[CLAUDE] PurchaseEvaluation: Chunk A — BE guard target TraLai/TuChoi BẮT BUỘC decision=Reject + 3 regression test
Defense-in-depth chặn FE inconsistency (gotcha #45 — Session 21 turn 3). Bug pattern: button "← Trả lại" trong PeWorkflowPanel.tsx gửi decision=Approve khi target=TraLai do `isReject` local var thiếu nhánh TraLai → BE skip Reject branch → enter APPROVE STEP → ApproveV2Async UPSERT opinion = "đã duyệt" + advance Cấp. User UAT thấy: "Trả về nhưng hệ thống vẫn duyệt". BE guard: - Service `TransitionAsync` thêm early check sau set isAdmin/isSystem - targetPhase ∈ {TraLai, TuChoi} && decision != Reject → throw ConflictException - Boundary protection cho mọi caller tương lai (API client / mobile / cron) Tests (Infra suite +3): - TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState - TransitionAsync_TargetTuChoi_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState - TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithRejectDecision_SetsPhaseTraLai (happy path) + NoOpNotificationService stub reusable cho future PE service tests Verify: - dotnet test SolutionErp.slnx → 84 PASS (58 Domain + 26 Infra = +3 from 81 baseline) - Build pass (0 err, 2 warn CS8602 pre-existing DocxRenderer) Pending Chunk B: FE fix PeWorkflowPanel.tsx isReject + dialog isSendBack mirror 2 app (fe-admin + fe-user) — sync với BE guard rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@ -47,6 +47,26 @@ public class PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService(
|
||||
var isAdmin = actorRoles.Contains(AppRoles.Admin);
|
||||
var isSystem = actorUserId is null && decision == ApprovalDecision.AutoApprove;
|
||||
|
||||
// ===== GUARD: targetPhase TraLai/TuChoi BẮT BUỘC decision=Reject =====
|
||||
// Defense-in-depth chặn FE inconsistency (gotcha #45 — Session 21 turn 3):
|
||||
// Bug: button "← Trả lại" trong PeWorkflowPanel.tsx gửi decision=Approve
|
||||
// khi target=TraLai do `isReject` local var thiếu nhánh TraLai. BE nhận
|
||||
// payload sẽ skip Reject branch → enter APPROVE STEP → ApproveV2Async
|
||||
// UPSERT opinion = "đã duyệt" + advance Cấp. User UAT thấy: "Trả về
|
||||
// nhưng hệ thống vẫn duyệt".
|
||||
// FE fix song song trong fe-admin + fe-user (rule §3.9 mirror 2 app).
|
||||
// Guard này KHÔNG xoá khi FE fix — boundary protection cho mọi caller
|
||||
// tương lai (API client / mobile app / cron retry).
|
||||
if ((targetPhase == PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai
|
||||
|| targetPhase == PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TuChoi)
|
||||
&& decision != ApprovalDecision.Reject)
|
||||
{
|
||||
throw new ConflictException(
|
||||
$"Transition tới {targetPhase} BẮT BUỘC decision=Reject (nhận {decision}). " +
|
||||
"Báo lỗi caller — payload mismatch giữa target phase và decision " +
|
||||
"(xem gotcha #45 + docs/workflow-contract.md).");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ===== REJECT BRANCH =====
|
||||
if (decision == ApprovalDecision.Reject)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
|
||||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity;
|
||||
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Application.Common.Exceptions;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Application.Notifications;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Domain.Common;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Domain.Contracts; // ApprovalDecision enum (shared HĐ/PE)
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Domain.Identity;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Domain.Notifications;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Domain.PurchaseEvaluations;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Services;
|
||||
using SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests.Common;
|
||||
|
||||
namespace SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests.Services;
|
||||
|
||||
// Regression test for Session 21 turn 3 bug — gotcha #45:
|
||||
// FE button "← Trả lại" trong PeWorkflowPanel gửi `decision: 1` (Approve) thay
|
||||
// vì `2` (Reject) khi target = TraLai (98). Root: `isReject` local variable
|
||||
// trong FE thiếu nhánh TraLai → payload mismatch giữa button label hiển thị
|
||||
// "Trả lại" và decision gửi BE.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Hiệu ứng cũ trước fix: BE TransitionAsync nhận decision=Approve → skip Reject
|
||||
// branch (L51) → enter APPROVE STEP branch (L97) → ApproveV2Async UPSERT
|
||||
// opinion đánh dấu "đã duyệt" cho NV đang nhấn nút → tiến qua Cấp tiếp theo.
|
||||
// User UAT thấy: "Trả về nhưng hệ thống vẫn duyệt".
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Fix BE defense-in-depth: guard early throw ConflictException khi targetPhase
|
||||
// ∈ {TraLai, TuChoi} mà decision != Reject — chặn FE inconsistency tại
|
||||
// boundary BE thay vì depend FE đúng.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// FE fix song song trong fe-admin + fe-user PeWorkflowPanel.tsx (rule §3.9
|
||||
// mirror 2 app) — sync `isReject` + dialog `isSendBack` include TraLai.
|
||||
public class PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowServiceGuardTests
|
||||
{
|
||||
private static (PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService svc, IdentityFixture fix, TestApplicationDbContext db)
|
||||
CreateService()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var fix = new IdentityFixture();
|
||||
var db = fix.Services.GetRequiredService<TestApplicationDbContext>();
|
||||
var um = fix.Services.GetRequiredService<UserManager<User>>();
|
||||
var dt = new FixedDateTime(new DateTime(2026, 5, 12, 0, 0, 0, DateTimeKind.Utc));
|
||||
var notify = new NoOpNotificationService();
|
||||
var svc = new PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService(db, dt, notify, um);
|
||||
return (svc, fix, db);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static PurchaseEvaluation BuildPeInChoDuyet(string code = "PE-GUARD-001")
|
||||
{
|
||||
return new PurchaseEvaluation
|
||||
{
|
||||
Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
|
||||
Type = PurchaseEvaluationType.DuyetNcc,
|
||||
Phase = PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoDuyet,
|
||||
MaPhieu = code,
|
||||
TenGoiThau = "Test guard bug Trả lại",
|
||||
ProjectId = Guid.NewGuid(),
|
||||
DrafterUserId = Guid.NewGuid(),
|
||||
CurrentApprovalLevelOrder = 1,
|
||||
CurrentWorkflowStepIndex = 0,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Arrange: phiếu PE ở ChoDuyet (typical intermediate state khi approver duyệt)
|
||||
var (svc, fix, db) = CreateService();
|
||||
using (fix)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var pe = BuildPeInChoDuyet();
|
||||
db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
|
||||
await db.SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken.None);
|
||||
|
||||
// Act: simulate FE bug payload — button "← Trả lại" gửi decision=Approve
|
||||
// thay vì Reject (gotcha #45 root cause).
|
||||
var act = async () => await svc.TransitionAsync(
|
||||
evaluation: pe,
|
||||
targetPhase: PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai,
|
||||
actorUserId: Guid.NewGuid(),
|
||||
actorRoles: new[] { AppRoles.CostControl },
|
||||
decision: ApprovalDecision.Approve,
|
||||
comment: "test guard mismatch",
|
||||
ct: CancellationToken.None);
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert: BE chặn payload mismatch sớm + state phiếu KHÔNG đổi
|
||||
await act.Should().ThrowAsync<ConflictException>()
|
||||
.WithMessage("*TraLai*Reject*");
|
||||
|
||||
pe.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoDuyet,
|
||||
"Guard chặn trước khi mutate phase");
|
||||
pe.CurrentApprovalLevelOrder.Should().Be(1,
|
||||
"Guard chặn trước khi advance level pointer");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task TransitionAsync_TargetTuChoi_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Tương tự TraLai — TuChoi cũng BẮT BUỘC decision=Reject. Defense
|
||||
// double-cover invariant (FE chỉ bug TraLai branch nhưng guard nên cover
|
||||
// luôn TuChoi cho consistency).
|
||||
var (svc, fix, db) = CreateService();
|
||||
using (fix)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var pe = BuildPeInChoDuyet("PE-GUARD-002");
|
||||
db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
|
||||
await db.SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken.None);
|
||||
|
||||
var act = async () => await svc.TransitionAsync(
|
||||
evaluation: pe,
|
||||
targetPhase: PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TuChoi,
|
||||
actorUserId: Guid.NewGuid(),
|
||||
actorRoles: new[] { AppRoles.CostControl },
|
||||
decision: ApprovalDecision.Approve,
|
||||
comment: "test guard tu choi",
|
||||
ct: CancellationToken.None);
|
||||
|
||||
await act.Should().ThrowAsync<ConflictException>()
|
||||
.WithMessage("*TuChoi*Reject*");
|
||||
|
||||
pe.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoDuyet);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithRejectDecision_SetsPhaseTraLai()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Happy path control test: decision=Reject + target=TraLai → BE đi vào
|
||||
// Reject branch (L51), set Phase=TraLai, clear pointer. Verify fix
|
||||
// KHÔNG break flow Trả lại đúng.
|
||||
var (svc, fix, db) = CreateService();
|
||||
using (fix)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var pe = BuildPeInChoDuyet("PE-GUARD-003");
|
||||
db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
|
||||
await db.SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken.None);
|
||||
|
||||
await svc.TransitionAsync(
|
||||
evaluation: pe,
|
||||
targetPhase: PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai,
|
||||
actorUserId: Guid.NewGuid(),
|
||||
actorRoles: new[] { AppRoles.CostControl },
|
||||
decision: ApprovalDecision.Reject,
|
||||
comment: "trả lại sửa lại đi",
|
||||
ct: CancellationToken.None);
|
||||
|
||||
pe.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai,
|
||||
"Reject branch set Phase=TraLai");
|
||||
pe.CurrentApprovalLevelOrder.Should().BeNull("Trả lại clear level pointer");
|
||||
pe.CurrentWorkflowStepIndex.Should().BeNull("Trả lại clear step pointer");
|
||||
pe.SlaDeadline.Should().BeNull("Trả lại clear SLA");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Stub: not assert side effects of notify (out-of-scope cho guard test).
|
||||
// Pattern reuse cho future PE service tests.
|
||||
internal sealed class NoOpNotificationService : INotificationService
|
||||
{
|
||||
public Task NotifyAsync(
|
||||
Guid userId,
|
||||
NotificationType type,
|
||||
string title,
|
||||
string? description = null,
|
||||
string? href = null,
|
||||
Guid? refId = null,
|
||||
CancellationToken ct = default) => Task.CompletedTask;
|
||||
|
||||
public Task NotifyManyAsync(
|
||||
IEnumerable<Guid> userIds,
|
||||
NotificationType type,
|
||||
string title,
|
||||
string? description = null,
|
||||
string? href = null,
|
||||
Guid? refId = null,
|
||||
CancellationToken ct = default) => Task.CompletedTask;
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user