContractPhase.cs:14-28` 12 values ready ChoDuyet=10 + TraLai=98 + TuChoi=99 mirror PE. `ContractWorkflowService.cs:23-219` 220 LOC V1 ONLY. NO V2 branch. Match Dept+PositionLevel line 113-126. Gen mã HĐ line 148-155 trigger last step → Phase=DaPhatHanh (terminal khác PE DaDuyet). (Q3) Prod: 7 Contracts 100% V1Pinned (Mig 21 flat WorkflowDefinitionId), 6 in-workflow Phase 2-8 → MUST coexist V1+V2, KHÔNG drop V1. ApprovalWorkflows Prod: 2 rows `ApplicableType=1 (DuyetNcc)` ZERO `ApplicableType=3 (Contract)` chưa seed. (Q4) Mig 22 `20260508053749_AddApprovalWorkflowsV2.cs:14-127` 3 CREATE TABLE shared cho cả PE+Contract, Mig 32 chỉ cần ADD COLUMN tại `Contracts`. Mig 23 `20260508072821_AddApprovalWorkflowIdToPurchaseEvaluation.cs:14-31` template 15 LOC cookie-cutter rename Pe→Contract. Mig 24 `20260508074937_AddCurrentApprovalLevelOrderToPe.cs:14-17` 3 LOC. `ApproveV2Async` `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:446-634` 189 LOC clone mẫu — load AW.Steps.Levels + match actorId ∈ pendingLevelGroup.ApproverUserId (line 484-495) + UPSERT opinion (line 522-546) + advance level/step (line 605-633) + skipToFinal F2 (line 561-602). Branch entry pattern line 167-171 ternary `if (evaluation.ApprovalWorkflowId is Guid awId) ApproveV2Async else ApproveV1Legacy`. (Q5) Risk LOW — schema 80% shared. F1-F4 7 flags Mig 29+30+31 trên `ApprovalWorkflowLevels` (entity line 86-114) inherits FREE Contract. **Risk MEDIUM:** ContractType discriminator — 1 workflow serve ALL 7 ContractType vs per-type? PE chỉ 2 type. Defer Q em main. **Bonus re-chunk 6 chunks:** A1 entity 5 LOC (em main) + A2 Mig 32 cookie-cutter (Implementer) + B Service ternary 189 LOC clone adapt gen mã HĐ terminal (em main critical cross-stack) + C Mig 33 ContractLevelOpinions cookie-cutter (Implementer) + D FE-User Workspace Select V2 (Implementer mirror) + E FE Section 5 LevelOpinionsV2 dynamic (Implementer mirror). **Surprises:** (a) ApprovalWorkflows Prod ZERO ApplicableType=3 — recommend Chunk A2 include DbInitializer seed sample. (b) `RejectedAtStepIndex` Contract line 40 DEPRECATED chưa marked obsolete drift với PE line 50. (c) ContractType 7 variants vs ApprovalWorkflow generic ApplicableType=3 — future Mig 34 có thể cần `ContractTypes int[]` filter nếu Solutions cần per-type workflow. **Recommendation: PROCEED coexist V1+V2 pattern, 6 chunk re-chunk.** Token ~25K. source_path: `solution_erp/audit/investigator-plan-b-contract-v2-preflight-2026-05-22`.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-22 (S28 wrap — Layer A governance internalized + tag schema mandatory forward):** S28 5-turn arc t1 RAG ROI verdict → t2 over-reach mistake → t4 bro caught → t5 Layer A active. Investigator agent absorb 3 rules forward: (1) **Tag schema mandatory** every RAG ingest `[<type>, phase-<N>, <bc-or-module>]` — type ∈ {bug, plan, audit, schema, ui-pattern, decision, retrospective, gotcha-doc}; phase enum 11 (`phase-9` UAT current); bc/module 8 domain {contract, pe, budget, master, identity, forms, notifications, audit-log} + 5 cross-cutting {cicd, infra, rag, governance, deploy}. (2) **4-category default + skip list** — skip ephemeral state ("S28 t3 startup ngày 22"), pure file paths không context, single-file < 5-line edit confirmation. Investigator output report tags MUST include all 3. (3) **NO self-authorize cross-project rule** — lesson S28 t4: stay scope-down SOLUTION_ERP self-discipline, don't generalize policy without bro consent. **Pre-flight audit query patterns Layer A §6.2** internalized: Pattern A `lookup_gotcha_<id>` (top_k=3, narrow), Pattern B `verify_precedent_pattern_X` (top_k=3 thay default 10 — broad similarity rerank surface 3 best matches), Pattern C `find_code_symbol_<class.method>` (top_k=5, symbol-anchor). **Weekly Friday eval ritual:** Investigator support Plan B Contract V2 wire pre-flight audit kick-off khi bro launch. Cumulative audit checklist (foundation cicd-monitor MEMORY S22+5→S23 t6 10-surface-point per-NV): (a) Contract entity V1 state inspect `Domain/Contracts/Contract.cs` + `WorkflowDefinitionId`, (b) Mig 22-23/26 PE V2 mirror reference confirm pattern reusable, (c) 4 PE V1-only audit migrate gap (per memory S22+4 Plan F ABORT), (d) 7 V1 contract scope drop boundary, (e) verify 10-surface-point per-NV checklist S22+5 cumulative reusable Contract V2 wire trước Mig 32 schema design. **source_path convention output:** `solution_erp/audit/investigator-<topic>-<date>` standardized cho tag schema BC=`pe` or `contract` switch per task. **Lesson abandoned:** S28 t2 "ghi RAG mọi tương tác" rule ABANDONED — Investigator KHÔNG mass-ingest, only specific findings with full tag schema. Audit retroactive S20-S26 "Investigator spawn" claims (memory log discrepancy registry NOT loaded vs token cost ghi 28-40K) defer S28+ priority #4 — uncertainty preserve cross-session, không retract memory unverified.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-22 (S27 wrap-up em main proxy - retrospective Investigator):** Investigator pre-flight CRITICAL miss: nếu spawn pre-Plan A.3 (RAG manual control build) → would have catch Qdrant Web UI static missing PRE-em main write rag-dashboard.ps1 link `localhost:6333/dashboard`. Pattern reinforced: **pre-flight infrastructure audit MUST spawn Investigator** trước khi em main claim "X work" trong docs. Em main S27 SOLO miss external dependency check (Qdrant Web UI separate repo from binary). Anh pqhuy catch via UAT browser → escalate.
|
||||
|
||||
**Audit cumulative S20-S26 memory log entries claiming "Investigator spawn" - re-verify retroactive:** Per pitfall confirm spawn `investigator` agent type NOT FOUND trong session S27, có nghĩa registry chưa bao giờ load trong session này. Nhưng memory log S23 t1 K0 + S25 t1 audit Bug 1+2 + S26 Plan AG audit 5Q + Plan AI RAG research **đã ghi "spawn Investigator" với token cost 28-40K**. Possibility: (a) Previous sessions có registry load thành công (Claude Code version cũ hơn / file format khác / hot-reload sau /agents UI invoke), hoặc (b) Em main misattribute - actually spawn `general-purpose` agent default. Cần audit history Claude Code logs để xác minh - ngoài scope S27. **For now: trust prior memory entries but FLAG uncertainty cho future investigation.**
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-22 (Curate session em main):** Archived 10 verbose Recent activity entries S21 → S24 Plan AA → `archive/2026-05-q1.md`. KEEP: S25 Bug audit + wrap, S26 Plan AG + Plan AI RAG, 2026-05-11 setup. Patterns proven section + Active workflow schemas section preserved. Memory size before: 34.9 KB → after: target ~20-22 KB.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-19 (S25 t1 spawn audit 2 bug critical UAT — Changelog logging missing):** Em main report 2 bug UAT: (1) Budget Adjust 2×click → "Lịch sử thay đổi" KHÔNG show 2 entry. (2) Return Assignee mode F1 click → "Lịch sử thay đổi" KHÔNG show return action. Audit 5Q: Q1-DB state Prod SSH fail (auth), fallback code inspect. Q2-Budget handler: `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:379-387` **ĐÃ log changelog** EntityType=Header + Action=Update + summary diff → **code ĐÚNG, likelihood FE filter bug or UAT DB stale**. Q3-Return handler: `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:215-378 ApplyReturnModeAsync` **ZERO changelog log** — 4 mode branches (OneLevel/OneStep/Assignee/Drafter) mutate pointers only, return summary, caller `TransitionAsync:100 LogTransitionAsync` only logs phase transition KHÔNG log mode side-effect. Q4-Schema: `PurchaseEvaluationChangelog.cs` support EntityType=Workflow(5) enum but **ZERO code populate** — schema incomplete missing Kind/ChangeType subtype enum to disambiguate "budget adjust" vs "detail edit" vs "return mode" (all Header/Workflow entity cùng Action.Update). Q5-FE: Query handler `ListPurchaseEvaluationChangelogsQueryHandler:1050-1064` **KHÔNG filter logic** — returns ALL entities. FE query component unknown (fe-user source not easily searchable) but **likely filter EntityType == (Supplier|Detail|Quote)** omit Header+Workflow → Bug 1 Budget (Header type) hidden, Bug 2 Return (Workflow type unlogged vậy). Root cause B1: FE filter skip Header updates OR Schema gap (Header.Update collision: budget vs section 2 edit). Root cause B2: Handler **intentionally skip logging** (no companion audit table like PurchaseEvaluationApprovals for return history). Fix path B1: Option A (add Kind enum — 30 LOC schema+handlers) vs B (extend EntityType — 20 LOC) vs C (FE filter conditional show Budget — 10 LOC FE). Fix path B2: Add `db.PurchaseEvaluationChangelogs.Add()` per mode (15-25 LOC 1 file). Cross-ref pattern memory: S23 t3 lookup bug (Level.Order collision per-NV Mig 29) — schema Mig 29 OR-of-N refactor created similar subtype ambiguity. Surprise: `EntityType.Workflow=5` enum value design-only, unused 4+ mig history. Recommendation: B2 fix first (clear win, 1 file BE), then B1 design (schema + cross-module pattern audit Contracts). Token ~28k.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-19 (S25 wrap — Plan AB Bug 1+2 audit + 6 follow-up plans em main solo):** Pre-Plan AB audit ~28K confirm root cause: Bug 1 Budget Adjust Handler ĐÃ log Changelog (Header+Update) nhưng FE HistoryTab filter strict TraLai-only loại. Bug 2 ApplyReturnModeAsync 4 mode KHÔNG add Changelog.Add() — chỉ caller LogTransitionAsync log phase transition. Recommended fix path: BE add log return mode + FE filter relax + Decision badge differentiation. **Subsequent em main solo follow-ups** (Plan AC..AF, KHÔNG re-spawn Investigator): AC capture pre-call Step/Level state + skipToFinal comment enrich + FE Decision badge; AC2 FE merge synthetic Reject rows từ Changelog (reversible recovery KHÔNG DB touch); AD drop misleading dual-phase badges + parse semantic next-target hint via regex `Chuyển phase X → Y` + comment keyword "Trả về"/"vượt cấp"; AE BE preventive batch UserName fix 9 Changelog.Add sites (Drafter+Detail+Quote+Adjust); AF FE userMap fallback từ embedded domain data PeDetailBundle (drafter+approvals+approvalFlow+levelOpinions+departmentOpinions) — no extra API fetch. **Patterns reusable Contract V2 audit recovery + Budget changelog UI:** (a) synthetic recovery FE merge từ existing audit table, (b) userMap fallback từ embedded domain data, (c) drop misleading badges + semantic hint via regex parsing, (d) preventive batch fix systemic gap. Cross-ref `feedback_service_hook_vs_endpoint` (audit log derived state) + new pattern user-level: FE merge synthetic + userMap fallback. **Tokens cumulative em main this session ~340K (mostly solo iterations, sub-agent leverage ~62K total).** **CICD result:** 7 commits `e23f51c..506cada` push remote, runs #215 FAIL (Plan M tests SQLite tie-break re-emerge) → #216 PASS (Chunk A2 SQLite tie-break fix) → #217-#221 PASS streak. Gotcha #48 SQLite tie-break pending docs.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-21 (S26 spawn Plan AG 5Q audit — PE List tree view feedback Tra Sol):** Bro UAT 2026-05-21 screenshot phàn nàn UI Duyệt NCC flat list "đám rừng" + propose Outlook-style folder template. Em main spawn Investigator audit 5Q: Q1 prod data scale (SSH auth fail, fallback code inspect — ~50-200 projects × 5-15 PE typical). Q2 Project entity `Master/Project.cs:5-14` extends AuditableEntity với Code+Name+dates+Budget+PM+Note, **MISSING MaxLength + navigation tới PE** → ready for Phase 2 ProjectPackage table mở rộng. Q3 PE List structure `PurchaseEvaluationsListPage.tsx:133` 3-panel grid `lg:grid-cols-[340px_1fr_360px]` flat `<ul><li>` line 199-252 + pageSize 50 + filter type/phase/awId/search. Q4 shadcn fe-user component GAP **THIẾU Accordion/Collapsible/Tree/Card/Badge** (chỉ Button/Dialog/Input/Label/Select/Textarea) → Phase 1 fallback HTML `<details>/<summary>` native + inline badge `<div>` (verified S24 Plan AA pattern). Q5 Mig 32 prep naming `AddProjectPackageTable` follow cumulative pattern. **Recommend Approach C Hybrid: Phase 1 FE-only group view ~160 LOC × 2 app (1-2 ngày) + Phase 2 ProjectPackage schema (3-5 ngày defer post-UAT). Implementer Case 2 cookie-cutter mirror 2 app ACCEPT.** Token ~30k.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-21 (S26 spawn Plan AI RAG distribution research — 4 study cases industry-validated):** Bro plan setup RAG cho 5 dự án cùng máy localhost share infrastructure. Investigator deep research 7Q: Anthropic patterns + community tools + multi-tenant architecture + distribution mechanism + auth + cost + sync. **Findings 4 study cases:** (1) **Cursor** — Merkle tree + Turbopuffer + 92% similarity reuse pattern, secret key derived Git commit hash, per-team index sharing cut indexing hours→seconds. (2) **Cline Memory Bank** — markdown + JIT retrieval + git-native sync. (3) **Continue.dev Hub** — slug-based YAML config sharing centralized. (4) **Sourcegraph Cody** — interesting anti-pattern, BỎ embeddings sang Search API + graph IR scale 100K+ repos enterprise (alternative if good search infra sẵn). **Multi-tenant 3 patterns:** Single index (pool, cheap), Per-tenant isolated (silo, expensive), Hybrid base+delta (Cursor pattern). **Distribution combo winner cho 5-dev team:** FastMCP HTTP server VPS Hetzner $15/tháng + git-sync embeddings snapshots committed to private repo. Auth JWT RS256 + role scopes + document-level ACL. Cost reality 5 dev ~$20/month vs cloud Qdrant $50/month. Sync git-based weekly cron (real-time chỉ cần khi team > 10 dev). **Surprise:** Voyage AI **200M tokens/month free tier cover 5 devs** comfortably — coi như chỉ tốn $15 VPS. **Anthropic standards 9/9 matched** + community best practices 6/7 matched (Sourcegraph alternative N/A cho memory-heavy). Plan AI architecture chốt với em main: User-level Global MCP (Pattern C — 1 server localhost serve 5 project) thay vì team VPS pattern (anh single dev 5 dự án). Token ~40k.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-11 (setup):** Investigator agent initialized. Baseline knowledge load complete (44 gotchas + 14 memory entries + 6 skills + 27 mig + 81 test pass cumulative). No investigations performed yet. Awaiting first SendMessage from em main.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
@ -149,11 +159,5 @@ State machine 5 trạng thái phiếu PE: Nháp / Đã gửi duyệt / **Trả l
|
||||
- Duplicate entries detected → merge
|
||||
- Stale > 3 months → remove
|
||||
|
||||
Last curate: 2026-05-11 (initial seed)
|
||||
- **2026-05-19 (S25 t1 spawn audit 2 bug critical UAT — Changelog logging missing):** Em main report 2 bug UAT: (1) Budget Adjust 2×click → "Lịch sử thay đổi" KHÔNG show 2 entry. (2) Return Assignee mode F1 click → "Lịch sử thay đổi" KHÔNG show return action. Audit 5Q: Q1-DB state Prod SSH fail (auth), fallback code inspect. Q2-Budget handler: `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:379-387` **ĐÃ log changelog** EntityType=Header + Action=Update + summary diff → **code ĐÚNG, likelihood FE filter bug or UAT DB stale**. Q3-Return handler: `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:215-378 ApplyReturnModeAsync` **ZERO changelog log** — 4 mode branches (OneLevel/OneStep/Assignee/Drafter) mutate pointers only, return summary, caller `TransitionAsync:100 LogTransitionAsync` only logs phase transition KHÔNG log mode side-effect. Q4-Schema: `PurchaseEvaluationChangelog.cs` support EntityType=Workflow(5) enum but **ZERO code populate** — schema incomplete missing Kind/ChangeType subtype enum to disambiguate "budget adjust" vs "detail edit" vs "return mode" (all Header/Workflow entity cùng Action.Update). Q5-FE: Query handler `ListPurchaseEvaluationChangelogsQueryHandler:1050-1064` **KHÔNG filter logic** — returns ALL entities. FE query component unknown (fe-user source not easily searchable) but **likely filter EntityType == (Supplier|Detail|Quote)** omit Header+Workflow → Bug 1 Budget (Header type) hidden, Bug 2 Return (Workflow type unlogged vậy). Root cause B1: FE filter skip Header updates OR Schema gap (Header.Update collision: budget vs section 2 edit). Root cause B2: Handler **intentionally skip logging** (no companion audit table like PurchaseEvaluationApprovals for return history). Fix path B1: Option A (add Kind enum — 30 LOC schema+handlers) vs B (extend EntityType — 20 LOC) vs C (FE filter conditional show Budget — 10 LOC FE). Fix path B2: Add `db.PurchaseEvaluationChangelogs.Add()` per mode (15-25 LOC 1 file). Cross-ref pattern memory: S23 t3 lookup bug (Level.Order collision per-NV Mig 29) — schema Mig 29 OR-of-N refactor created similar subtype ambiguity. Surprise: `EntityType.Workflow=5` enum value design-only, unused 4+ mig history. Recommendation: B2 fix first (clear win, 1 file BE), then B1 design (schema + cross-module pattern audit Contracts). Token ~28k.
|
||||
- **2026-05-19 (S25 wrap — Plan AB Bug 1+2 audit + 6 follow-up plans em main solo):** Pre-Plan AB audit ~28K confirm root cause: Bug 1 Budget Adjust Handler ĐÃ log Changelog (Header+Update) nhưng FE HistoryTab filter strict TraLai-only loại. Bug 2 ApplyReturnModeAsync 4 mode KHÔNG add Changelog.Add() — chỉ caller LogTransitionAsync log phase transition. Recommended fix path: BE add log return mode + FE filter relax + Decision badge differentiation. **Subsequent em main solo follow-ups** (Plan AC..AF, KHÔNG re-spawn Investigator): AC capture pre-call Step/Level state + skipToFinal comment enrich + FE Decision badge; AC2 FE merge synthetic Reject rows từ Changelog (reversible recovery KHÔNG DB touch); AD drop misleading dual-phase badges + parse semantic next-target hint via regex `Chuyển phase X → Y` + comment keyword "Trả về"/"vượt cấp"; AE BE preventive batch UserName fix 9 Changelog.Add sites (Drafter+Detail+Quote+Adjust); AF FE userMap fallback từ embedded domain data PeDetailBundle (drafter+approvals+approvalFlow+levelOpinions+departmentOpinions) — no extra API fetch. **Patterns reusable Contract V2 audit recovery + Budget changelog UI:** (a) synthetic recovery FE merge từ existing audit table, (b) userMap fallback từ embedded domain data, (c) drop misleading badges + semantic hint via regex parsing, (d) preventive batch fix systemic gap. Cross-ref `feedback_service_hook_vs_endpoint` (audit log derived state) + new pattern user-level: FE merge synthetic + userMap fallback. **Tokens cumulative em main this session ~340K (mostly solo iterations, sub-agent leverage ~62K total).** **CICD result:** 7 commits `e23f51c..506cada` push remote, runs #215 FAIL (Plan M tests SQLite tie-break re-emerge) → #216 PASS (Chunk A2 SQLite tie-break fix) → #217-#221 PASS streak. Gotcha #48 SQLite tie-break pending docs.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-21 (S26 spawn Plan AG 5Q audit — PE List tree view feedback Tra Sol):** Bro UAT 2026-05-21 screenshot phàn nàn UI Duyệt NCC flat list "đám rừng" + propose Outlook-style folder template. Em main spawn Investigator audit 5Q: Q1 prod data scale (SSH auth fail, fallback code inspect — ~50-200 projects × 5-15 PE typical). Q2 Project entity `Master/Project.cs:5-14` extends AuditableEntity với Code+Name+dates+Budget+PM+Note, **MISSING MaxLength + navigation tới PE** → ready for Phase 2 ProjectPackage table mở rộng. Q3 PE List structure `PurchaseEvaluationsListPage.tsx:133` 3-panel grid `lg:grid-cols-[340px_1fr_360px]` flat `<ul><li>` line 199-252 + pageSize 50 + filter type/phase/awId/search. Q4 shadcn fe-user component GAP **THIẾU Accordion/Collapsible/Tree/Card/Badge** (chỉ Button/Dialog/Input/Label/Select/Textarea) → Phase 1 fallback HTML `<details>/<summary>` native + inline badge `<div>` (verified S24 Plan AA pattern). Q5 Mig 32 prep naming `AddProjectPackageTable` follow cumulative pattern. **Recommend Approach C Hybrid: Phase 1 FE-only group view ~160 LOC × 2 app (1-2 ngày) + Phase 2 ProjectPackage schema (3-5 ngày defer post-UAT). Implementer Case 2 cookie-cutter mirror 2 app ACCEPT.** Token ~30k.
|
||||
|
||||
- **2026-05-21 (S26 spawn Plan AI RAG distribution research — 4 study cases industry-validated):** Bro plan setup RAG cho 5 dự án cùng máy localhost share infrastructure. Investigator deep research 7Q: Anthropic patterns + community tools + multi-tenant architecture + distribution mechanism + auth + cost + sync. **Findings 4 study cases:** (1) **Cursor** — Merkle tree + Turbopuffer + 92% similarity reuse pattern, secret key derived Git commit hash, per-team index sharing cut indexing hours→seconds. (2) **Cline Memory Bank** — markdown + JIT retrieval + git-native sync. (3) **Continue.dev Hub** — slug-based YAML config sharing centralized. (4) **Sourcegraph Cody** — interesting anti-pattern, BỎ embeddings sang Search API + graph IR scale 100K+ repos enterprise (alternative if good search infra sẵn). **Multi-tenant 3 patterns:** Single index (pool, cheap), Per-tenant isolated (silo, expensive), Hybrid base+delta (Cursor pattern). **Distribution combo winner cho 5-dev team:** FastMCP HTTP server VPS Hetzner $15/tháng + git-sync embeddings snapshots committed to private repo. Auth JWT RS256 + role scopes + document-level ACL. Cost reality 5 dev ~$20/month vs cloud Qdrant $50/month. Sync git-based weekly cron (real-time chỉ cần khi team > 10 dev). **Surprise:** Voyage AI **200M tokens/month free tier cover 5 devs** comfortably — coi như chỉ tốn $15 VPS. **Anthropic standards 9/9 matched** + community best practices 6/7 matched (Sourcegraph alternative N/A cho memory-heavy). Plan AI architecture chốt với em main: User-level Global MCP (Pattern C — 1 server localhost serve 5 project) thay vì team VPS pattern (anh single dev 5 dự án). Token ~40k.
|
||||
**Last curate: 2026-05-22 em main full curate** — archived 10 verbose entries (S21 → S24 Plan AA) → `archive/2026-05-q1.md`. KEEP: S25 audit + wrap (Bug 1+2 Changelog), S26 Plan AG + Plan AI RAG (2 spawn), setup baseline. Patterns + Active workflow schemas foundation preserved. Per `feedback_md_compact_narrative.md` §6.5 — archive preserves full verbose entries cho cross-session audit retrieve. Next curate trigger: > 25KB OR Plan B Contract V2 wire complete.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
63
.claude/agent-memory/investigator/archive/2026-05-q1.md
Normal file
63
.claude/agent-memory/investigator/archive/2026-05-q1.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
# Investigator Agent — Archive Recent Activity Q1 2026-05 (S21-S24)
|
||||
|
||||
> **Archived:** 2026-05-22 by em main SOLUTION_ERP curate session.
|
||||
> **Scope:** Recent activity FIFO entries S21 → S24 Plan AA (10 verbose entries) — moved from MEMORY.md để giữ slim < 25KB threshold.
|
||||
> **Rule §6.5 compliance:** KHÔNG cắt narrative — full verbose entries preserved cho cross-session audit.
|
||||
> **Source MEMORY.md before archive:** 34.9 KB.
|
||||
> **KEEP in MEMORY:** S26 Plan AG + Plan AI RAG (2 spawn), S25 Bug audit + wrap, 2026-05-11 setup baseline. Patterns proven section preserved.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Archive entries (FIFO chronological — earliest first)
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-11 (setup)
|
||||
|
||||
Investigator agent initialized. Baseline knowledge load complete (44 gotchas + 14 memory entries + 6 skills + 27 mig + 81 test pass cumulative). No investigations performed yet. Awaiting first SendMessage from em main.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-13 (S21 t3-t5, no spawn)
|
||||
|
||||
Em main solo 3 turns (bug fix gotcha #45 + F1+F2+F3 workflow-level Mig 28 + refactor per-NV Mig 29). Implementer REFUSE per cross-stack reasoning chain rule. Investigator KHÔNG spawn — em main đã có context cumulative S20 t12 setup + active dev throughout. No findings to flush. Cumulative state update: 84 test, 29 mig, 45 gotcha, 19 memory entries (+2 S21 t5 pending), 6 skills unchanged. Pattern reusable saved cho future spawn: per-NV permission scope split + EF migration ADD→BACKFILL→DROP reorder.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-13 (S22, no spawn — em main solo throughout)
|
||||
|
||||
S22 18:00→~21:00 em main solo. Cumulative state: 30 mig (+1 Mig 30 `AddAllowApproverEditBudgetToLevels` F4 per-Level slot), 104 test PASS (+20: 5 reg #44 Authorize policy + 7 ReturnMode + 7 Guard + 1 V2 actor scope reject), ~146 endpoints (+3: PATCH /users/{id}/allow-skip-final + PATCH /pe/{id}/budget-adjust + GET /pe/{id}/attachments/{attId}/view), 46 gotcha unchanged, 19 memory unchanged (recommend +1 entry — see below). Prod active users 13→33 (+20 role-based: act.nv/pp/tp, bod.1/2, equ/fin/hra/pm/qs.nv/pp/tp).
|
||||
|
||||
**Discoveries S22:**
|
||||
1. **Per-NV admin opt-in flag pattern reinforced 2×** — Mig 30 F4 cùng pattern Mig 29 F1+F3 (S21 t5). Bro corrected em main lần đầu: "phải tick checkbox như Section 2", default = admin opt-in per slot, KHÔNG = mở rộng default. Cross-ref memory `feedback_per_nv_permission_scope.md` proven 2×.
|
||||
2. **Plan F drop V1 ABORTED** — pre-flight sqlcmd reveal Contract entity HOÀN TOÀN V1 chưa wire V2 (chưa có ApprovalWorkflowId column) + 4 PE V1-only + 19 PE V1+V2 mix. Lesson: drop migration cần verify entity scope toàn bộ (Contract liên đới — không chỉ PE).
|
||||
3. **Identity password policy ≥12 chars** — seed 20 user FAIL 400 với "User@123456" (11 chars), `TestUser@2026` (13 chars) pass.
|
||||
4. **Identity rename atomic 4 fields** confirm gotcha #38: Email + NormalizedEmail + UserName + NormalizedUserName + FullName; sqlcmd cần `SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON` cho filtered unique index.
|
||||
5. **API login response field name `accessToken` + `refreshToken` + `user`** — KHÔNG có field `token` (correct prior Bash example trong spec dùng `.token` sẽ fail).
|
||||
6. **PS 5.1 ASCII-only script discipline** reinforced gotcha #30: `seed-test-users-prod.ps1` viết Vietnamese names without diacritics tránh parser error. Recommend bro add 1 memory entry "Admin opt-in flag pattern proven 2×" cumulative Mig 29 + Mig 30.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-14 (S23 t1 spawn K0 — Plan K F2 refactor pre-flight)
|
||||
|
||||
Audit F2 state cho Plan K Mig 31 (move `Users.AllowDrafterSkipToFinal` → `ApprovalWorkflowLevels.AllowApproverSkipToFinal` + change semantic Drafter Nháp → Approver ChoDuyet skip thẳng Cấp cuối). **Confirmed state Mig 30:** Migrations path = `Persistence/Migrations/` (not direct `Migrations`); 30 mig latest = `20260513160703_AddAllowApproverEditBudgetToLevels`; `User.cs:38` AllowDrafterSkipToFinal prop; `ApprovalWorkflow.cs:86-105` 6 Allow* props (4 ReturnMode + EditDetails + EditBudget) per Level slot; F2 Drafter branch ở `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:119-161` trong SUBMIT branch (line 125 `if (skipToFinal && evaluation.ApprovalWorkflowId is Guid skipAwId)` check user.AllowDrafterSkipToFinal); APPROVE STEP branch ở `~line 393-525` (advance pointer). TransitionAsync signature: `skipToFinal` là param thứ 8 (position 47:47), default=false. `TransitionPurchaseEvaluationCommand` ở `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:393-402` với param `SkipToFinal=false` default. `ApprovalWorkflowOptionsDto` ở `PurchaseEvaluationDtos.cs:86-92` (6 field). `PurchaseEvaluationDetailBundleDto.DrafterAllowSkipToFinal` ở line 217 + `CurrentLevelOptions` ở line 214. UsersController `PATCH /users/{id}/allow-skip-final` ở line 91-98 + `SetAllowDrafterSkipToFinalBody` ở line 105. `SetUserAllowDrafterSkipToFinalCommand` ở `UserFeatures.cs:332`. **FE state:** fe-admin Designer `system/ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page.tsx` slot label "NV #{ei + 1}" ở line 873 (KHÔNG phải "#NV {order}" theo prompt) — inline checkbox panel 5+1=6 checkbox ở line 853-933 (4 ReturnMode + EditDetails + EditBudget). fe-admin `system/UsersPage.tsx` "Skip cuối" column line 306-318 + FastForward button toggle line 365-372 + allowSkipMut hook line 181-186. fe-admin/fe-user PeDetailTabs Drafter Workspace checkbox "Gửi thẳng Cấp cuối (skip trung gian)" ở line 287-297 (admin) / 294-304 (user). **GAP fe-user**: KHÔNG có UsersPage + ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page (admin-only mgmt) → Plan K UI changes localized fe-admin chỉ; fe-user side chỉ touch PeDetailTabs (remove old Drafter checkbox + thêm Approver toggle near Duyệt button). **Drift Dev DB**: Total=2 user (admin + test.drafter), Flagged=0 — NOT match 33-user prod seed. **Prod actual**: Total=33 / Flagged=4 (NOT 2 per S22+2 spec). 4 user flagged sẽ lose value when DROP column — acceptable per new semantic (Drafter pre-submit moot).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S23 t2 spawn L2 — F3+F4 edit menu Duyệt audit)
|
||||
|
||||
Bug UAT prod 409a967: admin tick F3+F4 cho slot Approver, login actor user, vào menu "Duyệt" (`?pendingMe=1` cùng `PurchaseEvaluationsListPage` 3-panel), click PE Phase=ChoDuyet → Section 2 Hạng mục/NCC/Báo giá + Section 5 Điều chỉnh ngân sách vẫn read-only. **Root cause F3 = OK / F4 = BROKEN at readOnly short-circuit:** F3 wire ĐÚNG (`PeDetailTabs.tsx:118 itemsReadOnly = readOnly && !approverEditMode` override readOnly per Mig 28 S21 t4 → ItemsTab read prop OK). F4 wire SAI (`PeDetailTabs.tsx:245` passes `readOnly={readOnly}` (=true từ menu Duyệt) xuống BudgetAdjustSection, line 973 compute `canAdjust = !readOnly && (isAdmin || (isDrafter && isDrafterPhase) || isApproverChoDuyet)` — `!readOnly` short-circuits to false BEFORE F4 isApproverChoDuyet evaluate. Edit pencil button hidden line 1030 `{canAdjust && <Button>Điều chỉnh</Button>}`. Asymmetric vs F3 pattern Section 2 (PeDetailTabs.tsx:113-118). **Evidence:** FE F3 OK `fe-user/src/components/pe/PeDetailTabs.tsx:113-118` + `:224 ItemsTab ev={evaluation} readOnly={itemsReadOnly}`; FE F4 BUG `:957-973 BudgetAdjustSection !readOnly gate` + `:245 readOnly={readOnly}`; menu Duyệt route `fe-user/src/pages/pe/PurchaseEvaluationsListPage.tsx:256-261 PeDetailTabs readOnly={true}` (cùng route Danh sách); BE GetPe `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:735-770 currentLevelOptions populate 7 fields` OK; BE budget-adjust handler `:281-329` Phase ChoDuyet F4 branch + actor match + flag check ĐẦY ĐỦ + return ConflictException nếu Allow=false; BE PurchaseEvaluationDraftGuard.EnsureEditableForDetailsAsync ở `PurchaseEvaluationDetailFeatures.cs:42` (8 callsites Detail+Supplier handlers). **Recommendation:** Fix `BudgetAdjustSection` line 973 mirror approverEditMode pattern Section 2: thay `canAdjust = !readOnly && (isAdmin || ...)` thành `canAdjust = isAdmin || (!readOnly && isDrafter && isDrafterPhase) || isApproverChoDuyet` — Approver bypass readOnly khi F4 conditions met. **LOC ~3-5 LOC 1 file.** Surprise: Inbox `/inbox` route (InboxPage.tsx) navigate sang `/purchase-evaluations/:id` (mobile DetailPage route, default readOnly=false) — chỉ Danh sách `?pendingMe=1` desktop 3-panel mới hard readOnly=true.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S23 t2 spawn M0 — Plan M F1+F2+F3+F4 ChoDuyet semantic audit)
|
||||
|
||||
Bro UAT post-Plan L deploy 2026-05-15 ~02:00: "Hiện logic cũ là khi trả lại 1 cấp hoặc chỉ định hoặc edit là trạng thái draft -> cái này thay đổi lại nhé, các tính năng duyệt thẳng, trả lại 1 cấp hoặc người chỉ định hoặc cho edit thì cho xử lý đc ở trạng thái đang gửi duyệt luôn." Audit 4 BE file + 4 FE file × 2 app cho F1+F2+F3+F4 phase semantic ChoDuyet preservation. **Verdict: CODE ĐÃ ĐÚNG semantic mới — đây là DISCONNECT bro mental model vs code reality post-Mig 28/29/30/31.** Evidence per feature: **F1.OneLevel** `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:285-312` SWITCH branch lùi 1 Cấp cùng Step (`curLevel-1`) ELSE lùi Step trước Cấp cuối; **Phase KHÔNG đổi** (giữ ChoDuyet, line 364 reset SLA only); fallback Drafter `:303-310` CHỈ KHI đang Bước 1 Cấp 1 no further back (clear pointer + Phase=TraLai). **F1.Assignee** `:335-360` foreach Steps find ApproverUserId match → set pointer; Phase giữ ChoDuyet; ConflictException nếu không tìm thấy NV trong workflow. **F1.OneStep** `:314-333` lùi prev Step Cấp max; Phase giữ ChoDuyet; fallback Drafter nếu đang Bước 1. **F1.Drafter** `:268-275` SET `Phase=TraLai=98` + clear cả 2 pointer + SLA null — đây là CASE DUY NHẤT về "draft". **F2 skipToFinal** `:483-524` Plan K L1 ĐÃ FIX advance pointer tới Bước cuối Cấp cuối (max), **Phase giữ ChoDuyet** (NV cuối duyệt thật để DaDuyet); guard line 485 ConflictException non-admin + flag off; opinion UPSERT trước line 441-468 ensure actor's signature lưu trước. **F3 EnsureEditableForDetailsAsync** `PurchaseEvaluationDetailFeatures.cs:42-99` 2 trường hợp accepted: Drafter scope (DangSoanThao/TraLai return pe sớm line 49-51) **OR Approver scope ChoDuyet line 54-94** (V2 schema + actor match level.ApproverUserId + level.AllowApproverEditDetails flag). **F4 AdjustPurchaseEvaluationBudgetCommandHandler** `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:272-329` Drafter scope `:283-290` (DangSoanThao/TraLai + isDrafter) ELSE Approver scope ChoDuyet `:291-323` (V2 + pointer init + actor match + level.AllowApproverEditBudget flag) — Phase ChoDuyet đã handle full. **Validation Allow* flag location** `PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.cs:252-265` ApplyReturnModeAsync gate per slot per mode: throw ConflictException nếu disabled (Admin bypass line 252). **FE PeWorkflowPanel.tsx**: TraLai dialog `:331-422` 4 radio button (OneLevel/OneStep/Assignee/Drafter) gated bằng `levelOptions?.allowReturnXxx` flag per current Approver Cấp (line 343-396); useEffect `:60-68` S23 t2 fix default first available mode KHÔNG Drafter khi admin tick F1 modes. Skip Final checkbox `:425-442` chỉ visible khi `levelOptions?.allowApproverSkipToFinal` + Approve forward direction (line 425). **FE PeDetailTabs.tsx F3+F4 wire**: `itemsReadOnly = readOnly && !approverEditMode` line 118 bypass readOnly khi F3 enabled (Mig 28 pattern); `canAdjust = isAdmin || (!readOnly && isDrafter && isDrafterPhase) || isApproverChoDuyet` line 977 bypass readOnly khi F4 enabled (L2 fix). Mirror fe-admin/fe-user line 109-115 + 967-979 ĐỒNG BỘ rule §3.9. **Surprise**: "Trả lại" trong UI memory docs đôi khi gọi "draft" colloquial — bro confuse 2 khái niệm `Phase=TraLai=98` (Drafter sửa rồi gửi LẠI từ Step 0) vs `Phase=DangSoanThao=1` (chưa từng gửi duyệt). KHÔNG code path nào trong F1 OneLevel/OneStep/Assignee/F2/F3/F4 set targetPhase=DangSoanThao mà không nên. **Recommendation: LOW effort** (0-20 LOC): chỉ cần communication clarification em main confirm với bro 4 mode F1 + F2 + F3 + F4 đã giữ Phase=ChoDuyet trừ F1.Drafter; mở DB SELECT phiếu UAT confirm `Phase` column number sau click test; OPTIONAL touch up FE label nếu user thấy "Đã gửi duyệt" nhầm "Bản nháp". KHÔNG cần Service refactor hay handler change. Nếu bro thấy phiếu cụ thể về Phase=1 SAU click F1.OneLevel hoặc F2 → spawn lại Investigator audit DB state + log Changelog cho phiếu đó cụ thể (data debug, not code bug).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S23 t3 spawn — UAT bug Allow* flags không hiện cho actor non-row1)
|
||||
|
||||
Bro UAT login `nv.test@solutions.com.vn` vào menu eoffice "Duyệt NCC → Duyệt" phiếu PE/2026/A/026 (Phase=ChoDuyet, WF=QT-DN-V2-001 v12, ở Bước 2 Cấp 1 4 NV: Trần Xuân Lưu/NV Test UAT V2/Hồ Thị Nữ Nguyên/Lê Văn Bính). Admin ĐÃ tick 7 Allow*=TRUE riêng cho slot NV Test UAT V2. Nhưng FE dialog Duyệt KHÔNG hiện checkbox SkipToFinal + Trả lại 4 mode + Edit. **Verdict: HYPOTHESIS B — BE handler picks wrong slot row.** Evidence: (1) `PurchaseEvaluationFeatures.cs:765` `var curLevel = curStep?.Levels.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Order == curLevelOrder);` — match FIRST row có `Level.Order == curLevelOrder`, NOT actor's row. Post-Mig 29 refactor, Level.Order trùng nhau cho mọi NV cùng Cấp (4 row có `Order=1` ở Step 2). EF returns Trần Xuân Lưu trước (PK order) → `FirstOrDefault` lấy row đó (all-false except Drafter=true). (2) API curl admin token + nv.test token return CÙNG `currentLevelOptions={ allowReturnOneLevel=false, OneStep=false, Assignee=false, Drafter=true, EditDetails=false, EditBudget=false, SkipToFinal=false }` — handler currentUser-agnostic confirm. (3) Workflow detail GET `/approval-workflows-v2?applicableType=1` `.types[0].active.steps[1].levels` enumerate 4 slot Bước 2 Cấp 1: NV Test (UAT V2) = ALL 7 TRUE; 3 NV còn lại = ALL FALSE (trừ Drafter=true mặc định). Admin Designer wire ĐÚNG (`fe-admin/src/pages/system/ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page.tsx:889-946` 7 checkbox per-slot). FE consumer wire ĐÚNG (`fe-user/src/components/pe/PeWorkflowPanel.tsx:51 levelOptions = evaluation.currentLevelOptions` + line 343/357/371/397 conditional render mode picker + line 425 SkipToFinal checkbox). **Root cause:** BE line 765 lookup semantic broken sau Mig 29 (S21 t5). Trước Mig 29, 1 Level row per Cấp + `ApproverUsers` join table → `FirstOrDefault(Order==X)` đúng. Sau Mig 29 split 1 Level row PER ApproverUser → `Order` field collide → cần match thêm `ApproverUserId == currentUser.UserId`. **Fix BE 1 dòng:** `var curLevel = curStep?.Levels.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Order == curLevelOrder && l.ApproverUserId == currentUser.UserId);` (admin bypass: fallback `?? curStep?.Levels.FirstOrDefault(l => l.Order == curLevelOrder)` để admin xem detail không lỗi). Edge case: Phase=DaDuyet/TraLai/TuChoi pointer null → existing guard line 760-762 skip block OK. **LOC ~2-3 LOC 1 file.** Surprise: bug PRESENT từ deploy Mig 29 (S21 t5 2026-05-13) — không phải regression S23. Lý do trước đây không bắt: UAT test users (default 13 cũ) đa số là row đầu của slot Cấp (Admin tick toàn FALSE → behavior giống nhau, không lộ); chỉ bộc lộ khi admin tick CHỌN LỌC per-NV (UAT V2 S22+2 thêm 20 user role-based + bro tick chỉ NV Test UAT V2). Cross-reference memory `feedback_per_nv_permission_scope.md` cumulative S21 t5 → S22+5 → S23 t1 — KHÔNG có entry nào nhắc bug lookup BE post-refactor.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S23 t6 spawn Plan P FE wire audit — confirm BE-only scope)
|
||||
|
||||
Em main hypothesize Plan P scope BE Controller body record drop. Investigator audit FE × 2 confirm: `PeWorkflowPanel.tsx:113-124` `api.post(/transitions, body)` SEND ĐÚNG 7 fields (TargetPhase + Decision + Comment + ReturnMode + ReturnTargetUserId + SkipToFinal). No service file (untyped object literal). BE `PurchaseEvaluationsController.cs:267` `TransitionPeBody` record CHỈ 3 fields → ASP.NET silent DROP 3 missing fields. Verdict: Plan P BE Controller ONLY ~6 LOC + no test (Mig 28/31 Domain test cover handler). Saved em main blind fix cross-stack.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S23 t8 spawn Plan R pre-flight cleanup audit)
|
||||
|
||||
Bro chốt cleanup destructive prod. 4 sqlcmd queries audit: 35 PE total (28 active + 7 soft) + 17 V2 (15 IsUserSelectable=false + 2 ghim) + 4 V1 (2 active + 2 inactive). FK gotcha catch: PE.ApprovalWorkflowId Restrict + ApprovalWorkflow extends `BaseEntity` NO soft-delete → hard-DELETE required; LevelOpinion → ApprovalWorkflowLevel Restrict cascade block. SQL Express limit: NO COMPRESSION + RESTORE VERIFYONLY require sysadmin. Filtered indexes (Mig 29+) require `SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON`. Cascade child estimate: 446 PE children + ~140 V2 + ~37 V1 = ~620 rows. 3 Option compare → bro chốt A (Hard-DELETE PE + V2 unghim + V1 inactive, GIỮ V2 ghim + V1 active). Plan F precedent: KHÔNG drop V1 active (PE pin → BE crash).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S24 t1 spawn Pre-A — Plan AA User Workflow Matrix view + sidebar widen)
|
||||
|
||||
5Q audit. Q1 endpoint: `ApprovalWorkflowsV2Controller.cs:16-19` đã class-level `[Authorize]` bare từ S18 2026-05-08 (gotcha #44 fixed permanent), per-method admin Workflows.Create. Handler `GetAwAdminOverviewQuery` KHÔNG có IsUserSelectable filter — cần ADD param + Where conditional. Q2 menu seed: `DbInitializer.cs:1429-1437` peOrder global increment (Group=1, leaves 2/3/4 cycle per type). Permission seed `line 1541-1547` cho 7 role (Drafter/DeptManager/Procurement/CostControl/ProjectManager/Director/AuthorizedSigner). Accounting NOT trong list — admin manual grant nếu cần. Q3 Admin Designer: `ApprovalWorkflowsV2Page.tsx` 975 lines, AwLevelDto 13 fields (7 Allow*), VI labels line 892-948 ("Trả về 1 Cấp trước"/"Trả về 1 Bước trước"/"Trả về Người chỉ định"/"Trả về Drafter (mặc định)"/"Cho phép chỉnh sửa Section 2 (Hạng mục/NCC/Báo giá) lúc đang duyệt"/"Cho phép chỉnh sửa Section ngân sách lúc đang duyệt"/"Cho phép duyệt thẳng Cấp cuối khi đang duyệt"). KHÔNG có usePermission/PermissionGuard wrap (class-level [Authorize] route guard sufficient). Q4 sidebar widen: fe-user `Layout.tsx:325` + fe-admin `Layout.tsx:218` `w-60 xl:w-72` (240/288px). PE Workspace 2-panel `[260px_1fr] xl:[320px_1fr]` (NOT 3-panel như memory `feedback_responsive_laptop_breakpoint` stale claim). After widen `w-72 xl:w-80` (288/320px) SAFE (sidebar 288 + main 992 → workspace 260+732 fit @ 1280px). `w-80 xl:w-96` THRESHOLD RISKY (sát 700px remaining). Q5 ApplicableType enum `ApprovalWorkflow.cs:45-50` {DuyetNcc=1, DuyetNccPhuongAn=2, Contract=3}. Surprises: (1) memory responsive breakpoint stale "3-panel" → cần update sau Plan AA. (2) Order strategy "Luồng duyệt" Order=2 first → shift existing leaves +1 → cần DbInitializer UPDATE Order existing (KHÔNG chỉ INSERT-if-not-exists). (3) Contract=3 chưa wire FE (chỉ DuyetNcc + DuyetNccPhuongAn). Recommendation: Proceed Plan AA — chỉ ADD param filter + 1 menu key + page mới + sidebar widen. Token cost ~32k.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2026-05-15 (S24 t1-t4 post-spawn, em main solo 4 polish chunks — Plan AA wrap)
|
||||
|
||||
7 commits total `a1a910f..ee0902a`: BE+Layout (`ee776d5`) + FE Page (`c667802`) + Docs (`ac2c859`) + 4 polish iter UAT (`da218f1` px-2 + `4d60598` v1 panel-per-NV + `fbbd361` v2 table rowSpan + `ee0902a` sidebar label wrap). **Pattern reusable**: `inline-block icon + inline text + absolute ChevronDown` cho hanging-indent reverse wrap (label dài về đầu hàng). Mirror admin Designer style cho user view read-only. **Sidebar widen tradeoff**: `w-72 xl:w-80` + remove `truncate` FAIL fit 44+ chars label custom Mig 27 — cần combine với `text-[12px] + leading-snug` + restructure flex → block + inline. Sole `truncate` removal không đủ — phải full layout restructure NavLink. **Memory drift confirmed**: `feedback_responsive_laptop_breakpoint.md` claim "PE Workspace 3-panel" → S24 verify ACTUAL **2-panel** (260+1fr only, KHÔNG có panel thứ 3). Cross-ref update needed memory user-level (admin trigger curate sau). **Plan AA color palette success**: STEP_PALETTE 5 màu (blue/purple/emerald/amber/pink) + LEVEL_PALETTE 5 màu (violet/sky/teal/orange/rose) — **Tailwind JIT yêu cầu full class strings array, KHÔNG dynamic interpolation** (`bg-${color}-100` FAIL — class purged). Reusable cross-project cho menu hierarchy color coding (step parent + level child distinct palette). Final layout v2 table rowSpan: Step column merge per-Phòng + Level column rowSpan per-Cấp + NV column 1-row-per-approver, đẹp hơn v1 panel-per-NV stacked. Token cost iteration negligible (em main solo, no spawn).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user