[CLAUDE] PurchaseEvaluation: Chunk A — BE guard target TraLai/TuChoi BẮT BUỘC decision=Reject + 3 regression test

Defense-in-depth chặn FE inconsistency (gotcha #45 — Session 21 turn 3).
Bug pattern: button "← Trả lại" trong PeWorkflowPanel.tsx gửi decision=Approve
khi target=TraLai do `isReject` local var thiếu nhánh TraLai → BE skip Reject
branch → enter APPROVE STEP → ApproveV2Async UPSERT opinion = "đã duyệt" +
advance Cấp. User UAT thấy: "Trả về nhưng hệ thống vẫn duyệt".

BE guard:
- Service `TransitionAsync` thêm early check sau set isAdmin/isSystem
- targetPhase ∈ {TraLai, TuChoi} && decision != Reject → throw ConflictException
- Boundary protection cho mọi caller tương lai (API client / mobile / cron)

Tests (Infra suite +3):
- TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState
- TransitionAsync_TargetTuChoi_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState
- TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithRejectDecision_SetsPhaseTraLai (happy path)
+ NoOpNotificationService stub reusable cho future PE service tests

Verify:
- dotnet test SolutionErp.slnx → 84 PASS (58 Domain + 26 Infra = +3 from 81 baseline)
- Build pass (0 err, 2 warn CS8602 pre-existing DocxRenderer)

Pending Chunk B: FE fix PeWorkflowPanel.tsx isReject + dialog isSendBack
mirror 2 app (fe-admin + fe-user) — sync với BE guard rule.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
pqhuy1987
2026-05-13 09:41:14 +07:00
parent 0a3b747612
commit de0088742f
2 changed files with 196 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using SolutionErp.Application.Common.Exceptions;
using SolutionErp.Application.Notifications;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Common;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Contracts; // ApprovalDecision enum (shared HĐ/PE)
using SolutionErp.Domain.Identity;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Notifications;
using SolutionErp.Domain.PurchaseEvaluations;
using SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Services;
using SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests.Common;
namespace SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests.Services;
// Regression test for Session 21 turn 3 bug — gotcha #45:
// FE button "← Trả lại" trong PeWorkflowPanel gửi `decision: 1` (Approve) thay
// vì `2` (Reject) khi target = TraLai (98). Root: `isReject` local variable
// trong FE thiếu nhánh TraLai → payload mismatch giữa button label hiển thị
// "Trả lại" và decision gửi BE.
//
// Hiệu ứng cũ trước fix: BE TransitionAsync nhận decision=Approve → skip Reject
// branch (L51) → enter APPROVE STEP branch (L97) → ApproveV2Async UPSERT
// opinion đánh dấu "đã duyệt" cho NV đang nhấn nút → tiến qua Cấp tiếp theo.
// User UAT thấy: "Trả về nhưng hệ thống vẫn duyệt".
//
// Fix BE defense-in-depth: guard early throw ConflictException khi targetPhase
// ∈ {TraLai, TuChoi} mà decision != Reject — chặn FE inconsistency tại
// boundary BE thay vì depend FE đúng.
//
// FE fix song song trong fe-admin + fe-user PeWorkflowPanel.tsx (rule §3.9
// mirror 2 app) — sync `isReject` + dialog `isSendBack` include TraLai.
public class PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowServiceGuardTests
{
private static (PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService svc, IdentityFixture fix, TestApplicationDbContext db)
CreateService()
{
var fix = new IdentityFixture();
var db = fix.Services.GetRequiredService<TestApplicationDbContext>();
var um = fix.Services.GetRequiredService<UserManager<User>>();
var dt = new FixedDateTime(new DateTime(2026, 5, 12, 0, 0, 0, DateTimeKind.Utc));
var notify = new NoOpNotificationService();
var svc = new PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService(db, dt, notify, um);
return (svc, fix, db);
}
private static PurchaseEvaluation BuildPeInChoDuyet(string code = "PE-GUARD-001")
{
return new PurchaseEvaluation
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
Type = PurchaseEvaluationType.DuyetNcc,
Phase = PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoDuyet,
MaPhieu = code,
TenGoiThau = "Test guard bug Trả lại",
ProjectId = Guid.NewGuid(),
DrafterUserId = Guid.NewGuid(),
CurrentApprovalLevelOrder = 1,
CurrentWorkflowStepIndex = 0,
};
}
[Fact]
public async Task TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState()
{
// Arrange: phiếu PE ở ChoDuyet (typical intermediate state khi approver duyệt)
var (svc, fix, db) = CreateService();
using (fix)
{
var pe = BuildPeInChoDuyet();
db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
await db.SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken.None);
// Act: simulate FE bug payload — button "← Trả lại" gửi decision=Approve
// thay vì Reject (gotcha #45 root cause).
var act = async () => await svc.TransitionAsync(
evaluation: pe,
targetPhase: PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai,
actorUserId: Guid.NewGuid(),
actorRoles: new[] { AppRoles.CostControl },
decision: ApprovalDecision.Approve,
comment: "test guard mismatch",
ct: CancellationToken.None);
// Assert: BE chặn payload mismatch sớm + state phiếu KHÔNG đổi
await act.Should().ThrowAsync<ConflictException>()
.WithMessage("*TraLai*Reject*");
pe.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoDuyet,
"Guard chặn trước khi mutate phase");
pe.CurrentApprovalLevelOrder.Should().Be(1,
"Guard chặn trước khi advance level pointer");
}
}
[Fact]
public async Task TransitionAsync_TargetTuChoi_WithApproveDecision_Throws_AndDoesNotMutateState()
{
// Tương tự TraLai — TuChoi cũng BẮT BUỘC decision=Reject. Defense
// double-cover invariant (FE chỉ bug TraLai branch nhưng guard nên cover
// luôn TuChoi cho consistency).
var (svc, fix, db) = CreateService();
using (fix)
{
var pe = BuildPeInChoDuyet("PE-GUARD-002");
db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
await db.SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken.None);
var act = async () => await svc.TransitionAsync(
evaluation: pe,
targetPhase: PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TuChoi,
actorUserId: Guid.NewGuid(),
actorRoles: new[] { AppRoles.CostControl },
decision: ApprovalDecision.Approve,
comment: "test guard tu choi",
ct: CancellationToken.None);
await act.Should().ThrowAsync<ConflictException>()
.WithMessage("*TuChoi*Reject*");
pe.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoDuyet);
}
}
[Fact]
public async Task TransitionAsync_TargetTraLai_WithRejectDecision_SetsPhaseTraLai()
{
// Happy path control test: decision=Reject + target=TraLai → BE đi vào
// Reject branch (L51), set Phase=TraLai, clear pointer. Verify fix
// KHÔNG break flow Trả lại đúng.
var (svc, fix, db) = CreateService();
using (fix)
{
var pe = BuildPeInChoDuyet("PE-GUARD-003");
db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
await db.SaveChangesAsync(CancellationToken.None);
await svc.TransitionAsync(
evaluation: pe,
targetPhase: PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai,
actorUserId: Guid.NewGuid(),
actorRoles: new[] { AppRoles.CostControl },
decision: ApprovalDecision.Reject,
comment: "trả lại sửa lại đi",
ct: CancellationToken.None);
pe.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TraLai,
"Reject branch set Phase=TraLai");
pe.CurrentApprovalLevelOrder.Should().BeNull("Trả lại clear level pointer");
pe.CurrentWorkflowStepIndex.Should().BeNull("Trả lại clear step pointer");
pe.SlaDeadline.Should().BeNull("Trả lại clear SLA");
}
}
}
// Stub: not assert side effects of notify (out-of-scope cho guard test).
// Pattern reuse cho future PE service tests.
internal sealed class NoOpNotificationService : INotificationService
{
public Task NotifyAsync(
Guid userId,
NotificationType type,
string title,
string? description = null,
string? href = null,
Guid? refId = null,
CancellationToken ct = default) => Task.CompletedTask;
public Task NotifyManyAsync(
IEnumerable<Guid> userIds,
NotificationType type,
string title,
string? description = null,
string? href = null,
Guid? refId = null,
CancellationToken ct = default) => Task.CompletedTask;
}