[CLAUDE] Tests: Chunk E6 — 6 test 2-stage approval (PE) + IdentityFixture helper

Đóng "Tests Phase 3 mini cần UserManager DI helper" defer từ session 8.

IdentityFixture (Common/IdentityFixture.cs):
- Setup ServiceProvider với Identity stack đầy đủ:
  - DbContext SQLite shared connection
  - AddIdentityCore<User> + AddRoles<Role> + AddEntityFrameworkStores
- Single shared scope cho fixture lifetime → DbContext + UserManager đồng instance
- Helper CreateUserAsync(email, name, deptId, roles, canBypassReview)
- Note: dùng Role custom (không phải IdentityRole<Guid>) để match
  ApplicationDbContext : IdentityDbContext<User, Role, Guid>

6 test PE 2-stage logic (Services/PeTwoStageApprovalTests.cs):
- NV_Review_Blocks_Phase_Transition (đóng bug anh Kiệt — chính xác)
- TPB_Confirm_After_NV_Review_Allows_Transition (happy path 2-stage)
- NV_With_BypassReview_Allows_Transition_With_IsBypassed_True (bypass NV)
- Admin_Skips_TwoStage_Logic_Entirely (admin bypass)
- Reject_Sets_RejectedFromPhase_And_Forces_DangSoanThao (smart reject)
- Resume_After_Reject_Jumps_Back_To_RejectedPhase (jump-back logic)

Stub FakeNotificationService — best effort path không cần verify.

Note: tests cho Contract + Budget 2-stage skip — logic identical PE, ROI thấp.
Pattern PeTwoStageApprovalTests reusable nếu cần test riêng tương lai.

Total: 54 Domain + 29 Infra (17 codegen + 6 PE WF Application + 6 PE 2-stage)
= **83 test pass** (+6 mới).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
pqhuy1987
2026-05-04 13:52:43 +07:00
parent 1fc439b978
commit 8353fe87c0
2 changed files with 370 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Identity;
using Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using SolutionErp.Application.Notifications;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Common;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Contracts;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Identity;
using SolutionErp.Domain.Notifications;
using SolutionErp.Domain.PurchaseEvaluations;
using SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Services;
using SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests.Common;
namespace SolutionErp.Infrastructure.Tests.Services;
// Tests cho 2-stage department approval logic ở PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService.
// Cover bug fix anh Kiệt: NV.PRO duyệt phase ChoPurchasing → BLOCK transition.
// TPB.PRO confirm → ALLOW transition.
//
// Pattern: dùng IdentityFixture (Identity stack + DbContext SQLite) để
// test thật end-to-end service thay vì mock.
public class PeTwoStageApprovalTests : IClassFixture<IdentityFixture>
{
private readonly IdentityFixture _fx;
private readonly TestApplicationDbContext _db;
private readonly UserManager<User> _userManager;
private readonly PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService _service;
private readonly Guid _deptPro;
private readonly Guid _deptCcm;
public PeTwoStageApprovalTests(IdentityFixture fx)
{
_fx = fx;
_db = fx.Services.GetRequiredService<TestApplicationDbContext>();
_userManager = fx.Services.GetRequiredService<UserManager<User>>();
// Seed 2 departments (idempotent — check trước khi insert vì fixture
// shared across tests trong class).
_deptPro = SeedDept("PRO", "Phòng Cung ứng");
_deptCcm = SeedDept("CCM", "Phòng Kiểm soát chi phí");
var clock = new FixedDateTime(new DateTime(2026, 5, 4, 10, 0, 0, DateTimeKind.Utc));
var fakeNotifications = new FakeNotificationService();
_service = new PurchaseEvaluationWorkflowService(
_db,
clock,
fakeNotifications,
_userManager);
}
private Guid SeedDept(string code, string name)
{
var existing = _db.Departments.FirstOrDefault(d => d.Code == code);
if (existing is not null) return existing.Id;
var d = new SolutionErp.Domain.Master.Department { Id = Guid.NewGuid(), Code = code, Name = name };
_db.Departments.Add(d);
_db.SaveChanges();
return d.Id;
}
private async Task<PurchaseEvaluation> SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase phase, Guid? projectId = null)
{
// Project required by FK constraint.
var pid = projectId ?? Guid.NewGuid();
if (!_db.Projects.Any(p => p.Id == pid))
{
_db.Projects.Add(new SolutionErp.Domain.Master.Project
{
Id = pid,
Code = $"PRJ-{Random.Shared.Next(10000):D4}",
Name = "Test project",
});
}
var pe = new PurchaseEvaluation
{
Id = Guid.NewGuid(),
Type = PurchaseEvaluationType.DuyetNcc,
Phase = phase,
TenGoiThau = "Test gói thầu",
ProjectId = pid,
};
_db.PurchaseEvaluations.Add(pe);
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
return pe;
}
[Fact]
public async Task NV_Review_Blocks_Phase_Transition()
{
// Arrange: NV.PRO (role Procurement, dept PRO, NOT DeptManager).
var nv = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"nv-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "NV PRO", _deptPro, ["Procurement"]);
var pe = await SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoPurchasing);
// Act: NV approve to ChoCCM.
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM, nv.Id, ["Procurement"],
ApprovalDecision.Approve, "review");
// Assert: phase KHÔNG đổi, có 1 row Stage=Review.
var fresh = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.AsNoTracking().FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
fresh.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoPurchasing);
var deptApprovals = await _db.PurchaseEvaluationDepartmentApprovals
.Where(a => a.PurchaseEvaluationId == pe.Id).ToListAsync();
deptApprovals.Should().HaveCount(1);
deptApprovals[0].Stage.Should().Be(ApprovalStage.Review);
deptApprovals[0].DepartmentId.Should().Be(_deptPro);
deptApprovals[0].IsBypassed.Should().BeFalse();
var approvals = await _db.PurchaseEvaluationApprovals
.Where(a => a.PurchaseEvaluationId == pe.Id).ToListAsync();
approvals.Should().HaveCount(1);
approvals[0].Comment.Should().StartWith("[Review NV]");
}
[Fact]
public async Task TPB_Confirm_After_NV_Review_Allows_Transition()
{
// Arrange: NV review trước, sau đó TPB confirm.
var nv = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"nv-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "NV PRO", _deptPro, ["Procurement"]);
var tpb = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"tpb-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "TPB PRO", _deptPro, ["DeptManager", "Procurement"]);
var pe = await SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoPurchasing);
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM, nv.Id, ["Procurement"],
ApprovalDecision.Approve, "review NV");
// Re-fetch tracked entity (service modifies state ở Phase prior).
pe = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
// Act: TPB confirm.
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM, tpb.Id, ["DeptManager", "Procurement"],
ApprovalDecision.Approve, "confirm TPB");
// Assert: phase đổi, có 2 row (Review + Confirm).
var fresh = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.AsNoTracking().FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
fresh.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM);
var deptApprovals = await _db.PurchaseEvaluationDepartmentApprovals
.Where(a => a.PurchaseEvaluationId == pe.Id).ToListAsync();
deptApprovals.Should().HaveCount(2);
deptApprovals.Should().Contain(a => a.Stage == ApprovalStage.Review && a.ApproverUserId == nv.Id);
deptApprovals.Should().Contain(a => a.Stage == ApprovalStage.Confirm && a.ApproverUserId == tpb.Id && !a.IsBypassed);
}
[Fact]
public async Task NV_With_BypassReview_Allows_Transition_With_IsBypassed_True()
{
// Arrange: NV CanBypassReview=true.
var nv = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"nv-bypass-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "NV PRO bypass",
_deptPro, ["Procurement"], canBypassReview: true);
var pe = await SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoPurchasing);
// Act: bypass user approve → đẩy thẳng Stage=Confirm.
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM, nv.Id, ["Procurement"],
ApprovalDecision.Approve, "bypass approve");
// Assert: phase đổi, có 1 row Stage=Confirm + IsBypassed=true.
var fresh = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.AsNoTracking().FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
fresh.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM);
var deptApprovals = await _db.PurchaseEvaluationDepartmentApprovals
.Where(a => a.PurchaseEvaluationId == pe.Id).ToListAsync();
deptApprovals.Should().HaveCount(1);
deptApprovals[0].Stage.Should().Be(ApprovalStage.Confirm);
deptApprovals[0].IsBypassed.Should().BeTrue();
deptApprovals[0].ApproverRoleSnapshot.Should().Be("NV(bypass)");
}
[Fact]
public async Task Admin_Skips_TwoStage_Logic_Entirely()
{
// Arrange: Admin role.
var admin = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"admin-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "Admin user", null, ["Admin"]);
var pe = await SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoPurchasing);
// Act: Admin approve.
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM, admin.Id, ["Admin"],
ApprovalDecision.Approve, "admin force");
// Assert: phase đổi, KHÔNG có DepartmentApproval row.
var fresh = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.AsNoTracking().FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
fresh.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM);
var deptApprovals = await _db.PurchaseEvaluationDepartmentApprovals
.Where(a => a.PurchaseEvaluationId == pe.Id).ToListAsync();
deptApprovals.Should().BeEmpty();
}
[Fact]
public async Task Reject_Sets_RejectedFromPhase_And_Forces_DangSoanThao()
{
// Arrange: PE phase=ChoCCM. Drafter reject.
var actor = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"ccm-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "CCM TPB", _deptCcm, ["DeptManager", "CostControl"]);
var pe = await SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM);
// Act: reject (target irrelevant — service forces về DangSoanThao).
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.TuChoi, actor.Id, ["DeptManager", "CostControl"],
ApprovalDecision.Reject, "không phù hợp");
// Assert.
var fresh = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.AsNoTracking().FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
fresh.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.DangSoanThao);
fresh.RejectedFromPhase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM);
}
[Fact]
public async Task Resume_After_Reject_Jumps_Back_To_RejectedPhase()
{
// Arrange: PE rejected từ ChoCCM, đang ở DangSoanThao + RejectedFromPhase=ChoCCM.
var drafter = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"drafter-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "Drafter", _deptPro, ["Drafter"]);
var pe = await SeedPeAsync(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.DangSoanThao);
pe.RejectedFromPhase = PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM;
await _db.SaveChangesAsync();
// Act: drafter trình lại từ DangSoanThao → ChoPurchasing (target không
// quan trọng vì resume sẽ override = RejectedFromPhase). Note: service
// jump tới ChoCCM, nhưng nếu actor có dept thì sẽ hit 2-stage logic.
// Simpler: dùng admin để bypass 2-stage gate khi resume cũng OK.
var admin = await _fx.CreateUserAsync(
$"admin-resume-{Guid.NewGuid():N}@test", "Admin resume", null, ["Admin"]);
await _service.TransitionAsync(
pe, PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoPurchasing, admin.Id, ["Admin"],
ApprovalDecision.Approve, "drafter resume");
// Assert: phase jump tới ChoCCM (không phải ChoPurchasing target),
// RejectedFromPhase=null.
var fresh = await _db.PurchaseEvaluations.AsNoTracking().FirstAsync(x => x.Id == pe.Id);
fresh.Phase.Should().Be(PurchaseEvaluationPhase.ChoCCM);
fresh.RejectedFromPhase.Should().BeNull();
}
}
// Stub notification service — tests không cần verify notification path
// (best effort try/catch ở service đã cover fail case).
internal class FakeNotificationService : INotificationService
{
public Task NotifyAsync(Guid userId, NotificationType type, string title,
string? description = null, string? href = null, Guid? refId = null,
CancellationToken ct = default) => Task.CompletedTask;
public Task NotifyManyAsync(IEnumerable<Guid> userIds, NotificationType type,
string title, string? description = null, string? href = null,
Guid? refId = null, CancellationToken ct = default) => Task.CompletedTask;
}