[CLAUDE] Docs: S124 adap-wave AI_INFRA + owner worker-tier-pin (14 agent opus+effort:max) + user-memory relocate R6 + H24 dogfood
All checks were successful
Deploy SOLUTION_ERP / build-deploy (push) Successful in 5m26s
All checks were successful
Deploy SOLUTION_ERP / build-deploy (push) Successful in 5m26s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
pqhuy1987
@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
# SYNTHESIS — fable-clone reviewer @MAX ensemble (S124 adap-wave-reply)
|
||||
|
||||
- **run:** wf_184f32e2-9da · 3 lane reviewer @opus @max · 975s · 577K tok.
|
||||
- **returns:** L1 PASS_WITH_FIXES (struct) · L2 PASS_WITH_FIXES (struct) · **L3 return GARBLED (#53 empty StructuredOutput) → RECOVERED from `sub-reviewer-3.md` disk (10.7KB)** — garble-resilience (S123 ghi-đĩa-trong-lúc-làm) VALIDATED again.
|
||||
- **em-main P3/P4:** refute + synthesize below.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verdict tổng: PASS_WITH_FIXES (0 over-reach / SCOPE 100% correct · 4 framing-overclaim FIX pre-ship)
|
||||
|
||||
🔴 **Meta-finding (3 lane hội-tụ):** SCOPE/AUTHORITY = **0 over-reach** — mọi item owner-authority (frontmatter model-tier · cadence-counter · budget-số · settings.json) LEAD ĐÃ gate đúng + surface-to-owner. NHƯNG **outward FRAMING = 4 overclaim CÙNG HỌ:** claim SE "ahead/verified" khi thật SE n=0/deferred/looser. **= tái-phát `feedback_meta_count_selfcoverage_blindspot` (S119) NGAY trong plan CITES S119.** Chỉ ensemble bắt được — chứng lại S123 "bài-học trong context KHÔNG tự bật; chỉ reviewer/luật soi-được mới chặn".
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings ACCEPT (7) + disposition
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Lane | Sev | Finding | Disposition |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| F1 | L1+L2+L3 | **M** (L2) | **push-guard "REFINEMENT ahead-of-broadcast" = OVERCLAIM.** SE đếm TRAILING (looser than broadcast "mọi wal:=0"), cố-ý GIỮ sandwiched `wal:` (`session-end §5.0:178`) = nguồn "57 lọt origin/main" S119. KHÔNG chiều nào "ahead". Mâu-thuẫn chính run.md:15 + mark cl.4. | ✅ ACCEPT. Relabel "**diverge-LOOSER, owner-accepted sandwiched-leak trade-off**". adap-report hub PHẢI disclose divergence + cite mark `…15-32-20` cl.4 + 57-wal S119. **KHÔNG bán "refinement".** |
|
||||
| F2 | L1+L3 | **M** (L3) | **do-token STATUS 26075 = SAI 2.72×.** Real whole-file = **70892 tok** (em tự verify: truncation `70892 tokens, cap 25000, cannot paginate`). 26075 = folded-CHUNK count (vi-phạm do-token §5 "Read TRỌN no offset/limit"). = do-token failure-mode NGAY khi adopt do-token. | ✅ ACCEPT + em VERIFIED. STATUS **70892** (18.7% of 380K) · HANDOFF **32254** (L3-measured, ~OK vs folded 32988). Surface số ĐÚNG cho owner-decision #3. |
|
||||
| F3 | L1 | **M** | **bon-vong "SE có thể AHEAD hub" = overclaim.** SE loop-1/2 vai (tooling-auditor H1 · lead-view/omission H24) **n=0 CHƯA CHẠY** (`.session-counter last_audit=0` + mark caveat). Hub loop-3 n=1. Claim AHEAD = INVERT evidence. | ✅ ACCEPT. Down: "**vai DEFINED nhưng n=0 = designed-not-proven, cùng mốc-0 như hub**". Giữ reflection humble (harvest-curator KHÔNG soi tooling-auditor = kẽ giống hub). |
|
||||
| F4 | L3 | **M** | **meta-count: "6 adap-request R1-R6" nhưng list chỉ 5** (R1,R2,R3,R4,r6,§8) — **R5 DROPPED.** R5 = RETIRE-LEGACY + citation-trap + Goodhart = "phần hub thấy giá-trị nhất cả wave" (reply §6), hub honest-defer no-commit. = S119 blind-spot: count-6/list-5, bỏ đúng contribution CAO NHẤT của SE (mark `…17-23-10`). | ✅ ACCEPT. Thêm R5: SE-side `executed S123 (mark …17-23-10)` · hub-side `input-received, honest-defer, NO-commit` (KHÔNG imply hub accepted/verified). |
|
||||
| F5 | L3 | **M** | **h17 nấc "verified" overclaim.** cadence chưa chạy vòng nào → KHÔNG thể "verified". Mark caveat + `_owner_ratified` "nobody may sell proven-effective". Hub format §6.1 = "đã đọc, không đổi" = `agreed`. | ✅ ACCEPT. nấc → **`agreed / đã-đọc-không-đổi (config single-source)`** + caveat "cadence chưa chạy; 6/15/3 owner-chosen-unproven; re-tune after cycle-2; hub 'đừng chép'". |
|
||||
| F6 | L1+L3 | m | **E-2 (EOL) nấc "verified" drops single-probe caveat.** SE falsify = 1 probe thiếu control-group (erratum-2:32 + reply:17); STATUS:6 L3 tự ghi "CRLF đơn-độc CÓ THỂ đủ giết ⇒ hạ nấc". | ✅ ACCEPT. nấc = "credit + 0-change" NHƯNG caveat "single-probe falsification (agent CRLF-toàn survived); full mechanism CHƯA verified; SE tự flag LF-only path chưa-verify (STATUS L3); control-group recommended". |
|
||||
| F7 | L1 | m | **C h17 "phiên DÀI → keep counter" = lý-do YẾU** (phiên-dài THỰC RA giống nền-gỡ của hub one-session/day). | ✅ ACCEPT partial. Kết-luận (keep) ĐÚNG nhưng đổi lý-do: **§6.4 default-valid + vai n=0 (chưa data để bỏ) + owner-cost-decision**, KHÔNG dựa "phiên dài". |
|
||||
|
||||
## Refute / KHÔNG đổi (em-main P4)
|
||||
- L2-m2 "trailing-K = nguồn 57 chỉ PARTIAL causal" (57 mostly historical accumulation) — ACCEPT nuance: adap-report ghi "trailing-K = kênh sandwiched CONTINUE leak, KHÔNG phải tạo cả 57".
|
||||
- 3 lane đều KHÔNG bắt misread NỘI-DUNG broadcast (L2: "5/6 read-faithful, 0 clean misread"). Scope-narrow của h17 (chỉ cadence, giữ 4 sàn) + erratum E-1 (chỉ MODEL vế) + do-token/bon-vong NOT-adopt = LEAD đọc ĐÚNG. → classification A-F về BẢN-CHẤT đúng, chỉ FRAMING/nấc sai.
|
||||
|
||||
## do-token real measurement (in-frame observation — số ĐÚNG cho owner)
|
||||
| file | byte | real-token (harness truncation, verified S124) | % of 380K lead budget | paginate? |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| STATUS.md | 124,503 | **70,892** | 18.7% | ❌ cannot (1 mega-line 69,870 char) |
|
||||
| HANDOFF.md | 60,628 | **32,254** | 8.5% | ❌ cannot |
|
||||
| **2-file total** | | **103,146** | **27.1%** | — |
|
||||
|
||||
🔴 2 mega-file always-on = 27% budget lead, KHÔNG Read-paginate được → `[carry:retier-megaline]` **materially more urgent** than byte/4 ước (byte/4 STATUS = 31K, thật 70.9K = **2.29× dưới**). ĐỔI budget-số / re-tier = **owner-gated** → surface, KHÔNG tự làm.
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
|
||||
# RUN — S124 adap wave reply + 4 broadcast (fable-clone reviewer @MAX)
|
||||
|
||||
- **run-id:** 2026-07-15-S124-adap-wave-reply
|
||||
- **engine:** `/fable-clone reviewer` @MAX (owner-invoked S124) — ENSEMBLE tier-2, 3 lane reviewer @`model:opus` @`effort:max`, RETURN-small + disk-write (garble-resilient S123 lesson).
|
||||
- **lead:** Opus 4.8 owner-choice (H23-precedence DEFER — lead=Opus không phân-biệt spawn-param⟂frontmatter).
|
||||
- **spec:** `spec-adap-wave-reply-15-07-2026.md` (bản plan reviewer refute).
|
||||
- **HMW-mode:** ON.
|
||||
|
||||
## Đề-bài
|
||||
Adap 1 directed reply (`reply-wave-s122`, pulled+verified STAGE-1) + 4 broadcast mới `outbox/all` (erratum-h8 · h17-cadence-bookend · do-token · bon-vong) + reconcile push-guard/presence. Reviewer rà bản PHÂN-LOẠI in-frame ⟂ owner-gated.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ground-truth đã verify (lead, trước review)
|
||||
- STAGE-1 hash: whole-file + body `7fca0deb…` MATCH.
|
||||
- push-guard vế N: SE ĐÃ adopt `session-end §5.0/§5.2` (TRAILING-K, ca(2) no-deadlock) — grep-verified.
|
||||
- 🔴 **Nuance lead tự-bắt:** TRAILING-K refinement = **nguồn của "57 wal: lọt origin/main" S119** (sandwiched-keep §5.0:178) = **trade-off owner-accepted** (no-rewrite > zero-leak, owner-4 "KHÔNG dọn 57"), KHÔNG phải thuần "ahead-of-broadcast". Reviewer L2 kiểm framing này.
|
||||
- agent frontmatter toàn roster = `model: inherit` (all-inherit H8) — erratum-h8 E-1 nói floor = worker-tier-pin.
|
||||
- `h24_cadence` = 6/15/3 trong `memory-budget.json` (config, detector đọc key) — h17-bookend supersede scheduler.
|
||||
|
||||
## taskList snapshot
|
||||
| # | lane | role | tier | effort | lens | disk |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1 | L1-scope | reviewer | opus | max | in-frame ⟂ owner-gated authority | sub-reviewer-1.md |
|
||||
| 2 | L2-fidelity | reviewer | opus | max | đọc-đúng-source? already-done? TRAILING-framing? | sub-reviewer-2.md |
|
||||
| 3 | L3-honest | reviewer | opus | max | nấc G-011 / overclaim / do-token real-N logic | sub-reviewer-3.md |
|
||||
|
||||
## Synthesis — ✅ DONE
|
||||
→ `review-synthesis.md`. Verdict PASS_WITH_FIXES: SCOPE 0 over-reach · 4 framing-overclaim FIXED pre-ship (push-guard "ahead"→diverge-looser · do-token 26075→**70892** · bon-vong "AHEAD"→n=0 · h17 verified→agreed · +R5-dropped meta-count · E-2 single-probe caveat).
|
||||
- L3 return #53-garbled → recovered from `sub-reviewer-3.md` disk (garble-resilience validated).
|
||||
- 6 adap-report written `docs/governance/adap-reports/` (4 new + 2 reconcile). STAGE-1/2 done. 4 owner-decisions surfaced.
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner-decisions — 🔴 OWNER OVERRODE reviewer "KHÔNG apply" → LEAD APPLIED (S124)
|
||||
Reviewer khuyến "surface KHÔNG apply"; anh chốt 4 quyết-định → em APPLY (uncommitted, cần commit @closeout):
|
||||
1. **E-1 model-tier — APPLIED:** 14/14 frontmatter `model:inherit→opus`+`effort:max` (worker-tier-pin) + hmw.js 7-spot comment sync. 🔴 **restart để ăn runtime.** 🔴 **H23-precedence NAY testable ở lead=Opus** (spawn tier:'fable' → resolved fable-vs-opus) — nếu frontmatter thắng ⇒ `/fable-real` NO-OP (mark H21 AH). **Test phiên kế post-restart.**
|
||||
2. **h17 — APPLIED giữ-counter** (default-valid §6.4 + vai n=0). adap-report ghi `agreed`.
|
||||
3. **do-token — measured, cap GIỮ** (anh chốt): STATUS 70892 / HANDOFF 32254 / 27.1% budget — ghi do-token adap-report. Re-tier mega-line = carry (chưa làm).
|
||||
4. **r6 relocate — APPLIED:** `settings.json autoMemoryDirectory` + copy 50 file → `.claude/auto-memory/` (old backup). 🔴 **UNTRACKED — R6 goal (git-track) CHƯA đạt tới khi COMMIT** (omission-auditor catch). restart+workspace-trust+runtime-verify.
|
||||
|
||||
## H24 dogfood — FIRST-EVER real run (2 vai, 0-garble, cả 2 giá-trị THẬT)
|
||||
- **lead-view-auditor** (`sub-lead-view.md`): 9 flag (8 view-residual-asym + 1 view-stale-count) — bắt trọn doc-sync all-inherit→worker-tier. ĐÃ vá: session-start/fable-clone/README/ultra-on. CLEAN-verified: marks (0 all-inherit, đã annotate) · memory-budget. Corrected lead: marks KHÔNG cần sửa body (P4/P8).
|
||||
- **lead-omission-auditor** (`sub-lead-omission.md`): 4 gap (2 dropped + 2 sunk) + 1 INFORM. Bắt: R6-untracked · /fable-real-NO-OP-no-durable-record · 4-decision-no-record (FIXED bởi block này) · h24-2vai-chua-chay-falsified. gap-owner-specifics=0 (effort:max captured). 🔴 **INFORM escalate:** gap-carry-aged STRUCTURALLY VACUOUS — HANDOFF tiering (2-3 session) cap carry-lines dưới M=6 ⇒ detector KHÔNG BAO GIỜ fire (S121-known, W3-fix chưa giải). → owner: hạ M, hoặc track carry-age ở ledger KHÔNG-tiered.
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔻 CLOSEOUT CHECKLIST (auditors demand — chống re-stamp propagate stale)
|
||||
- [ ] **COMMIT** `.claude/auto-memory/` (R6 goal = tracked; hook KHÔNG cover path này).
|
||||
- [ ] HANDOFF carries UPDATE (KHÔNG blind re-stamp): `usermem-outside-repo`→resolved-relocated-need-commit · `h24-2vai-chua-chay`→RAN-S124-both-clean · `h23-precedence-fable`→now-testable-postrestart-Opus · counter 2→3.
|
||||
- [ ] STATUS §Sub-agents / do-token real-N record + STATUS:6 model-tier "12/12→worker-tier-pin" (mega-line FROZEN-narrative — split per-occurrence, KHÔNG blanket-edit; = re-tier carry territory).
|
||||
- [ ] auto-memory `project_harness4_two_tier_model.md` + MEMORY.md:45 — update superseded H4→H8→S124 (auto-inject stale).
|
||||
- [ ] Remaining doc: HANDOFF:5 all-inherit (verify frozen-brief vs live).
|
||||
- [ ] Hub adap-report email (chờ owner go).
|
||||
- [ ] Update `.session-counter.json last_audit.light_at_counter=3` (audit ran).
|
||||
- [ ] Optional: trim effort:max → heavy-roles-only (owner cost-decision).
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
|
||||
# SPEC — Adap wave S124: reply-wave-s122 + 4 broadcast mới (15-07-2026)
|
||||
|
||||
> Engine-đắt `/fable-clone reviewer` @MAX (owner-invoked S124). Spec do LEAD ghi SAU verify (H21 honest-note c). Worker = reviewer ensemble review CHÍNH bản plan này (propose → **reviewer refute** → lead synthesize → apply).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ① Tính-năng / đề-bài
|
||||
|
||||
Adap 1 email directed (`reply-wave-s122`) + 4 broadcast `outbox/all` mới (sau khi S122 đã đóng wave tới 07-14). **Đề-bài cho reviewer:** rà bản PHÂN-LOẠI dưới đây có ĐÚNG không — đặc-biệt ranh-giới **in-frame (em-main tự làm)** ⟂ **owner-gated (PHẢI hỏi anh)**, theo nguyên-tắc-MỚI owner-6 chốt S119 (*trong-khung=tự làm · vượt-khung=🔴request anh+AI_INFRA · khung-tự-mâu-thuẫn=report→hub*).
|
||||
|
||||
### Nguồn (đã đọc đầy-đủ, byte-verified)
|
||||
- `reply-wave-s122` (8.3KB, directed) — pulled+hash-verified STAGE-1 (whole-file + body `7fca0deb…` MATCH), logged `_index` pending.
|
||||
- `erratum-h8-forward-pointer-and-eol-title` (3.3KB, update)
|
||||
- `h17-cadence-update-bookend` (16KB, update — **supersedes cadence-scheduler của H24**)
|
||||
- `do-token-that-khong-can-api-key` (12KB, new/draft, NOT-adopt)
|
||||
- `bon-vong-tu-bao-tri-hat-nhan-harness` (13KB, new, NOT-adopt)
|
||||
- `adap-update-harness-22-wal-push-guard` (11KB, update, `dd4b0176` = vế N)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ② Cách implement (bản phân-loại LEAD đề-xuất — reviewer refute từng dòng)
|
||||
|
||||
### A. reply-wave-s122 (directed reply — ACK + rulings)
|
||||
Nội-dung chính = **trả lời 6 adap-request R1-R6 của S122** + 2 đính-chính. Không phải broadcast-adopt; là input hiểu-biết feed vào B-F.
|
||||
- **R1** (all-inherit ⟂ hub-pin): SE đọc bản CŨ (H8.1). Lineage: H8.1-all-inherit → H8.6 PIN (07-03) → H8.6d owner-choice (07-11) → H23. Floor: **lead=frontier owner-choice · sub-có-memory=worker-tier gán-cứng · roster+form sister-quyết.** → feed vào **B (erratum-h8 E-1)**.
|
||||
- **R2** (push-guard): hub ship `dd4b0176` (vế N); **vế E = EOL-assert ④c nối SAU**. → feed vào **F (push-guard)**.
|
||||
- **R3** (hook side-ref): ruling §P9 — hook chỉ persist-only 0-content dưới owner-mark; side-ref VƯỢT floor → **owner phải ký riêng**. SE "chờ hub phán là đúng". → **carry `hook-vs-budget-cap`/hook side-ref = owner-gated, ĐÓNG câu hỏi: KHÔNG tự làm.**
|
||||
- **R4/EOL**: thí-nghiệm SE **sound**, "CRLF đơn-độc" chỉ ở TIÊU-ĐỀ nén; hub giữ cơ-chế, phát erratum-title, **credit SE**. → feed vào **B (erratum E-2)**.
|
||||
- **r6** (user-memory outside repo): **ĐỔI ĐƯỢC vị-trí** — `autoMemoryDirectory` trong `settings.json` (**absolute path hoặc `~/`, KHÔNG `./`**), mọi scope. Docs-verified, **CHƯA runtime-test**. → **owner-gated (settings.json + workspace-trust + runtime-verify)**.
|
||||
- **§8**: SE đổi `ls agents/*.md==14` → `VALID_ROLES.length==14` = SE tự-siết chặt hơn broadcast (broadcast H24 0-hit dòng đó); best-practice, noted.
|
||||
- **ACTION (in-frame):** đóng carry `usermem-outside-repo` từ "chờ hub" → "hub đã trả (r6): relocate-able, self-verify" → **surface owner-decision** relocate. STAGE-2 move reply → `inbox/ai_infra/` + `_index` processed.
|
||||
|
||||
### B. erratum-h8 (update — re-verify 2 đính-chính)
|
||||
- **E-1 (MODEL vế H8):** all-inherit (06-16) SUPERSEDED. Floor hiện-hành = lead owner-choice + **sub-có-memory = worker-tier gán-cứng** + roster/form sister-quyết. Chỉ vế MODEL đổi; vế "workflow chạy nhanh nhất" của H8 GIỮ.
|
||||
- 🔴 **Trạng-thái SE:** toàn roster frontmatter = `model: inherit` (all-inherit — H8 mark `RC-…11-07…` §K.D). Erratum nói floor = worker-tier gán-cứng cho sub-có-memory. ⇒ **DELTA THẬT** nhưng **tangled 2 tầng:** (i) đổi frontmatter `inherit`→pin `opus` = **model-tier architecture change** (owner-authority §A1) · (ii) chồng đúng lên **H23-precedence LỖ CHƯA-TEST** (`hmw.js` alias-spawn ⟂ frontmatter-inherit — chưa ai test bên nào thắng; lead=Opus KHÔNG phân-biệt được → **DEFER tới lead=Fable**).
|
||||
- **ACTION:** 🔴 **KHÔNG tự đổi frontmatter.** Surface owner-decision + **giữ nguyên carry `h23-precedence-fable`** (E-1 và H23 = cùng 1 nút: nếu frontmatter thắng thì worker-tier-pin phải qua frontmatter; nếu spawn-param thắng thì qua `tier:`). Ghi adap-report nấc = `agreed, deferred-owner+H23`.
|
||||
- **E-2 (EOL title):** "CRLF đơn-độc đủ giết" chỉ ở tiêu-đề. Cơ-chế đúng = CRLF ∧ unquoted `: `. SE ĐÃ falsify (S119) + **được credit**. → **in-frame:** note SE đã đúng, adap-report `verified` (SE là nguồn falsification). 0 change.
|
||||
|
||||
### C. h17-cadence-bookend (update — SUPERSEDES H24 cadence-scheduler)
|
||||
- Hub GỠ counter khỏi chính mình (1 ngày sau khi dạy), chuyển bookend (rà đầy-đủ 2-đầu mỗi phiên). 7 khoản cũ SAI, 4 sàn KEEP (2 vai soi lead · 2 detector [title-freshness + **carry-age, ngưỡng KHÔNG thuộc counter**] · positive-control · roster-3-việc). caveat (b)(d) keep.
|
||||
- 🔴 **Trạng-thái SE = làm ĐÚNG (§6.1):** SE đặt số 6/15/3 vào `memory-budget.json h24_cadence` (config) + detector đọc key + doc trỏ-canonical KHÔNG chép. ⇒ SE **"đã đọc, không đổi"** phần cơ-chế; chỉ cần biết ví-dụ "6/15/3 ở nguồn = tương-tự-Hub" **nay CŨ** (hub bỏ counter).
|
||||
- 🔴 **§4 giới-hạn 1: "Đừng gỡ theo hub"** trừ khi (i) phiên SE ngắn-và-nhiều + (ii) owner chấp-nhận trả-mọi-lượt. SE phiên DÀI (feature/wave). Hub replacement = n=0. → **default-valid = GIỮ counter.**
|
||||
- **§5 API-key close vĩnh-viễn:** hub KHÔNG dùng Anthropic API key (kinh-phí). "Đừng chờ thứ hub ghi 'chờ khóa'." Mọi token-số hub báo = ước-tính. → SE check có mục nào "chờ khóa" (MFE judge-layer scaffold? — KHÔNG API-key-gated, là cross-session-judge-gated; RAG re-index = VOYAGE key ≠ Anthropic key, AI_INFRA-op). → **in-frame:** note, 0 SE-blocker.
|
||||
- **ACTION (in-frame):** adap-report `verified, không-đổi-cơ-chế` (config-based) + note source-example-old. **Surface owner-decision:** SE có muốn theo hub chuyển bookend không? (default = giữ counter — em ĐỀ-XUẤT giữ vì SE phiên-dài + 2 vai H24 CHƯA chạy lần nào [counter=3, nhịp đầu ~S127-128] ⇒ chưa có dữ-liệu để bỏ). `held_clause` frontmatter = hub-internal (contextual_retrieval) → **SE IGNORE**.
|
||||
|
||||
### D. do-token-that (new/draft, NOT-adopt — METHOD)
|
||||
- Harness in **real-token-N** ở dòng truncation khi Read vượt cap (`N tokens, cap 25000`, N>cap = toàn tệp, free, no-API). **Đo, đừng quy-đổi.** Hub tự-bắt: hằng-số char/4 self-label "empirical" sai 42 phiên (4.05 vượt trần số-học 4.0). Net rẻ = lưu phép-đo-thật cạnh hằng-số + assert bao.
|
||||
- 🔴 **Cực-kỳ liên-quan SE:** `token_governor` TOÀN char/4 + byte/3.0-3.5 (honest_caveat tự ghi). `harness_floor.measured_token_estimate=55K` = ước. Mega-line STATUS/HANDOFF: **em ĐÃ thấy real-N từ chính harness lượt này** — STATUS folded chunk 360-dòng = **26075 tok**, HANDOFF 404-dòng = **32988 tok** (cap 25000).
|
||||
- **ACTION (in-frame — MEASURE + net):** (1) đo real-token-N các mega-file SE (STATUS/HANDOFF full) qua Read-force-truncate → ghi lại số THẬT. (2) audit SE "measured" constant cho bẫy "nhãn đã-đo thay việc-đo": `harness_floor 55K` (khai "byte-measured 19K + est 36K" — nửa est, KHÔNG token-thật), byte/tok 3.0-3.5 range. (3) ĐỀ-XUẤT net "assert constant bao real-measure" nếu owner muốn.
|
||||
- 🔴 **owner-gated:** **ĐỔI số** budget (`tier1_hotfeed`, `harness_floor`, `crystallized_backfill.target`) = quyền anh (`role_boundary_note` + mark `RC-…01-58-01`). Em CHỈ đo + báo %, KHÔNG auto-tune. → **surface: real-token đo được vs budget cap → anh quyết có re-tier/đổi-số không.**
|
||||
|
||||
### E. bon-vong-tu-bao-tri (new, NOT-adopt — spirit + evidence)
|
||||
- 4 vòng tự-bảo-trì (hub-specific, "đừng chép số 4"). Bài học: **redundancy > single-net**; **"im-lặng có chữ-ký"** (whitelist qua mọi kiểm hình-thức nhưng tiền-đề-lý-do sai — test "gỡ hàng → hạng-mục hiện lại", đừng neo test-cơ-chế vào 1 hàng sống); eval-layer là yếu nhất.
|
||||
- 🔴 **SE ĐÃ ALIGNED mạnh:** fault-inject 4-bộ (S122) = "gỡ-hàng→hiện-lại" · Goodhart-rời-tập-đo (S123) · citation-trap (S123) · positive-control-đừng-vá-sớm (S123) · H24 2 vai soi-lead = redundancy-layer. SE loop-map: loop-1=tooling-auditor(H1) · loop-2=lead-view/omission(H24) · loop-3=H17+MFE · loop-4=sleep-recovery.
|
||||
- **ACTION (in-frame — reflection, KHÔNG code-change lớn):** adap-report `n-a-mostly-aligned` + ghi 3 phản-chiếu: (1) SE có KIỂM-role cho loop-1/2 (tooling + lead-view/omission) — **có thể AHEAD hub**; nhưng khai thật: các vai đó CHƯA soi-lẫn-nhau độc-lập (harvest-curator KHÔNG soi tooling-auditor) → **kẽ giống hub**. (2) "sequential-not-parallel cho chuỗi checker" — SE fable-clone = parallel-lane-rồi-synthesize (đúng, vì lane ĐỘC-LẬP + em-main = vai-3 tuần-tự); nhưng nếu có chuỗi measure→propose→check thì phải tuần-tự. (3) whitelist SE = `governance-detectors self-exclusion` (6 path) + AS-table + value_protect — áp test "gỡ-hàng→hiện-lại": **có positive-control chưa?** (S119 positive-control permission-matrix suýt bị giết = đúng ca này).
|
||||
|
||||
### F. push-guard dd4b0176 (update, vế N) + presence-not-age-reinject
|
||||
- **push-guard vế N:** SE **ĐÃ adopt S122** (mark `RC-…15-32-20` §5.2 squash→count→push 1-LƯỢT + fault-inject 10/10). 🔴 **SE REFINEMENT ahead-of-broadcast:** SE đếm **TRAILING** `wal:` (cho phép `wal:` kẹp dưới commit-thường = noise-chấp-nhận) thay "mọi wal:=0" — vì "mọi wal:=0" gây **deadlock** khi hook chen (SE fault-inject ca(2) `base+wal+[CLAUDE]`→K=0→push-được). 3 điểm (a)(b)(c) broadcast: SE có đủ (a) so-số-không-exit-code · (b) first-push ref-check · (c) đúng remote-branch.
|
||||
- **vế E (EOL-assert ④c):** SE ĐÃ adopt qua eol-crlf-notice (adap-report `2026-07-15-eol-crlf…` tồn-tại S122).
|
||||
- **presence-not-age-reinject:** SE adap-report `2026-07-13-presence-not-age-reinject` tồn-tại (S115) — name-mismatch với broadcast id (`adap-update-` prefix).
|
||||
- **ACTION (in-frame — reconcile dedup):** ghi adap-report ĐÚNG broadcast-id cho push-guard (`agreed+executed S122, refinement TRAILING`) + presence (`already-applied S115, name-reconcile`). Đóng kẽ dedup exact-id (S119 lesson: naive-diff false-pending).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ③ Checklist (reviewer ensemble @tier:opus @MAX — deliverable + acceptance ĐO-ĐƯỢC)
|
||||
|
||||
**3 lane reviewer, đa lăng-kính, RETURN-only (em-main single-writer synthesize):**
|
||||
|
||||
| Lane | Lăng-kính | Acceptance ĐO-ĐƯỢC |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **L1 — SCOPE/authority** | Ranh-giới in-frame ⟂ owner-gated ĐÚNG chưa? Có chỗ nào LEAD định tự-đổi thứ thuộc quyền-anh (model-frontmatter · cadence-counter · budget-số · settings.json) không? | Liệt-kê từng item B-F: verdict `in-frame-ĐÚNG` / `owner-gated-SÓT` / `over-reach`. ≥1 over-reach = FAIL. |
|
||||
| **L2 — FIDELITY-source** | Mỗi broadcast đọc ĐÚNG chưa? Bẫy: treat `type:new NOT-adopt` (do-token/bon-vong) thành adopt-order? treat already-done (push-guard/presence) thành new? claim TRAILING-refinement ĐÚNG? | Mỗi item: `read-faithful` / `misread:<chỗ>`. Verify claim "push-guard adopted S122 §5.2" bằng grep session-end. ≥1 misread = FAIL. |
|
||||
| **L3 — HONEST-nấc / overclaim** | Nấc G-011 đúng chưa (executed vs verified-pending vs agreed-deferred)? do-token real-token-N dùng đúng chưa (N>cap logic)? Có overclaim "đã đo" khi chỉ est? Có tự-mâu-thuẫn (meta-count S119-lesson)? | Mỗi adap-report-đề-xuất: nấc-đúng / nấc-sai. Bắt mọi "verified" mà thật là "docs-only/deferred". |
|
||||
|
||||
**Acceptance tổng:** mỗi lane trả **VERDICT header dòng-1** (`PASS` / `PASS_WITH_FIXES nC/nM` / `FAIL`) + finding neo `file:line`/broadcast:line. Em-main **refute** finding trùng/sai + synthesize → apply CHỈ phần in-frame PASS, surface owner-decision.
|
||||
|
||||
**Owner-decision surface (KHÔNG apply, chờ anh):**
|
||||
1. **E-1 model-tier:** all-inherit → worker-tier-pin? (tangled H23-precedence-defer).
|
||||
2. **C h17:** giữ counter (em đề-xuất, default-valid) hay theo hub chuyển bookend?
|
||||
3. **D do-token:** real-token đo được → có re-tier mega-line / đổi budget-số không?
|
||||
4. **r6 relocate:** set `autoMemoryDirectory` absolute-path per-repo (settings.json + workspace-trust + runtime-verify)?
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
|
||||
# sub-lead-omission-auditor — S124 (FIRST real run / dogfood, propose-only)
|
||||
|
||||
- **role:** lead-omission-auditor (H24 §2(1) vai-GAP — soi CÁI BỊ THIẾU)
|
||||
- **cadence key:** `h24_cadence` (light_every read by detector = 6). Counter=3, last_ticked=S124. last_audit.light_at_counter=0 (first audit ever).
|
||||
- **method:** built EXPECTATION set from commitment sources (HANDOFF carries via grep -o mega-line, WAL, ACTIVE-MARKS, owner-decisions S119, spec/run.md S124) BEFORE comparing. Ran ≥1 disk-touch before every gap-* (S121 lesson). READ detector H24-2 output, did NOT recompute streak (trap #2).
|
||||
- **enum used (CLOSED):** gap-carry-dropped · gap-carry-aged · gap-owner-specifics · gap-decision-sunk · gap-underfill. No invented class.
|
||||
|
||||
## VERDICT
|
||||
**TOTAL: 4 gap-flags** + 1 gap-carry-aged mechanism-INFORM.
|
||||
- gap-carry-dropped: **2** (usermem-outside-repo, h24-2vai-chua-chay)
|
||||
- gap-decision-sunk: **2** (fable-escalation-NO-OP, model-tier-supersession-unrecorded)
|
||||
- gap-carry-aged: **0 fired** (all streak=1<M=6) + 1 INFORM (mechanism still vacuous post-W3)
|
||||
- gap-owner-specifics: **0** (specifics preserved in artifacts — honest zero, avoided task-hypothesized FP)
|
||||
- gap-underfill: **0** (N/A)
|
||||
|
||||
## CONTEXT (root enabler of the gaps)
|
||||
S124 reviewer wave (`/fable-clone reviewer` @MAX, 3 lane) produced spec+run.md recommending **"SURFACE 4 owner-decisions, KHÔNG apply"** and explicitly **"🔴 KHÔNG tự đổi frontmatter"** + r6-relocate="owner-gated". Owner then OVERRODE → lead APPLIED (all uncommitted):
|
||||
- 14 agents `model: inherit` → `model: opus` + `effort: max` (worker-tier-pin; in SE, opus=WORKER tier, Fable=frontier/lead).
|
||||
- settings.json +`autoMemoryDirectory` absolute path; `.claude/auto-memory/` created (memory relocate).
|
||||
- counter kept (h17), do-token measured.
|
||||
**But run.md still says "Owner-decision sẽ surface (KHÔNG apply)" (STALE); NO owner-decisions-S124.md; NO S124 session-log.** The RE-STAMP ritual (§L.b(j)(iv)) at closeout will re-stamp carries — a BLIND re-stamp propagates the stale state below. That is the omission surface I catch.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## FLAGS
|
||||
|
||||
### [LEAD-GAP] HIGH | gap-decision-sunk | fable-escalation possibly NO-OP (untested regression from worker-tier-pin)
|
||||
- **trigger (applied, verified):** frontmatter inherit→opus+effort:max on all 14 agents (git diff reviewer.md/lead-omission-auditor.md) + hmw.js:55-61 rationale.
|
||||
- **hứa/where the risk is documented:** `hmw.js:47-51` — comment states (a) :47-48 H23-precedence now **distinguishable EVEN at lead=Opus** (frontmatter opus ≠ fable) ⇒ obsoletes `[carry:h23-precedence-fable]` "CHỜ phiên lead=Fable"; (b) :49-51 **"Nếu frontmatter THẮNG ⇒ tier:'fable' của /fable-real = NO-OP ⇒ KHÔNG escalate Fable được"** … **"CHƯA test lượt này (frontmatter mới cần restart)"**.
|
||||
- **hiện:** VẮNG from any tracked pending-surface. NOT in run.md's 4 owner-decisions, NOT a carry, NOT surfaced to owner. Lives ONLY in a code comment. `/fable-real`+`/fable-clone` = mark `RC-...11-07-2026-20-42-01` (H21 **Active-High**, owner's frontier-escalation tool) — could be silently dead.
|
||||
- **im:** born this session (S124), unsurfaced since applied.
|
||||
- **resolve:** surface as explicit owner-decision + create carry e.g. `[carry:fable-escalation-verify]` "post-restart, spawn tier:'fable' → read resolved model via scripts/spawn-model-audit.ps1; if frontmatter wins ⇒ /fable-real broken ⇒ owner re-pin". Do NOT let it stay a code-comment-only.
|
||||
|
||||
### [LEAD-GAP] MED-HIGH | gap-carry-dropped | usermem-outside-repo (R6) — relocated on disk, carry still "chờ hub", follow-through not in work-state
|
||||
- **hứa:** `HANDOFF.md:5` "🔴 R6 chờ hub `[carry:usermem-outside-repo]`" + "settings.json 0 key ⇒ harness ép, SE **cố ý KHÔNG tự dời**"; spec §A:31 planned only "đóng carry ... → 'hub đã trả: relocate-able, self-verify' → surface owner-decision".
|
||||
- **hiện (DONE on disk, BEYOND spec plan):** hub replied (reply-wave-s122 r6 ruling). settings.json +`"autoMemoryDirectory": ".../.claude/auto-memory"` (uncommitted). `.claude/auto-memory/` exists (untracked; MEMORY.md 13179B + feedback files). NOT gitignored (`git check-ignore` exit=1 = trackable) **but UNTRACKED** ⇒ R6's actual goal "0 git/0 backup/0 history" **NOT yet met** (needs git add+commit). Relocation "CHƯA runtime-test" (needs restart).
|
||||
- **im:** state changed THIS session; carry + no WAL/owner-record reflects it.
|
||||
- **resolve:** closeout must (a) git-add+commit `.claude/auto-memory` (actually solve 0-git), (b) runtime-verify harness writes to new dir post-restart, (c) UPDATE/close carry — NOT re-stamp "chờ hub / cố ý không tự dời" (that is now false ×2: hub replied AND SE relocated).
|
||||
|
||||
### [LEAD-GAP] MED | gap-decision-sunk | 4 owner-decisions have no durable record + H8 all-inherit supersession unstamped
|
||||
- **hứa:** 4 owner-decisions applied S124 (frontmatter→opus+effort:max · memory-relocate · keep-counter · do-token-measured). Precedent: S119 got a dedicated `owner-decisions-15-07-2026.md`; ACTIVE-MARKS convention = B3 single-writer VERIFY→APPEND for governance decisions.
|
||||
- **hiện:** VẮNG. Only durable session-record = `run.md` which STILL says "Owner-decision sẽ surface (KHÔNG apply)" (contradicts applied reality). No `owner-decisions-S124.md`. No S124 session-log (latest = S123). H8 all-inherit (mark `RC-...11-07...` §K.D / erratum-h8 "all-inherit SUPERSEDED") **not annotated** as superseded by worker-tier-pin ⇒ ACTIVE-MARKS (shown every session as luật hiện-hành) still reads all-inherit while disk = opus-pin. Model-tier architecture change = owner-authority §A1 magnitude.
|
||||
- **im:** born S124, unrecorded.
|
||||
- **resolve:** closeout writes consolidated owner-decision record (like S119) + annotates/stamps H8→worker-tier-pin supersession (B3). NOTE: partly adjacent to lead-view-auditor (stale mark = "cái CÓ nhưng LỆCH"); MY flag = the MISSING record/annotation.
|
||||
|
||||
### [LEAD-GAP] MED | gap-carry-dropped | h24-2vai-chua-chay — falsified this session, will mis-stamp
|
||||
- **hứa:** `HANDOFF.md:5` "2 vai **vẫn chưa chạy lần nào** `[carry:h24-2vai-chua-chay]`" (text also "counter=2"); mark `RC-...15-32-23` BINDING CAVEAT "2 vai **CHƯA CHẠY lần nào** (spawn-probe chứng spawn được, KHÔNG chứng soi được)"; spec §C:44 uses "2 vai chưa chạy ⇒ chưa có dữ-liệu" as the keep-counter rationale.
|
||||
- **hiện:** FALSIFIED — lead-omission-auditor (this role) running S124 = **first real run (dogfood)**. Carry "counter=2" also stale (live counter=3, verified).
|
||||
- **im:** falsified in real-time this session; no record yet.
|
||||
- **resolve:** closeout records "2 vai first-run S124"; update carry; note mark `...15-32-23` caveat is now partially resolvable (pending em-main VERIFY of run quality — spawn-probe→first-real-run evidence-tier raise); refresh counter number. Do NOT re-stamp "chưa chạy lần nào".
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## gap-carry-aged — 0 fired, but MECHANISM-INFORM (report per trap #2)
|
||||
READ from `scripts/governance-detectors.ps1` H24-2 (NOT recomputed): M=6, HANDOFF logic-segments=49, carry-lines=5, all 8 carries (usermem-outside-repo, hook-vs-budget-cap, uat-s117, pe-phanquyen, bvaau, binh-le-decision, tra-bui-relogin, account-trung) **streak=1 < M=6, all [ok]**. → 0 carry is aged.
|
||||
- **BUT report-condition met (trap #2 "CÓ báo nếu W3 đã land mà streak vẫn ≡ 1"):** the RE-STAMP ritual (W3) LANDED — S122 commit `16c91a8` "…+ RE-STAMP carry" and S123 HANDOFF "🔴 RE-STAMP @S123" — YET streak ≡ 1 for EVERY carry.
|
||||
- **root:** HANDOFF Tiering rule (`HANDOFF.md:3` "giữ 2-3 session gần nhất") caps retained carry-lines **below** M=6 ⇒ `gap-carry-aged` is **structurally unable to fire** no matter how faithfully carries are re-stamped. This is the S121-known vacuousness (mark `...15-32-23` pain ③ "carry-age vacuous CẤU-TRÚC") **persisting past the W3 fix**.
|
||||
- **escalate to owner:** tiering(2-3) vs M=6 are incompatible. Either lower M for carry-age, OR exempt carry-history from tiering, OR count carry-age from a persistent ledger not the tiered HANDOFF. NOT inventing a class — this is a gap-carry-aged mechanism note.
|
||||
|
||||
## INFORM-only (NOT gaps — owner actively holds / correctly handled)
|
||||
- **6 product carries owner-held, MUST survive closeout re-stamp:** uat-s117 · pe-phanquyen · bvaau · binh-le-decision · tra-bui-relogin · account-trung. All present (detector streak=1), untouched by governance-only S124 = owner actively holds (anti-pattern #3: vắng-vì-giữ ≠ bỏ rơi). NOT gaps. Closeout MUST re-stamp all 8 anh-carries; dropping any at closeout = gap-carry-dropped (verify POST-closeout).
|
||||
- **retier-megaline: NOT dropped** (avoided task-hypothesized FP). do-token adap-report records STATUS=70,892 tok / HANDOFF=32,254 / total 103,146 = 27.1% lead budget + explicitly "`[carry:retier-megaline]` materially urgent" + surfaces owner-decision (re-tier/đổi-budget-số = owner-authority, chờ anh). Properly surfaced. (Minor: HANDOFF carry-text not yet updated with the number — closeout task.)
|
||||
- **hook-vs-budget-cap:** owner-actively-parked (🟡, "DO NOT auto-reduce", 22.8KB under both caps, em KHÔNG tự nén, chờ anh) = correctly surfaced INFORM-only, NOT a gap.
|
||||
- **s119-wave:** correctly CLOSED (tag intentionally dropped in current segment per convention; lingering tag in older retained segment = known cosmetic tiering-lag).
|
||||
- **gap-owner-specifics = 0:** owner's "Opus 4.8 MAX" fully captured = `model: opus` + `effort: max` (both in every frontmatter diff + hmw.js:55-61); autoMemoryDirectory absolute-path in settings.json; measured tokens in do-token adap-report. No lost-specifics case found. Honest zero.
|
||||
- **gap-underfill = 0:** N/A (relocation doesn't change budget fill; auto-memory MEMORY.md 13179B < 25600 autoinject cap).
|
||||
|
||||
## Propose-only. em-main = single-writer (VERIFY→APPEND B3). 0 Write/Edit outside this disk file.
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
|
||||
# lead-view-auditor — S124 adap-wave (FIRST real run / dogfood)
|
||||
|
||||
VERDICT: 9 FLAG. By class → view-residual-asym: 8 · view-stale-count: 1 · view-stale-status: 0 · view-stale-header: 0 · view-stale-role-desc: 0.
|
||||
Root cause = ONE owner-decision (S124 model-tier flip: H8 all-inherit → worker-tier-pin opus). hmw.js + 14/14 frontmatter = UPDATED (source). Derived docs/memory = NOT updated (residual). jump_on_class_repeat=3 → view-residual-asym at 8 >> 3, BUT this is ONE flip's doc-sync debt in ONE audit, not a cross-audit recurrence (first audit = seeding tally, no prior count).
|
||||
|
||||
## SOURCE OF TRUTH (verified this run)
|
||||
- 14/14 agents `.claude/agents/*.md` → `model: opus` + `effort: max` (grep confirmed, 14 pairs).
|
||||
- hmw.js FULLY updated: :46 "frontmatter 14/14 = opus, KHÔNG còn inherit" · :55 "Worker-tier-pin opus (owner-decision S124 — thay thế H8 all-inherit)" · :56 "MỌI sub-agent (14/14) → model: opus" · :74 "role có frontmatter: tất cả opus+effort:max (worker-tier-pin S124)". `TIER2_EXPECTED_FULL_ID` now at hmw.js:53 (was :50).
|
||||
- agent-memory folders on disk = 14 (incl. lead-view-auditor/ + lead-omission-auditor/, both exist, currently empty).
|
||||
- .claude/auto-memory/*.md = 50 files. settings.json has autoMemoryDirectory.
|
||||
|
||||
## MACHINE BASELINE (governance-detectors.ps1 — read, NOT re-run as mine)
|
||||
Machine already owns: C3 vocab-fork `two-tier=21f vs all-inherit=39f coexist`; H24-3 STATUS.md:6 session-label lag (S119<S123); H24-1 2 title-stale (rag-setup-plan, form-engine SKILL); C2 derived count-stale (test/table/mig). TOTAL 45.
|
||||
MY LAYER = the semantic call the machine can't make: which all-inherit occurrences are a LIVE claim S124 turned stale (machine only sees "2 variants coexist", not "both name a superseded policy"), + surfaces outside the machine's count-set (README diagram, agent-memory folder count, GAP#6 logic-inversion, auto-memory content, hmw.js line-drift).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## FLAGS
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] HIGH | view-residual-asym | view: .claude/agents/README.md:38 | source: hmw.js:55-56 + 14/14 frontmatter | view nói "Harness-8 all-inherit: MỌI sub model:inherit = top-tier lead" (architecture diagram) vs source "worker-tier-pin: 14/14 model:opus+effort:max, KHÔNG còn inherit" | resolve: diagram mô-tả worker-tier-pin opus (hmw.js updated, README = canonical example "sửa hmw.js quên agents/README"). README read @session-start (session-start.md:91) ⇒ HIGH.
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] HIGH | view-residual-asym | view: .claude/commands/session-start.md:50 | source: hmw.js:46 | view nói "frontmatter toàn roster = inherit (H8 all-inherit). Chưa ai test bên nào THẮNG" (BƯỚC 0.6, chạy MỖI phiên) vs source "frontmatter 14/14 = opus, KHÔNG còn inherit" | resolve: cập-nhật BƯỚC 0.6 precedence-note theo hmw.js:44-48 (H23 precedence NAY testable vì frontmatter=opus≠fable — inverted premise). HIGH: executed every session + premise flipped.
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] MED | view-residual-asym | view: .claude/commands/session-start.md:43 | source: hmw.js:55-56 | view nói outage-path "promote inherit tự theo lead → two-tier tạm collapse single-tier Opus" vs source "workers ĐÃ opus-pinned; không có inherit-follow-lead, không có two-tier để collapse" | resolve: outage-path outcome (fallback opus) vẫn đúng nhưng MECHANISM (inherit-follows-lead / two-tier→single) stale ⇒ reword.
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] HIGH | view-residual-asym | view: .claude/commands/fable-clone.md:63 (+:57 +:43) | source: hmw.js:44-52,74 | view nói :63 "frontmatter toàn roster = inherit (hmw.js:46-49 mang cùng ghi-chú này)" · :57 "Thiếu tier ⇒ role-có-frontmatter → model:inherit → lane ăn model của LEAD" · :43 "all-inherit che leak" vs source "frontmatter=opus; thiếu tier ⇒ resolveModel trả undefined ⇒ frontmatter opus tự lo (hmw.js:74), KHÔNG inherit-lead" | resolve: GAP#6 rationale INVERTED — cross-ref "hmw.js:46-49 mang cùng ghi-chú" nay BROKEN (hmw.js:44-52 = ghi-chú MỚI opus-precedence). GAP#6 vẫn có value cho tier:'fable' escalation nhưng failure-mode "lane ăn model LEAD without tier" nay sai. Sub-note: :66 trỏ "hmw.js:50" cho TIER2_EXPECTED_FULL_ID — nay ở hmw.js:53 (line-drift). HIGH.
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] MED | view-residual-asym | view: .claude/commands/ultra-on.md:35 (+:9) | source: hmw.js:55-56 | view nói P2-execute ":35 H8 all-inherit (S66): role-có-frontmatter inherit top-tier lead" · ":9 H8 all-inherit S66" vs source "worker-tier-pin opus S124 thay thế H8 all-inherit" | resolve: cập-nhật P2 fan-out note sang worker-tier-pin.
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] MED | view-stale-count | view: .claude/agents/README.md:222 | source: ls .claude/agent-memory/*/ = 14 folders | view nói "12 folder: investigator-codebase · … · harvest-curator" (liệt-kê 12, thiếu lead-view-auditor + lead-omission-auditor) vs source "14 folder tồn-tại trên đĩa" | resolve: cập-nhật 12→14 + thêm 2 tên. Nuance: 2 dir mới trống (chưa MEMORY.md) — nhưng là roster-member có dir. Machine-blind (detector chỉ đếm STATUS canonical set mig/test/gotcha/table/menu/policy, KHÔNG đếm agent-folder).
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] MED | view-residual-asym | view: .claude/auto-memory/project_harness4_two_tier_model.md:3,10,13-15,21 (+ index MEMORY.md:45) | source: hmw.js:55-56 + 14/14 frontmatter | view nói "two-tier model — 4 promote-inherit / 7 demote-pin Opus, runtime-VERIFIED" vs source "worker-tier-pin: 14/14 opus, KHÔNG two-tier" | resolve: memory DOUBLY-superseded (H4 two-tier → H8 all-inherit → S124 worker-tier-pin) nhưng auto-inject MỖI phiên như current (đã ở system-reminder run này). Lead memory-update/supersede (INFORM — lead=sole memory-writer; NOT doc-edit). Counts inside (4+7=11) chưa từng khớp 14.
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] MED | view-residual-asym | view: docs/STATUS.md:6 (mega-line, neo bằng TRÍCH) trích "all-inherit top-tier (Harness-8 S66 06-16 — thay thế two-tier H4)" + "model-tier 12/12 (SE all-inherit form-valid…)" | source: hmw.js:55-56 + 14/14 opus | view nói current-topology "all-inherit top-tier" + count "12/12" vs source "worker-tier-pin opus 14/14" | resolve: cập-nhật topology-descriptor + 12/12→14/14. 🔴 HONEST CAVEAT: STATUS.md:6 = mega-line TRỘN current-topology (flag) VỚI frozen session-narrative (lead ĐÃ khai frozen @ACTIVE-MARKS.md:37 "narrative STATUS/HANDOFF = Đóng băng CÓ CHỦ-ĐÍCH"). em-main PHẢI tách per-occurrence: live-topology=sửa, dated-session-report=để yên. Neo bằng excerpt KHÔNG col (mega-line). Machine đã flag STATUS ở C3 vocab-fork — add của tôi = semantic "occurrence live-topology nay policy-stale".
|
||||
|
||||
[LEAD-VIEW] LOW | view-residual-asym | view: docs/HANDOFF.md:5 (mega-line) — 1 occurrence "all-inherit" | source: hmw.js:55-56 | view nói (1×) "all-inherit" vs source "worker-tier-pin opus" | resolve: LOW-confidence — HANDOFF.md:5 mega-line, occurrence có thể là frozen S123-brief HOẶC live carry. em-main verify live-carry vs frozen-brief TRƯỚC khi động. Nếu frozen-brief ⇒ KHÔNG flag (đóng-băng có chủ-đích).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## VERIFIED CLEAN (report negative — chống false-alarm)
|
||||
- memory-budget.json harness_floor / token_governor: grep inherit|two-tier|all-inherit|worker-tier = 0 match. Focus #4 = CLEAN. (Sub-note: `measured` block liệt 12 agent + harness_floor note "roster 11->12+2 monitor" = DATED S107/S112 snapshot/rationale, KHÔNG current-policy claim ⇒ không flag; measurement legitimately lags.)
|
||||
- ACTIVE-MARKS.md mark bodies: 0 "all-inherit". Mark RC-…11-07-2026-20-42-01 body "∈ roster 12" ĐÃ có annotation (:39-43 "roster 12 = ảnh chụp"). Mark RC-…15-32-23 (H24) mô-tả roster→14 ĐÚNG. Focus #3 = CLEAN (annotation hiện-hữu đủ; KHÔNG cần annotation MỚI cho all-inherit). CẤM sửa body (P4/P8) — đúng như task dặn.
|
||||
- session-start.md:98 "10 product/quality + 4 monitor" = 14 total ✓. session-start.md:65 "14/14 ALIVE" (S122 probe) ✓. STATUS.md:57 "roster→14" ✓. Count 14 (focus #6) = ĐÚNG post-S124.
|
||||
|
||||
## LANE CHECK
|
||||
Tất cả 9 flag = "present-but-wrong" (view lệch source), KHÔNG "missing" (= lead-omission-auditor) KHÔNG tooling-freshness (= tooling-auditor) KHÔNG harvest-integrity (= harvest-curator). Auto-memory content-staleness = view-lecheck (mine), KHÔNG harvest lane. Propose-only, 0 Write/Edit ngoài file này.
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
|
||||
# sub-reviewer-1 — L1 SCOPE / AUTHORITY-BOUNDARY lens (S124 adap-wave)
|
||||
|
||||
**VERDICT: PASS_WITH_FIXES (0 over-reach / 1 Major / 4 minor)** — L1 FAIL-criterion is "≥1 real over-reach"; I found **0 over-reach**. Every owner-property (frontmatter model-tier · cadence-counter numbers · budget-numbers · settings.json) is correctly classified owner-gated WITH surface-to-owner. The lead is conservative and correct on authority boundaries. Fixes below are honest-nac / completeness on the OUTWARD adap-reports, not authority grabs.
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewer = adversarial, independent. Verified from source broadcasts + SE state files, not the lead's summary.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Per-item authority verdict (acceptance: in-frame-ĐÚNG | owner-gated-SÓT | over-reach)
|
||||
|
||||
| Item | Lead classification | My verdict | Anchor |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| B / E-1 frontmatter all-inherit→worker-tier-pin | owner-gated, surface owner, keep H23 carry | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** (correct owner-gate, no over-reach) | verified 14/14 agents `model: inherit` (`.claude/agents/*.md:5`); model-tier = governance per mark `RC-…11-07…20-42-01` §K.E |
|
||||
| B / E-2 EOL title | in-frame, 0-change, adap `verified` | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** (minor: missing control-group caveat) | erratum-2:28 credits SE falsification; :32 flags single-probe |
|
||||
| C h17 counter | keep counter (default-valid) + surface owner | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** (no over-reach; reason "phiên dài" imperfect) | broadcast §6.1/§6.4 "mặc-định hợp-lệ = giữ nguyên" |
|
||||
| D do-token | MEASURE=in-frame, CHANGE-number=owner-gated | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** (boundary correct) | `memory-budget.json:97` role_boundary_note; broadcast §5 |
|
||||
| E bon-vong | n-a-aligned + 3 reflection | **in-frame-ĐÚNG classification** — but "AHEAD hub" = honest overclaim (see M-1) | `.session-counter.json:18` last_audit=0 + :23 "have not run" |
|
||||
| F push-guard/presence | already-done, reconcile adap-report | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** (must carry TRAILING trade-off caveat) | `session-end.md §5.2:187-223`; run.md:15 self-caught |
|
||||
| r6 relocate autoMemoryDirectory | owner-gated (settings.json + workspace-trust + runtime) | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** (correct — workspace-trust = human gate) | reply §7:44-50 |
|
||||
| R3 hook side-ref | owner-gated, ĐÓNG câu hỏi, KHÔNG tự làm | **in-frame-ĐÚNG** | reply §4:30-31 |
|
||||
|
||||
**L1 result: 0 over-reach → PASSES the FAIL-criterion.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings
|
||||
|
||||
### M-1 (Major) — Spec E "AHEAD hub" overclaim in OUTWARD adap-report
|
||||
- **Anchor:** spec `②.E` line 55 reflection (1): "SE có KIỂM-role cho loop-1/2 … **có thể AHEAD hub**".
|
||||
- **Defect:** SE's loop-1/2 monitor roles (`lead-view-auditor` + `lead-omission-auditor`, also `tooling-auditor`/`harvest-curator`) have **NEVER RUN**. Ground-truth: `.claude/governance/.session-counter.json:18` `last_audit.light_at_counter: 0` + `:23` `_note` "the 2 monitor roles land in W2 but **have not run**" + mark `RC-…15-32-23` binding-caveat "2 vai CHƯA CHẠY lần nào (spawn-probe chứng spawn được, KHÔNG chứng soi được)".
|
||||
- The hub's loop-3 ran **n=1** (bon-vong §2). Claiming SE is "AHEAD" of hub while SE's equivalent roles are **n=0** **inverts the evidence position** — SE has WEAKER demonstrated evidence, not stronger. This is the meta-count / self-coverage blind-spot (lead measures well, counts-about-self poorly).
|
||||
- Lead DOES hedge ("chưa soi-lẫn-nhau độc-lập") but that's about mutual-independence, not the sharper truth (n=0 never-ran). An adap-report going TO the hub that says "AHEAD" is exactly the overclaim the hub's own bon-vong §6 honest-note (:100 "thứ-bậc ≠ độ tin-cậy") warns against.
|
||||
- **Acceptance to fix:** adap-report E must nac "AHEAD" DOWN to the hub's OWN nac for its bookend replacement — "SE has the roles DEFINED (structure/design) but **n=0 runs** = designed-not-proven, same mốc-0 as hub." Remove or explicitly caveat "AHEAD."
|
||||
|
||||
### m-2 (minor) — Spec F adap-report must carry TRAILING trade-off caveat, not "ahead-of-broadcast"
|
||||
- **Anchor:** spec `②.F` line 58 "SE REFINEMENT **ahead-of-broadcast**"; F-action line 61 adap "refinement TRAILING".
|
||||
- **Defect:** TRAILING-K deliberately accepts sandwiched `wal:` as noise (`session-end.md §5.0:178` "GIỮ NGUYÊN, chấp-nhận noise") = the **source of the "57 wal: lọt origin/main"** (S119). Lead **self-caught** this in run.md:15 ("KHÔNG phải thuần ahead-of-broadcast … trade-off owner-accepted") — good — but spec-F prose + the planned adap-report still read as pure "ahead." The adap-report to hub must state: TRAILING = trade-off (no-rewrite-history > zero-leak, owner-4 "KHÔNG dọn 57"), NOT unqualified "ahead."
|
||||
|
||||
### m-3 (minor) — Spec B/E-2 "verified" omits control-group caveat
|
||||
- **Anchor:** spec `②.B` E-2 line 37 "adap-report `verified` (SE là nguồn falsification), 0 change".
|
||||
- **Defect:** erratum-2:32 + reply:17 note SE's CRLF-fatal falsification was a **single-probe** experiment lacking a parallel LF control-group; the mechanism-conclusion was right and SE was credited, but the honest-note should acknowledge the single-probe limitation (the bon-vong control-group lesson applies to SE's OWN experiment too). Completeness, not a change.
|
||||
|
||||
### m-4 (minor) — Spec D real-token numbers may be partial-read, not whole-file N
|
||||
- **Anchor:** spec `②.D` line 48 "STATUS folded chunk 360-dòng = **26075 tok**, HANDOFF 404-dòng = **32988 tok**".
|
||||
- **Defect:** do-token broadcast §5 step 2 requires Read **WHOLE file, NO offset/limit** for the truncation-line N to equal whole-file tokens. "folded chunk 360-dòng" implies a paginated/partial read → the N may reflect the requested slice, not the true whole-file total. Re-measure via full-file force-truncate before recording as "real-token" in any owner-facing report. (Could NOT independently reproduce the token count — flagged as caveat, not confirmed-wrong.)
|
||||
|
||||
### note-5 (reasoning-quality, non-blocking) — Spec C "phiên DÀI → keep" is imperfect
|
||||
- **Anchor:** spec `②.C` line 42/44.
|
||||
- phiên-dài actually **resembles the hub's REMOVAL nền** (one-session-per-day, few-long — bon-vong §4 point 1). The robust keep-rationale is: §6.4 default-valid + roles-never-ran (n=0, no data to justify EITHER direction) + owner-cost decision → surface. Conclusion (keep + surface) is correct; the specific "phiên dài" reason is weak. Non-blocking because surfaced to owner.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Positive validations (resisted scrutiny)
|
||||
- **E-1 correctly gated:** verified all 14 `model: inherit`; model-tier IS owner-authority (mark H21 §K.E floor-point 3 "lead = frontier-class do anh chọn … CẤM Sonnet/Haiku ghế lead"). Tangling with H23-precedence-DEFER is honest (lead=Opus cannot distinguish spawn-param ⟂ frontmatter — reply §2 lineage confirms floor).
|
||||
- **h17 supersession correctly SCOPED:** lead retires ONLY the cadence-scheduler, does NOT over-retire SE's 2 monitor roles / enum / roster-14 (h17 frontmatter supersedes_scope:11 explicitly KEEPS the 4 floor points). A careless reader would over-apply the supersession; lead avoided it.
|
||||
- **carry-age = KEEP, "ngưỡng KHÔNG thuộc counter"** (spec C:40) — matches broadcast §3 point 2 exactly (the trap: "Gỡ nhịp mà gỡ nhầm nó thì bạn giết chính detector"). Lead correctly did NOT kill the carry-age detector.
|
||||
- **counter=3 / first-cadence ~S127-128 FACTUALLY CORRECT** (verified `.session-counter.json:13` counter=3, light_every=6, last_audit=0 → OVERDUE at counter=6 = ~S127).
|
||||
- **do-token measure/change boundary** correct per `role_boundary_note` + `crystallized_backfill._target_note` (AI = measure+report %, owner = set number).
|
||||
- **r6 + R3 correctly owner-gated** — r6 needs workspace-trust (human gate) + runtime-verify (reply:50 "chưa runtime-test"); R3 reply §4 explicit "owner phải ký riêng."
|
||||
|
||||
## Could NOT verify
|
||||
- do-token real-token N (26075/32988) — could not reproduce the exact tokenizer count locally (m-4).
|
||||
- Whether the planned adap-reports (E "AHEAD", F "ahead", E-2 "verified") will ship WITH or WITHOUT the caveats — they are PLANNED text; I reviewed the plan, not a written artifact. Fixes are pre-ship.
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
||||
# L2 — FIDELITY-TO-SOURCE review (reviewer lane 2, @MAX)
|
||||
|
||||
**VERDICT: PASS_WITH_FIXES (0 clean broadcast-content misread / 1 MAJOR framing-overclaim / 3 minor)**
|
||||
|
||||
Lens: did the lead read each broadcast correctly? Verified from the broadcast files themselves + SE state (session-end.md, memory-budget.json, ACTIVE-MARKS.md, agent frontmatter, adap-reports dir). 5 of 6 trap-items are read-faithful; the push-guard "ahead-of-broadcast" framing is an overclaim.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Item-by-item {read-faithful | misread}
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. do-token (type:new, NOT-adopt) — READ-FAITHFUL
|
||||
- Spec D line 46 labels it "new/draft, NOT-adopt — METHOD". Matches broadcast §5 ("Lấy PHƯƠNG-PHÁP. ĐỪNG lấy CON SỐ của hub") + §7 line 107 ("Bản này KHÔNG yêu-cầu bạn adopt gì").
|
||||
- Lead's ACTION = (1) measure real-token-N of SE mega-files, (2) audit SE "measured" constants for the "nhãn đã-đo thay việc-đo" trap, (3) PROPOSE assert-constant-BAO-real-measure net. All three are METHOD-application, not number-copy. Faithful to broadcast §4-§5.
|
||||
- N>cap logic read correctly (spec:47 vs broadcast §1 line 27). "4.05 vượt trần 4.0 / sống 42 phiên" read correctly (spec:47 vs broadcast §3:60, §4:66).
|
||||
- POSITIVE: lead actually applied the method this session (spec:48 STATUS 26075 tok / HANDOFF 32988 tok, both > cap 25000) rather than just citing it. Audit target `harness_floor.measured_token_estimate=55000` correctly characterized as "~19K byte-measured + ~36K est" — verified against memory-budget.json:90 `_s112_remeasure_note` ("55000 = honest mid estimate (~19K byte-measured + ~36K harness-injected-est)"). This is a correct catch of a half-estimated "measured" constant — exactly the do-token lesson.
|
||||
- Budget-number changes correctly flagged owner-gated (spec:50, grounded in memory-budget.json:97 role_boundary_note + mark RC-...01-58-01).
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. bon-vong (type:new, NOT-adopt) — READ-FAITHFUL
|
||||
- Spec E line 52 labels "new, NOT-adopt — spirit + evidence". Matches broadcast §5 ("Không bắt-buộc gì cả") + §6:96 ("Đừng chép con số 4").
|
||||
- Lessons read correctly: redundancy>single-net (broadcast §2:48), "im-lặng có chữ-ký" + "gỡ hàng → hạng-mục hiện lại" + don't anchor mechanism-test to a live row (broadcast §3:69), eval-layer weakest (broadcast §4). Lead ACTION = reflection/adap-report `n-a-mostly-aligned`, no code-change. Faithful.
|
||||
- Lead's loop-map (spec:54) is SE's OWN self-assessment, not a claim about the broadcast; the broadcast's 4-loop content + "only loop-3 has KIEM role, loop-4 not closed" is not misrepresented.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. erratum-h8 E-1 (scope-narrow: only MODEL) — READ-FAITHFUL
|
||||
- Spec B line 34: "Chỉ vế MODEL đổi; vế 'workflow chạy nhanh nhất' của H8 GIỮ." Exact match to broadcast Erratum-1 line 23 ("Chỉ vế MODEL bị thay — vế 'workflow chạy nhanh nhất' của broadcast H8 GIỮ nguyên").
|
||||
- Floor read correctly: "lead owner-choice + sub-có-memory worker-tier gán-cứng + roster/form sister-quyết" = broadcast:23.
|
||||
- DELTA correctly identified + correctly owner-gated: agent frontmatter is all-inherit → don't self-change to pin. VERIFIED: all 14 roster `.claude/agents/*.md` = `model: inherit` (grep confirmed). Lead correctly defers frontmatter change to owner + keeps carry `h23-precedence-fable`. Faithful.
|
||||
- E-2 (EOL title): spec:37 reads "CRLF ∧ unquoted ': '" mechanism + SE credited — matches broadcast Erratum-2:28. adap-report `2026-07-15-Governance-eol-crlf-agent-registry-defect-notice.md` EXISTS (verified). Faithful.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. h17-cadence-bookend (supersedes ONLY cadence-scheduler) — READ-FAITHFUL
|
||||
- Spec C line 40: "4 sàn KEEP (2 vai soi lead · 2 detector [title-freshness + carry-age, ngưỡng KHÔNG thuộc counter] · positive-control · roster-3-việc). caveat (b)(d) keep." Exact match to broadcast §3 floors (1)(2)(4)(5) + line 50 caveat (b)(d).
|
||||
- CRITICAL trap avoided: broadcast §3 line 46 warns "gỡ nhịp mà gỡ nhầm [carry-age threshold] thì bạn giết chính detector." Lead explicitly preserves it ("ngưỡng KHÔNG thuộc counter"). Faithful — did NOT remove the 4 floors.
|
||||
- Did lead say "SE phải chuyển bookend"? NO. Spec:42-44 reads §4 "Đừng gỡ theo hub", correctly concludes default-valid = GIỮ counter (SE = long sessions), and surfaces switch-to-bookend as an owner-decision with a KEEP recommendation. Consistent with broadcast §6.4 ("Mặc-định hợp-lệ = giữ nguyên") + §4 limit-2 (replacement n=0, don't copy). Faithful.
|
||||
- §5 API-key close read correctly (spec:43 vs broadcast §5). `held_clause` correctly identified as hub-internal contextual_retrieval → SE ignore (broadcast frontmatter held_clause_DO_NOT_PUBLISH). Faithful.
|
||||
- h24_cadence 6/15/3 VERIFIED (memory-budget.json:124-126) + owner-ratified with the exact hub caveat already carried (memory-budget.json:123 "do NOT copy these three... DELIBERATE STARTING POINT... re-tune after cycle-2"). SE state already consistent.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. reply r6 constraint ("absolute path hoặc ~/, KHÔNG ./") — READ-FAITHFUL
|
||||
- Spec A line 29 / D-plan: "autoMemoryDirectory trong settings.json (absolute path hoặc ~/, KHÔNG ./), mọi scope. Docs-verified, CHƯA runtime-test. → owner-gated." Exact match to reply §7:42-46 (must be absolute or ~/, NOT relative ./; workspace-trust; hub docs-verified not runtime-tested). Correctly owner-gated. Faithful.
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. push-guard TRAILING framing — ⚠️ MISREAD/OVERCLAIM (MAJOR)
|
||||
**This is the one defect.** The task flagged: "Bắt overclaim nếu lead bán 'ahead' mà giấu leak-trade-off." Confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
- Broadcast dd4b0176 §4:53 requires: count wal: in `<remote-branch>..HEAD` (ahead-range) and "con số đó PHẢI bằng 0" — its reference impl (§4 line 73) uses `grep -c '^wal:'` = counts ALL wal: in the ahead range (trailing AND sandwiched). n>0 → BLOCK push.
|
||||
- SE's implementation (session-end.md §5.0:164-166 + §5.2:194) counts **only TRAILING** wal: (consecutive from HEAD, stop at first non-wal:). §5.0:178 EXPLICITLY keeps sandwiched wal:: "wal: kẹp sâu hơn (sandwiched DƯỚI commit thường chưa-push) → GIỮ NGUYÊN, chấp-nhận noise (hard-safety đổi lấy không-rewrite-lịch-sử-đã-đẩy)."
|
||||
- **Therefore SE is LOOSER than the broadcast, not "ahead."** In the sandwiched case (ahead-range = `[wal_1, CLAUDE_2]`), broadcast → n=1 → BLOCK until squashed; SE → K=0 → PUSH with wal_1 leaking to remote (session-end §5.2:220 ca(2) `base+wal+[CLAUDE]`→K=0→PUSH). On the turn-boundary-chaining dimension SE only MATCHES the broadcast (both chain squash+push in one turn, broadcast §5:90) — there is NO dimension where SE is strictly "ahead."
|
||||
- Spec F line 58 sells this as "SE REFINEMENT ahead-of-broadcast". Proposed adap-report nấc (spec:61) = "agreed+executed S122, refinement TRAILING" — carries the "refinement/ahead" framing to the hub WITHOUT disclosing it is a looser variant that accepts a leak.
|
||||
- The lead's OWN run.md line 15 already self-caught the honest framing: "TRAILING-K refinement = nguồn của '57 wal: lọt origin/main' S119 (sandwiched-keep §5.0:178) = trade-off owner-accepted... KHÔNG phải thuần 'ahead-of-broadcast'." And SE's OWN owner-stamped mark RC-pqhuy1987-15-07-2026-15-32-20 clause (4) frames it as "noise CHẤP-NHẬN (đổi lấy không-rewrite-lịch-sử-đã-đẩy)" — i.e., an accepted-cost divergence, NOT an improvement.
|
||||
- So the SPEC contradicts both run.md and SE's own mark. **Fix:** relabel push-guard from "refinement ahead-of-broadcast" → "adopted + DIVERGE-LOOSER (trailing-only vs broadcast's ahead-range-all-count), owner-accepted sandwiched-leak trade-off (mark RC-...15-32-20 cl.4; evidence: 57 wal: on origin/main S119, owner-4 'KHÔNG dọn 57')". The adap-report to hub MUST disclose this divergence, not sell "refinement". If shipped unqualified → hub-facing overclaim = FAIL.
|
||||
- Severity MAJOR (not FAIL-level): lead correctly understood the broadcast's actual requirement; the defect is self-characterization, already partially corrected in run.md — a reconcile-before-ship fix.
|
||||
|
||||
Adoption itself VERIFIED-TRUE (so "agreed+executed S122" nấc is correct): session-end §5.2 implements squash→count→push chained; fault-inject 10/10 (§5.2:219); mark RC-...15-32-20 anh-confirm S122; adap-report `2026-07-13-Governance-harness-22-wal-defect-fix.md` exists.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Other verified-faithful (positive validation)
|
||||
- 9 Active-High in ACTIVE-MARKS.md (matches task-stated 9). ✓
|
||||
- presence-not-age: adap-report `docs/governance/adap-reports/2026-07-13-Governance-presence-not-age-reinject.md` EXISTS; broadcast inbox id = `2026-07-13-Governance-adap-update-presence-not-age-reinject.md` → the "adap-update- prefix" name-mismatch lead flagged (spec:60) is REAL. Faithful housekeeping.
|
||||
- R2/R3/R4/§8 (reply) all read faithfully (spec:26-30 vs reply §3/§4/§5/§8).
|
||||
|
||||
## Minor
|
||||
- m1: real-token measurements (STATUS 26075 / HANDOFF 32988 tok, spec:48) not independently re-measured by me — method is sound, numbers are the lead's; hub-facing use should keep the "measured this session" caveat.
|
||||
- m2: run.md's attribution "TRAILING-K = nguồn của 57 wal: lọt origin/main" is only partially causal — the 57 is mostly historical pushed-wal: accumulation (git log HEAD full-history count, session-end §5.0(b):176); trailing-K is why sandwiched ones CONTINUE to leak going forward. Honest enough, but the adap-report shouldn't imply trailing-K alone created all 57.
|
||||
- m3: spec:59 says eol adap-report "tồn-tại S122" but file is dated 2026-07-15 (= S122 date, OK) — trivial.
|
||||
|
||||
## Could-NOT-verify (caveats)
|
||||
- I did not re-run the force-truncate to reproduce the 26075/32988 real-token numbers.
|
||||
- The "presence-not-age-reinject" broadcast is NOT in this wave's 5-file source set (it's a prior 07-13 inbox item) — I verified the SE-side adap-report + broadcast-id name only, not the original adoption correctness.
|
||||
- L1-authority (over-reach) is lane-1's remit; I checked owner-gating only through the fidelity lens and found the 4 owner-gated items (E-1 frontmatter, do-token budget, r6 settings.json, h17 keep-vs-bookend) correctly classified.
|
||||
@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
|
||||
# sub-reviewer-3 — L3 HONEST-NẤC / OVERCLAIM lens (S124 adap-wave-reply plan)
|
||||
|
||||
**VERDICT: PASS_WITH_FIXES — 0C / 3M / 2m**
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewer: adversarial L3 (nấc G-011 + do-token real-N logic + meta-count self-coverage + asymmetry).
|
||||
Independent verification from source (broadcasts + reply + SE state + LIVE harness truncation), not from lead summary.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## GROUND-TRUTH measured THIS turn (the crux)
|
||||
|
||||
Read whole-file, no offset/limit (do-token method), observed the actual harness truncation line:
|
||||
|
||||
- **STATUS.md** → truncation verbatim: `showing the first 37319 of 124503 characters (70892 tokens, cap 25000); ... cannot be paginated by line`. ⇒ **whole-file = 70892 tokens** (124503 chars). File = 239 lines by `wc -l` (longest line = 69870 chars @ line 6).
|
||||
- **HANDOFF.md** → truncation verbatim: `showing lines 1-3 of 13 total (32254 tokens, cap 25000)`. ⇒ **whole-file = 32254 tokens**. File = 13 lines (longest line = 59961 chars @ line 5).
|
||||
- **STATUS.md offset=7 limit=240** (tail after the mega-line) → error `File content (33944 tokens) exceeds maximum allowed tokens (25000)`. ⇒ even the NON-mega tail alone = **33944 tokens** > spec's claimed whole-file 26075.
|
||||
|
||||
Spec D:48 claims: `STATUS folded chunk 360-dòng = 26075 tok, HANDOFF 404-dòng = 32988 tok`.
|
||||
|
||||
| file | spec token | real token (this turn) | spec line-count | real line-count |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| STATUS | 26075 | **70892** (2.72× under) | "360-dòng" | 239 (char-mode, "cannot paginate by line") |
|
||||
| HANDOFF | 32988 | 32254 (~2% over, ~OK) | "404-dòng" | 13 |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## FINDING M-1 (Major) — do-token STATUS number wrong 2.72×, and it's the exact trap being adopted
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchor:** spec `spec-adap-wave-reply-15-07-2026.md:48` ("em ĐÃ thấy real-N từ chính harness lượt này — STATUS folded chunk 360-dòng = 26075 tok").
|
||||
|
||||
- Real whole-file STATUS = **70892 tokens** (my truncation line, this turn). Spec says 26075 → off by **2.72×**.
|
||||
- 26075 > cap 25000, so by the do-token rule the lead *treated it as* whole-file — but it is NOT. STATUS's tail-alone (lines 7-246) is already 33944 tok. 26075 ≈ the near-cap SHOWN-chunk count, i.e. `N của phần hiển-thị`, which do-token broadcast:27 explicitly says is NOT the whole file. The lead's own word "**folded chunk**" = read a partial/folded view, violating do-token method (`Read TRỌN, KHÔNG offset/limit` — do-token:89).
|
||||
- This is the do-token failure mode (wrong token constant → wrong capacity picture) committed **in the very act of adopting do-token**. Mirror of the broadcast's own §4 lesson "nhãn 'đã đo' thay cho việc đo": lead labels it "đã thấy real-N" but the number is a mis-measure.
|
||||
- **Impact — feeds owner-decision #3** (spec:80 "real-token đo được → re-tier / đổi budget-số"). 70892 = 18.7% of the 380K lead hot-feed budget; 26075 = 6.9%. Surfacing 26075 under-states STATUS's always-on cost by ~2.7× → materially misleads the owner's re-tier decision (could make owner think re-tier is not urgent when STATUS alone eats ~1/5 of lead budget).
|
||||
- HANDOFF (32988 vs real 32254) is within noise (~2%) — acceptable. Only STATUS is broken. Line-count labels (360/404 vs real 239/13) are both wrong but harmless mislabels.
|
||||
- **Acceptance to fix:** re-Read STATUS.md FULL (no offset/limit), take the whole-file `N tokens` from the truncation line (currently 70892), correct the spec + owner surface. Do not surface 26075.
|
||||
|
||||
## FINDING M-2 (Major) — meta-count self-coverage: "6 adap-request R1-R6" but only 5 addressed; R5 dropped
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchor:** spec:24 ("Nội-dung chính = trả lời 6 adap-request R1-R6") vs spec:25-31 enumerates R1,R2,R3,R4/EOL,r6,§8 — **R5 absent**. Reply source `reply-wave-s122.md:36-39` §6 = "R5 orphan + r5-amend RETIRE-LEGACY".
|
||||
|
||||
- The reply calls R5 (RETIRE-LEGACY + §3.1 citation-trap + §3.2 Goodhart) "**phần hub thấy giá-trị nhất cả wave**" and gives an explicit hub position: honest-defer, "**KHÔNG cam-kết fix**" (in truth-floor round-5, chưa chốt).
|
||||
- This is the S119 meta-count self-coverage blind-spot: count-says-6, list-shows-5, and the omitted item is SE's OWN highest-value contribution. The resulting adap-report would fail to record hub's honest-defer nấc on the very cluster SE already shipped (SE marks RC-...17-23-10 = DUAL-ACCEPT + retire-legacy + citation-trap guard + H24-3).
|
||||
- **Acceptance to fix:** add an R5 line to section A: SE-side nấc = `executed S123 (mark RC-...17-23-10)`, hub-side nấc = `input-received, honest-defer, no-commit` — do NOT let the adap-report imply hub accepted/verified these.
|
||||
|
||||
## FINDING M-3 (Major) — C h17 nấc "verified" overclaims a cadence that has never run
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchor:** spec:44 proposes adap-report nấc `verified, không-đổi-cơ-chế (config-based)`.
|
||||
|
||||
- SE's own binding caveat, mark `ACTIVE-MARKS.md RC-pqhuy1987-15-07-2026-15-32-23` (Active-High CAVEAT): "**2 vai CHƯA CHẠY lần nào · counter CHƯA tick · nhịp 6/15/3 = điểm khởi-đầu owner cố-ý chọn, KHÔNG phải 'đã chứng-minh hiệu-quả'** (hub: n=1 = mocc-0; chỉnh lại sau chu-kỳ-2)."
|
||||
- `memory-budget.json h24_cadence._owner_ratified`: "HONEST-CAVEAT to carry when reporting to hub ... Re-tune after cycle-2 ... nobody may sell 'proven effective' yet."
|
||||
- Hub's own expected report format (h17 broadcast:86 §6.1) = "**đã đọc, không đổi**" = an acknowledgment (`agreed` nấc), NOT `verified`. A cadence mechanism that has executed zero cycles cannot be "verified".
|
||||
- The spec DOES carry the "chưa chạy / chưa dữ-liệu" caveat elsewhere (spec:44, inside the owner-decision reasoning) — but it is NOT attached to the PROPOSED NẤC. Reporting bare "verified" to hub drops SE's own caveat (S119 giữ-kết-luận-phải-giữ-caveat) and conflates "config-structure is single-source (verifiable)" with "cadence mechanism is verified (false — never ran)".
|
||||
- **Acceptance to fix:** nấc → `agreed / đã-đọc-không-đổi (config single-source)` + explicit caveat "cadence chưa chạy lần nào; 6/15/3 = owner-chosen unproven starting point; re-tune after cycle-2; hub said 'do NOT copy these three'".
|
||||
|
||||
## FINDING m-4 (minor) — E-2 nấc "verified" drops SE's own "CHƯA VERIFY / model-incomplete" nuance
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchor:** spec:37 proposes E-2 nấc `verified (SE là nguồn falsification)`.
|
||||
|
||||
- SE's own STATUS L3 (`docs/STATUS.md:6`) documents the OPPOSITE-direction nuance: "**L3 → CHƯA VERIFY** ... regex delimiter LF-only ×2 song song bản vá ⇒ **CRLF đơn-độc CÓ THỂ đủ giết** ⇒ mô-hình broadcast THIẾU ... **hạ nấc**". Plus erratum-h8:32 + reply:17 note SE's probe lacked a control-group ("một probe đơn dễ ra kết-luận sai theo hướng có lợi").
|
||||
- SE's honest position = "my one probe (a fully-CRLF agent) survived → falsifies 'always fatal'; BUT an unverified LF-only regex path might still kill CRLF-alone, so I lowered my own nấc." Bare "verified" sells a cleaner conclusion than SE holds.
|
||||
- **Acceptance:** keep "credit + 0 change", but nấc caveat = "single-probe falsification (specific agent survived); full mechanism NOT verified — SE flagged an unverified LF-only path (STATUS L3), control-group recommended by hub".
|
||||
|
||||
## FINDING m-5 (minor, cross-lane with L2) — F "ahead-of-broadcast" framing drops the 57-leak trade-off
|
||||
|
||||
**Anchor:** spec:58 frames TRAILING-K as "SE REFINEMENT ahead-of-broadcast". Confirmed mechanism `session-end.md:178`: trailing-K deliberately KEEPS sandwiched `wal:` as "GIỮ NGUYÊN, chấp-nhận noise (hard-safety đổi lấy không-rewrite)".
|
||||
|
||||
- Lead's own `run.md:15` flags it: TRAILING-K "= nguồn của '57 wal: lọt origin/main' S119 ... KHÔNG phải thuần 'ahead-of-broadcast'". The spec discloses the noise-acceptance ("noise-chấp-nhận") but still labels the whole thing positively without the 57-leak provenance.
|
||||
- Primary framing-catch belongs to L2 (run.md explicitly routes it there); noted here as an asymmetry only.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## POSITIVES verified (validate, don't inflate — Smart-Friend guard)
|
||||
|
||||
- **D authority-classification CORRECT** (spec:50): measuring = in-frame; changing budget numbers (`tier1_hotfeed` / `harness_floor` / `crystallized_backfill.target`) = owner-gated; lead does NOT auto-tune. Matches `memory-budget.json token_governor.role_boundary_note`. No over-reach.
|
||||
- **D harness_floor 55K audit is HONEST/self-critical** (spec:49): accurately flags it as mostly-estimate. `memory-budget.json:90 _s112_remeasure_note` = "55000 = honest mid estimate (~19K byte-measured + ~36K harness-injected-est)". ("nửa est" slightly understates the ~65% est-fraction — in SE's own disfavor direction, safe.) NOTE: SE's field already self-labels "ESTIMATE ... not a false-precise number", so it is NOT as bad as the do-token hub-constant ("Grounded in real measurements, NOT a guess") — the spec is being appropriately harsh on itself.
|
||||
- **E-1 model-tier CORRECTLY owner-gated + deferred** (spec:35-36): nấc `agreed, deferred-owner+H23`; lead does NOT touch frontmatter. Verified all-inherit: 14/14 roster `.claude/agents/*.md` = `model: inherit` (README.md has no model line). Tangle with H23-precedence lỗ chưa-test = correctly identified.
|
||||
- **r6 relocate CORRECTLY owner-gated + carries the caveat** (spec:29): "Docs-verified, CHƯA runtime-test" — faithfully mirrors reply:50 honest-note (§A2). Good.
|
||||
- **Push-guard §5.0/§5.2 TRAILING claim FAITHFUL** to code: `session-end.md:159-222` (trailing-K count from HEAD, `(a)` forbid exit-code, `(b)` forbid full-history count = 57 mìn-ngủ, `:178` sandwiched kept). F "executed S122" nấc supported by mark's push-THẬT ×2.
|
||||
- **E bon-vong reflection appropriately humble** (spec:55): acknowledges SE's checker-roles do NOT cross-check each other (harvest-curator KHÔNG soi tooling-auditor) → "kẽ giống hub". nấc `n-a-mostly-aligned` fits a type:new NOT-adopt. (Soft caveat: "có thể AHEAD hub" is generous — SE's lead-auditor roles have run ZERO cycles vs hub loop-3 ran once; the "có thể" hedge saves it.)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What I could NOT verify
|
||||
- The mechanism by which the lead obtained "26075" (stale earlier-session read vs folded-chunk vs mislabel) — I only prove it is NOT the current whole-file N (70892). Any of the three = defect for a "real-N this turn" claim.
|
||||
- Whether the lead's harness build reports the same cap/format as mine (I read cap 25000, char-mode for STATUS, line-mode for HANDOFF). do-token:98 warns cap is tool-specific — but token count of identical content is tokenizer-invariant, so 2.72× cannot be a cap/format artifact.
|
||||
- Ground-truth of `.session-counter.json` counter value (spec:44 says "counter=3"; mark said "counter=0 CHƯA tick" @S122) — not central; not read.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user